REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
Asset Management
NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $21M | $252M | $102M | $3M | $234M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $60M | $26M | $114M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $31M | $12M | $-68M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 19.7% | 93.9% | 79.9% | -22.4% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -29.8% | 25.3% | 53.4% | 3.1% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x | 6.5x | — | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $350M | $98M | $122M | $510M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $15M | $6M | $15M | $20M |
NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Strategic … (NYC) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| Chicago Atlantic Re… (REFI) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| Creative Media & Co… (CMCT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NYC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
REFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 17.1%
- 26.7% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 91.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.28x
- Beta 0.70, yield 17.1%, current ratio 0.28x
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and dividends.
- 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs NYC's -29.7%
- 15.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CMCT's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 4.6% ROA vs CMCT's -7.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 0.8%
CMCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -6.3%, EPS growth 98.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.6%
TPVG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +7.4% vs CMCT's -99.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs NYC's -29.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.8% margin vs CMCT's -59.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs CMCT's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CMCT's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.4% vs CMCT's -99.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs CMCT's -7.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 0.8% |
NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories
NYC leads 0 • SUNS leads 0 • CMCT leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCT is the larger business by revenue, generating $114M annually — 4.3x SUNS's $26M. REFI is the more profitable business, keeping 51.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCT's -59.4%. On growth, SUNS holds the edge at +108.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $60M | $26M | $114M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$94,000 | $15M | $16M | $23M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $31M | $12M | -$68M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $24M | -$3M | -$40M | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +93.9% | +79.9% | -22.4% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -29.8% | +25.3% | +53.4% | +3.1% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -49.0% | +51.8% | +46.0% | -59.4% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.7% | +40.9% | -13.0% | -35.0% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.5% | +16.3% | +108.1% | -8.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | -51.1% | -55.6% | -2.4% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMCT and TPVG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 41% valuation discount to SUNS's 8.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMCT's 14.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $252M | $102M | $3M | $234M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $336M | $218M | $497M | $683M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 7.12x | 8.03x | -0.09x | 4.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 6.51x | — | 6.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.32x | 12.86x | 14.07x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 4.00x | 3.88x | 0.03x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 0.83x | 0.54x | 0.02x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.76x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REFI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-34 for NYC. REFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NYC's 5.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NYC scores 4/9 vs CMCT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.1% | +0.0% | +6.6% | -24.4% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +0.0% | +4.6% | -7.9% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | +6.9% | +6.0% | +0.8% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | +9.3% | +5.4% | +1.1% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.40x | 0.32x | 0.67x | 1.91x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $349M | $83M | $116M | $494M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $15M | $6M | $15M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $350M | $98M | $122M | $510M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | 4.77x | 3.53x | 0.03x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REFI five years ago would be worth $12,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $410 for CMCT. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +7.4% total return vs CMCT's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REFI at 8.6% vs CMCT's -65.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.0% | +1.4% | -14.3% | -98.3% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.0% | -6.8% | -15.6% | -99.1% | +7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.0% | +28.2% | -11.3% | -95.9% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | +26.7% | -11.3% | -95.9% | -15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | +26.7% | -11.3% | -59.4% | +91.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.7% | +8.6% | -3.9% | -65.5% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NYC and REFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NYC is the less volatile stock with a -0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCT's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REFI currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs CMCT's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.25x | 0.70x | 0.84x | 0.89x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.30 | $15.20 | $11.78 | $1441.00 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.03 | $10.74 | $7.39 | $3.60 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +78.7% | +64.8% | +0.4% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 43.1 | 47.0 | 23.8 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 171K | 105K | 3.9M | 501K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SUNS and CMCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REFI as "Buy", SUNS as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.9% upside for SUNS (target: $15) vs 42.1% for REFI (target: $17). For income investors, CMCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SUNS's 15.41%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $15.25 | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 8 | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | +15.4% | +100.0% | +17.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.05 | $1.18 | $23.89 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.6% | 0.0% |
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
NYC vs REFI vs SUNS vs CMCT vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger pick with 148. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 7% for American Strategic Investment Co. (NYC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. at 8. 0x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) delivered a total return of +26. 7%, compared to -95. 9% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus NYC's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Strategic Investment Co.
(NYC) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 25β versus Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning CMCT is approximately -461% more volatile than NYC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 5% for American Strategic Investment Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is pulling ahead at 148. 1% versus -29. 7% for American Strategic Investment Co. (NYC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -10. 6% for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REFI leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG?
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 1% net margin versus -49. 0% for American Strategic Investment Co. — meaning it keeps 57. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -29. 8% for NYC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 6. 5x for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUNS: 99. 9% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG?
In this comparison, CMCT (100.
0% yield), TPVG (17. 8% yield), REFI (17. 1% yield), SUNS (15. 4% yield) pay a dividend. NYC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NYC or REFI or SUNS or CMCT or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Strategic Investment Co.
(NYC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 25)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NYC: -93. 9%, CMCT: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NYC and REFI and SUNS and CMCT and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (NYC (Real Estate) and REFI (Real Estate) and SUNS (Real Estate) and CMCT (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NYC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REFI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMCT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. REFI, SUNS, CMCT, TPVG pay a dividend while NYC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.