REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NXRT vs CBRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
NXRT vs CBRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $748M | $41.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $42.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 91.1% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.56B | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $1.86B |
NXRT vs CBRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 92.2 | -7.8% |
| CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) | 100 | 324.2 | +224.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXRT vs CBRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.48x
- Beta 0.62, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.48x
CBRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 382.3% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 216.0%
- 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.1% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs CBRE's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.2% vs NXRT's -17.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 6.2% vs 1.1% |
NXRT vs CBRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NXRT vs CBRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXRT and CBRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.2B annually — 167.6x NXRT's $252M. CBRE is the more profitable business, keeping 3.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, CBRE holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $42.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $125M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $897M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.1% | +35.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.5% | +18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +98.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NXRT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NXRT's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CBRE's 24.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $748M | $41.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $49.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.40x | 37.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.53x | 24.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.98x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.49x | 4.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.95x | 35.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. CBRE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBRE scores 6/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.1% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.18x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 8.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBRE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBRE five years ago would be worth $16,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,912 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, CBRE leads with a +13.2% total return vs NXRT's -17.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBRE at 24.1% vs NXRT's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | -11.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.3% | +13.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | +91.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.9% | +67.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.0% | +382.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.1% | +24.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NXRT and CBRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRE's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBRE currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs NXRT's 76.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.64 | $174.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.79 | $118.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 222K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NXRT as "Hold" and CBRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for CBRE (target: $180) vs -8.4% for NXRT (target: $27). NXRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $179.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +2.3% |
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CBRE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
NXRT vs CBRE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXRT or CBRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) offers the better valuation at 37. 0x trailing P/E (18. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NXRT or CBRE?
Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) delivered a total return of +67. 8%, compared to -20. 9% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +382. 3% versus NXRT's +216. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NXRT or CBRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CBRE is approximately 80% more volatile than NXRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NXRT or CBRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBRE Group, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBRE leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NXRT or CBRE?
CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXRT leads at 11. 1% versus 3. 2% for CBRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NXRT or CBRE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBRE: 26.
1% to $179. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — NXRT or CBRE?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CBRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NXRT or CBRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 2% yield, +216. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +216. 0%, CBRE: +382. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NXRT and CBRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NXRT pays a dividend while CBRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.