NVR vs LEN

For growth investors, NVR, Inc.

(NVR) is the stronger pick with -2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for Lennar Corporation (LEN). Lennar Corporation (LEN) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVR, Inc. (NVR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Lennar Corporation (LEN) is the cheapest at 11.

3x versus NVR, Inc. at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, Lennar Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVR, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Lennar Corporation's 44. 65x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, NVR, Inc.

(NVR) delivered a total return of +18. 6%, compared to -6. 5% for Lennar Corporation (LEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVR returned +272. 4% versus LEN's +129. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVR, Inc.

(NVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Lennar Corporation's 0. 92β — meaning LEN is approximately 36% more volatile than NVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lennar Corporation (LEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 31% for NVR, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVR, Inc.

(NVR) is pulling ahead at -2. 1% versus -3. 6% for Lennar Corporation (LEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVR, Inc. grew EPS -13. 8% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for Lennar Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEN leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NVR, Inc.

(NVR) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 0% net margin versus 6. 0% for Lennar Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVR leads at 16. 2% versus 8. 0% for LEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVR leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NVR, Inc. (NVR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Lennar Corporation's 44. 65x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Lennar Corporation (LEN) trades at 14. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for NVR, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVR: 22. 5% to $7465. 33.

In this comparison, LEN (2.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lennar Corporation (LEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

92), 2. 2% yield, +129. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEN: +129. 2%, NVR: +272. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LEN pays a dividend while NVR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.