Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OBIO vs MDT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OBIO
Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$222M
5Y Perf.-64.9%
MDT
Medtronic plc

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • IE
Market Cap$99.94B
5Y Perf.-27.5%

OBIO vs MDT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OBIO logoOBIO
MDT logoMDT
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Devices
Market Cap$222M$99.94B
Revenue (TTM)$33M$35.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$4.61B
Gross Margin99.4%61.9%
Operating Margin-154.7%17.9%
Forward P/E14.1x
Total Debt$2M$28.52B
Cash & Equiv.$35M$2.22B

OBIO vs MDTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OBIO
MDT
StockAug 20May 26Return
Orchestra BioMed Ho… (OBIO)10035.1-64.9%
Medtronic plc (MDT)10072.5-27.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OBIO vs MDT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MDT leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OBIO
Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

OBIO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 33.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 111.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.21, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 6.45x
  • 11.7% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MDT
Medtronic plc
The Income Pick

MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
  • 26.5% 10Y total return vs OBIO's -65.5%
  • Beta 0.47, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.85x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOBIO logoOBIO11.7% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
Quality / MarginsMDT logoMDT13.0% margin vs OBIO's -158.2%
Stability / SafetyMDT logoMDTBeta 0.47 vs OBIO's 2.21
DividendsMDT logoMDT3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OBIO logoOBIO+59.8% vs MDT's -2.8%
Efficiency (ROA)MDT logoMDT175.8% ROA vs OBIO's -65.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -162.6%

OBIO vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OBIOOrchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$611,000
MDTMedtronic plc
FY 2025
Cardiac and Vascular Group
37.3%$12.5B
Neuroscience Group
29.4%$9.8B
Medical Surgical
25.1%$8.4B
Diabetes Group
8.2%$2.8B

OBIO vs MDT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMDTLAGGINGOBIO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — OBIO and MDT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 1059.8x OBIO's $33M. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OBIO's -158.2%. On growth, OBIO holds the edge at +121.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$33M$35.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$52M$9.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M$4.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M$5.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.4%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-154.7%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-158.2%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-147.7%+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+121.2%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+166.7%-11.9%
Evenly matched — OBIO and MDT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Market CapShares × price$222M$99.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$189M$126.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.54x21.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate36.00x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.63x2.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2817.20x2.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.28x
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-185 for OBIO. OBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDT's 0.59x.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-185.1%+9.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-65.9%+175.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-162.6%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-65.5%+7.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M$26.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$35M$2.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$28.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.08x
MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MDT five years ago would be worth $7,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,772 for OBIO. Over the past 12 months, OBIO leads with a +59.8% total return vs MDT's -2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDT at -1.4% vs OBIO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.8%-18.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+59.8%-2.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.3%-4.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.3%-27.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-65.5%+26.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-40.0%-1.4%
MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OBIO's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.21x0.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.42$106.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.20$77.16
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.5%+73.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.227.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded192K7.8M
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates OBIO as "Buy" and MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 205.3% upside for OBIO (target: $12) vs 40.5% for MDT (target: $110). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOBIO logoOBIOOrchestra BioMed …MDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.00$109.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts449
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises36
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.78
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MDT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallMedtronic plc (MDT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OBIO vs MDT: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OBIO or MDT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.

(OBIO) is the stronger pick with 1169% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — OBIO or MDT?

Over the past 5 years, Medtronic plc (MDT) delivered a total return of -27.

7%, compared to -62. 3% for Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDT returned +26. 5% versus OBIO's -65. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — OBIO or MDT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

47β versus Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning OBIO is approximately 374% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for Medtronic plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — OBIO or MDT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.

(OBIO) is pulling ahead at 1169% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 33. 1% year-over-year, compared to 30. 8% for Medtronic plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, OBIO leads at 111. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — OBIO or MDT?

Medtronic plc (MDT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus -158. 2% for Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -154. 7% for OBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OBIO leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is OBIO or MDT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OBIO: 205.

3% to $12. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — OBIO or MDT?

In this comparison, MDT (3.

6% yield) pays a dividend. OBIO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is OBIO or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

47), 3. 6% yield). Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +26. 5%, OBIO: -65. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between OBIO and MDT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while OBIO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

OBIO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6060%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OBIO and MDT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OBIO: 12120.2% · MDT: 8.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.