NXN vs NXP vs NXC

For growth investors, Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN) is the stronger pick with 555.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN) is the cheapest at 30.

4x versus Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio at 75. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN) delivered a total return of +0.

9%, compared to -3. 4% for Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXP returned +31. 9% versus NXC's +13. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio's 0. 10β — meaning NXP is approximately 152% more volatile than NXC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN) is pulling ahead at 555.

5% versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -70. 8% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the more profitable company, earning 93.

9% net margin versus 60. 7% for Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio — meaning it keeps 93. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXP leads at 93. 9% versus 89. 9% for NXN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXC: +13. 1%, NXP: +31. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NXN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.