OBE
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$856M
5Y Perf.+3657.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OBE vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+222.2%
OBE vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OBE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $856M | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $602M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 52.0% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $216M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $10.68B |
OBE vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OBE
XOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE) | 100 | 3757.8 | +3657.8% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OBE vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Obsidian Energy Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OBE
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder
OBE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 112.7% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 0.54x
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 14.8x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Pick
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- Beta -0.15, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.15x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XOM | -4.5% revenue growth vs OBE's -35.5% |
| Value | OBE | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 14.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | XOM | 8.9% margin vs OBE's 5.9% |
| Stability / Safety | OBE | Lower D/E ratio (15.5% vs 16.3%) |
| Dividends | XOM | 2.7% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OBE | +211.0% vs XOM's +43.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs OBE's 1.8%, ROIC 8.6% vs 3.4% |
OBE vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
OBE vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOBELAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
2leads
OBEObsidian Energy Ltd.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OBE3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XOM5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OBE6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
XOM1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OBE and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 538.5x OBE's $602M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.9% (XOM) to 5.9% (OBE). On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OBEObsidian Energy L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $602M | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$63M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.0% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.3% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.0% | -11.0% |
Evenly matched — OBE and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OBE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 38% valuation discount to OBE's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OBE's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | OBEObsidian Energy L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $856M | $620.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $653.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.42x | 21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.56x | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.16x | 10.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.16x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x |
OBE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for OBE. OBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOM's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OBE scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | OBEObsidian Energy L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $216M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | 69.44x |
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OBE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OBE five years ago would be worth $76,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,464 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, OBE leads with a +211.0% total return vs XOM's +43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OBE at 26.3% vs XOM's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OBEObsidian Energy L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +102.2% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +211.0% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.3% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +661.7% | +164.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.7% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | +13.2% |
OBE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OBE and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OBE's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OBE currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OBEObsidian Energy L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.59 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.88 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 18.9M |
Evenly matched — OBE and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OBE as "Hold" and XOM as "Hold". XOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | OBEObsidian Energy L… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +3.3% |
XOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
OBE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). XOM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallObsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OBE vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBE or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OBE or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus Obsidian Energy Ltd. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Obsidian Energy Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OBE or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Obsidian Energy Ltd.
(OBE) delivered a total return of +661. 7%, compared to +164. 6% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OBE returned +112. 7% versus XOM's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OBE or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Obsidian Energy Ltd. 's 0. 45β — meaning OBE is approximately -409% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 16% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OBE or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -35. 5% for Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Obsidian Energy Ltd. grew EPS 118. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OBE or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus 6. 5% for Obsidian Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OBE leads at 14. 1% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OBE or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Obsidian Energy Ltd.
(OBE) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — OBE or XOM?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. OBE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OBE or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, OBE: +112. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OBE and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
XOM pays a dividend while OBE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OBE: -47.3% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(OBE: 5.9% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(OBE: 35.4x · XOM: 21.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.