REIT - Retail
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $56.17B | $8.56B | $341.71B | $8.80B | $6.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.92B | $936M | $49.28B | $750M | $593M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.12B | $387M | $13.70B | $220M | $257M |
| Gross Margin | 68.6% | 81.4% | 61.7% | 87.6% | 84.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 63.3% | 29.3% | 48.0% | 65.0% |
| Forward P/E | 37.7x | 22.3x | 24.3x | 37.8x | 22.6x |
| Total Debt | $32.85B | $4.82B | $45.49B | $3.35B | $2.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $435M | $5M | $10.27B | $16M | $60M |
O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 104.5 | +4.5% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 111.5 | +11.5% |
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 197.8 | +97.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
O is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.4% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
NNN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 0.19x
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.19x
- Lower P/E (22.3x vs 37.8x), PEG 2.00 vs 110.42
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +17.7% vs EPRT's -6.3%
- 13.1% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%
Among these 5 stocks, ADC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EPRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 11.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 174.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
- PEG 0.95 vs KO's 2.17
- 25.0% FFO/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% FFO/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.3x vs 37.8x), PEG 2.00 vs 110.42 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.3% margin vs O's 18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs O's 0.07 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs EPRT's -6.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8% |
O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
EPRT leads 1 • NNN leads 1 • O leads 0 • ADC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 83.1x EPRT's $593M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 18.9%. On growth, EPRT holds the edge at +24.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $936M | $49.3B | $750M | $593M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.2B | $867M | $15.5B | $638M | $548M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $387M | $13.7B | $220M | $257M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.1B | $464M | $12.6B | $110M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.6% | +81.4% | +61.7% | +87.6% | +84.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +63.3% | +29.3% | +48.0% | +65.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +41.4% | +27.8% | +29.3% | +43.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +49.6% | +25.5% | +14.7% | -25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +4.1% | +12.1% | +18.7% | +24.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | -2.0% | +18.2% | +19.0% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NNN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 58% valuation discount to O's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EPRT offers better value at 0.96x vs ADC's 110.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56.2B | $8.6B | $341.7B | $8.8B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $88.6B | $13.4B | $376.9B | $12.1B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.49x | 21.74x | 26.12x | 41.38x | 22.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.67x | 22.25x | 24.27x | 37.82x | 22.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 72.32x | 1.95x | 2.34x | 110.42x | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.61x | 15.96x | 25.45x | 19.70x | 17.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.77x | 9.24x | 7.13x | 12.25x | 11.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.92x | 9.99x | 1.30x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.06x | 12.83x | 64.52x | 17.45x | 16.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for O. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +8.8% | +41.1% | +3.7% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +4.1% | +13.1% | +2.3% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +4.8% | +15.8% | +2.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +6.4% | +17.3% | +3.8% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 1.09x | 1.33x | 0.53x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.4B | $4.8B | $35.2B | $3.3B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $435M | $5M | $10.3B | $16M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32.9B | $4.8B | $45.5B | $3.4B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.93x | 10.70x | 2.54x | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,681 for O. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.7% total return vs EPRT's -6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 11.7% vs O's 4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +16.9% | +16.4% | +3.4% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +11.0% | +17.7% | +1.4% | -6.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | +22.2% | +39.3% | +25.8% | +35.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | +19.6% | +65.3% | +26.4% | +28.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.4% | +40.8% | +115.0% | +122.1% | +174.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.9% | +6.9% | +11.7% | +8.0% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than O's 0.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs EPRT's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.05x | -0.23x | -0.16x | -0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.94 | $46.90 | $84.04 | $82.08 | $34.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.86 | $38.90 | $65.35 | $69.56 | $28.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +95.9% | +94.5% | +89.2% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 50.9 | 49.2 | 44.8 | 38.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 1.6M | 13.6M | 990K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — O and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: O as "Hold", NNN as "Hold", KO as "Buy", ADC as "Buy", EPRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.2% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs 4.3% for NNN (target: $47). For income investors, O offers the higher dividend yield at 5.36% vs KO's 2.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $46.93 | $86.13 | $84.06 | $36.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 29 | 48 | 32 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +5.2% | +2.6% | +4.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 32 | 36 | 56 | 13 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.23 | $2.36 | $2.04 | $3.06 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EPRT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
O vs NNN vs KO vs ADC vs EPRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Realty Income Corporation at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 0. 95x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 110. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to +16. 8% for Realty Income Corporation (O). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +174. 7% versus NNN's +40. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Realty Income Corporation's 0. 07β — meaning O is approximately -129% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPRT leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus 18. 4% for Realty Income Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 95x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 110. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 22. 3x forward P/E versus 37. 8x for Agree Realty Corporation — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 25. 2% to $36. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Realty Income Corporation (O) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO).
09Is O or NNN or KO or ADC or EPRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, O: +43. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between O and NNN and KO and ADC and EPRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (O (Real Estate) and NNN (Real Estate) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ADC (Real Estate) and EPRT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.