Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OCSL vs GBDC vs ARCC vs FSCO vs PFLT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.07B
5Y Perf.-43.6%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.43B
5Y Perf.-6.0%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.65B
5Y Perf.-3.3%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+0.6%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$885M
5Y Perf.-22.8%

OCSL vs GBDC vs ARCC vs FSCO vs PFLT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OCSL logoOCSL
GBDC logoGBDC
ARCC logoARCC
FSCO logoFSCO
PFLT logoPFLT
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$1.07B$3.43B$13.65B$1.02B$885M
Revenue (TTM)$300M$871M$3.15B$254M$172M
Net Income (TTM)$50M$205M$1.15B$188M$118M
Gross Margin87.2%81.5%75.7%81.3%45.6%
Operating Margin50.4%78.9%69.7%77.5%39.4%
Forward P/E8.0x9.5x9.9x5.4x7.9x
Total Debt$1.49B$4.90B$15.99B$453M$1.78B
Cash & Equiv.$80M$24M$924M$189M$123M

OCSL vs GBDC vs ARCC vs FSCO vs PFLTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OCSL
GBDC
ARCC
FSCO
PFLT
StockNov 22May 26Return
Oaktree Specialty L… (OCSL)10056.4-43.6%
Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC)10094.0-6.0%
Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC)10096.7-3.3%
FS Credit Opportuni… (FSCO)100100.6+0.6%
PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT)10077.2-22.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OCSL vs GBDC vs ARCC vs FSCO vs PFLT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GBDC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
The Banking Pick

OCSL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 14.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 11.20x
  • Beta 0.61, yield 14.2%, current ratio 11.20x
  • 60.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 4.4%
  • PEG 0.31 vs ARCC's 0.97
  • Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.61 vs PFLT's 0.78, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
The Banking Pick

ARCC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 139.6% 10Y total return vs FSCO's 70.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
The Banking Pick

FSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 8.9% vs ARCC's 3.6%
Best for: bank quality
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, PFLT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOCSL logoOCSL60.9% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
ValueOCSL logoOCSLBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGBDC logoGBDCEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyGBDC logoGBDCBeta 0.61 vs PFLT's 0.78, lower leverage
DividendsOCSL logoOCSL14.2% yield, vs FSCO's 13.9%
Momentum (1Y)GBDC logoGBDC+2.0% vs FSCO's -16.1%
Efficiency (ROA)GBDC logoGBDCEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCSL's 0.4%

OCSL vs GBDC vs ARCC vs FSCO vs PFLT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSCOLAGGINGARCC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 18.3x PFLT's $172M. FSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 74.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCSL's 11.3%.

MetricOCSL logoOCSLOaktree Specialty…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$300M$871M$3.1B$254M$172M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$129M$431M$2.0B$39M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$205M$1.1B$118M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$13M$313M$1.1B$242M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+81.5%+75.7%+81.3%+45.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+50.4%+78.9%+69.7%+77.5%+39.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.3%+43.2%+41.3%+74.2%+38.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+47.5%-13.0%+36.3%+26.5%+55.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+50.0%-160.0%-63.9%+165.4%
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OCSL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.4x trailing earnings, FSCO trades at a 83% valuation discount to OCSL's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs PFLT's 1.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOCSL logoOCSLOaktree Specialty…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$3.4B$13.6B$1.0B$885M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.5B$8.3B$28.7B$1.3B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS31.15x9.27x10.22x5.42x12.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.04x9.53x9.94x7.90x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.30x0.99x1.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.41x12.08x13.11x6.54x37.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.57x3.94x4.34x4.03x5.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.71x0.88x0.93x0.72x0.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.52x11.95x15.23x9.31x
OCSL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSCO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSCO delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for OCSL. FSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFLT's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCSL scores 7/9 vs FSCO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOCSL logoOCSLOaktree Specialty…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.4%+5.2%+8.1%+13.5%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+2.3%+3.8%+8.5%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.7%+5.9%+5.7%+8.1%+2.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.9%+7.8%+7.5%+9.0%+2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974434
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.01x1.23x1.12x0.32x1.65x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.4B$4.9B$15.1B$264M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$80M$24M$924M$189M$123M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$4.9B$16.0B$453M$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.18x1.62x2.98x4.14x0.35x
FSCO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSCO five years ago would be worth $17,062 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,200 for OCSL. Over the past 12 months, GBDC leads with a +2.0% total return vs FSCO's -16.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSCO at 19.7% vs OCSL's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOCSL logoOCSLOaktree Specialty…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.3%-0.6%-4.6%-14.9%-0.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.8%+2.0%-0.3%-16.1%+0.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.5%+35.4%+34.5%+71.4%+17.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.0%+33.9%+48.0%+70.6%+19.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+89.2%+61.1%+139.6%+70.6%+72.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.5%+10.6%+10.4%+19.7%+5.7%
FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GBDC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GBDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFLT's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GBDC currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs FSCO's 67.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOCSL logoOCSLOaktree Specialty…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.61x0.61x0.75x0.64x0.78x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.77$15.63$23.42$7.65$10.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.63$11.77$17.40$4.13$7.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.3%+84.2%+81.2%+67.3%+82.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.349.152.949.457.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded988K2.3M7.4M1.9M1.0M
GBDC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — OCSL and FSCO and PFLT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: OCSL as "Hold", GBDC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", PFLT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.7% upside for PFLT (target: $11) vs 2.9% for OCSL (target: $13). For income investors, OCSL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.17% vs ARCC's 2.02%.

MetricOCSL logoOCSLOaktree Specialty…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…FSCO logoFSCOFS Credit Opportu…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.50$14.25$21.88$10.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts12113211
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.2%+10.5%+2.0%+13.9%+13.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00033
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.72$1.38$0.38$0.72$1.21
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%+2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — OCSL and FSCO and PFLT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PFLT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallFS Credit Opportunities Cor… (FSCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OCSL vs GBDC vs ARCC vs FSCO vs PFLT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is the stronger pick with 60.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT?

On trailing P/E, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

(FSCO) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT?

Over the past 5 years, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

(FSCO) delivered a total return of +70. 6%, compared to +12. 0% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 6% versus GBDC's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. 's 0. 78β — meaning PFLT is approximately 27% more volatile than GBDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 165% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is pulling ahead at 60.

9% versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. grew EPS 4. 4% year-over-year, compared to -48. 6% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT?

FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

(FSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 2% net margin versus 11. 3% for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 74. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GBDC leads at 78. 9% versus 39. 4% for PFLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCSL leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFLT: 17. 7% to $10. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) offers the highest yield at 14. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

09

Is OCSL or GBDC or ARCC or FSCO or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

61), 14. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCSL: +89. 2%, PFLT: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OCSL and GBDC and ARCC and FSCO and PFLT?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OCSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FSCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OCSL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GBDC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARCC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSCO

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 44%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFLT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.4%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OCSL and GBDC and ARCC and FSCO and PFLT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OCSL: 60.9% · GBDC: 42.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(OCSL: 11.3% · GBDC: 43.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(OCSL: 31.2x · GBDC: 9.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.