Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
Oil & Gas Midstream
Banks - Regional
OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Insurance - Specialty | Oil & Gas Midstream | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.08B | $569M | $3.33B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $656M | $325M | $1.73B | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $46M | $228M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 54.5% | 47.6% | 24.8% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 17.8% | 8.2% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 14.4x | 42.4x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.63B | $491K | $3.87B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $135M | $62M | $4M | $185M |
OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 702.3 | +602.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCFC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 42.4x)
AMSF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
- Beta 0.23 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage
- 5.6% ROA vs OCFC's 0.5%, ROIC 21.9% vs 2.2%
KNTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 16.5%
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- Beta 0.60, yield 16.5%, current ratio 0.69x
- 19.0% revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs OCFC's 45.4%
- PEG 1.53 vs OCFC's 3.57
- NIM 3.1% vs OCFC's 2.5%
- 19.5% margin vs OCFC's 10.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 42.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.5% margin vs OCFC's 10.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs AMSF's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs OCFC's 0.5%, ROIC 21.9% vs 2.2% |
OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories
OCFC leads 1 • AMSF leads 1 • KNTK leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 5.3x AMSF's $325M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCFC's 10.8%. On growth, AMSF holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $656M | $325M | $1.7B | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $58M | $534M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $46M | $228M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $80M | $8M | $441M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.5% | +47.6% | +24.8% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +17.8% | +8.2% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +14.3% | +13.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +2.5% | +25.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.3% | -7.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | -8.5% | -2.4% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OCFC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 33% valuation discount to KNTK's 18.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $569M | $3.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $508M | $7.2B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.14x | 12.27x | 18.43x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.93x | 14.42x | 42.44x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.80x | — | — | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.70x | 8.53x | 13.14x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 1.80x | 1.89x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 2.30x | 1.04x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.63x | 63.83x | 44.78x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNTK delivers a 21.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNTK's 1.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs KNTK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +9.7% | +21.1% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +5.6% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +21.9% | +1.9% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +16.8% | +2.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 0.00x | 1.32x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$61M | $3.9B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $135M | $62M | $4M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $491,000 | $3.9B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.33x | — | 5.98x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNTK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KNTK five years ago would be worth $19,312 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,110 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, KNTK leads with a +28.0% total return vs AMSF's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNTK at 24.7% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -18.3% | +37.4% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.5% | -29.2% | +28.0% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | -24.8% | +93.9% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | -18.9% | +93.1% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +31.8% | -33.5% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | -9.1% | +24.7% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMSF and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.23x | 0.60x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.61 | $48.54 | $51.11 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.09 | $29.42 | $31.33 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +62.4% | +94.8% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 34.2 | 51.3 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 662K | 212K | 1.2M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OCFC as "Hold", AMSF as "Buy", KNTK as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.9% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs -1.8% for KNTK (target: $48). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.67 | $44.50 | $47.57 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 6 | 15 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +8.4% | +16.5% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $2.55 | $7.98 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.6% | +2.1% | +5.3% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OCFC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OCFC vs AMSF vs KNTK vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) delivered a total return of +93. 1%, compared to -18. 9% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus KNTK's -33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 356% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 132% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 10. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 9. 3% for KNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 32. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 46. 9% to $44. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 3. 2% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB).
09Is OCFC or AMSF or KNTK or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +31. 8%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OCFC and AMSF and KNTK and NBTB?
These companies operate in different sectors (OCFC (Financial Services) and AMSF (Financial Services) and KNTK (Energy) and NBTB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.