Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ODFL vs WERN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
ODFL vs WERN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $41.81B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.50B | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 38.2x | 39.8x |
| Total Debt | $141M | $752M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $120M | $60M |
ODFL vs WERN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 234.5 | +134.5% |
| Werner Enterprises,… (WERN) | 100 | 78.8 | -21.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ODFL vs WERN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ODFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs WERN's 76.0%
- Lower P/E (38.2x vs 39.8x)
- 18.6% margin vs WERN's -0.5%
WERN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth -1.8%, EPS growth -143.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 54.1%, current ratio 1.94x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.8% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.2x vs 39.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs WERN's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs ODFL's 1.38 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WERN's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.8% vs ODFL's +31.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs WERN's -0.5%, ROIC 23.6% vs 2.5% |
ODFL vs WERN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ODFL vs WERN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 1.8x WERN's $3.0B. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WERN's -0.5%. On growth, WERN holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $343M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $955M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.2% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.4% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WERN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WERN's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ODFL's 24.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.8B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41.8B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.54x | -151.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.18x | 39.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.71x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.24x | 8.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.61x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.77x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.78x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-1 for WERN. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WERN's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ODFL scores 6/9 vs WERN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.0% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.6% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.1% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $120M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $141M | $752M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4601.85x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ODFL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ODFL five years ago would be worth $15,457 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,167 for WERN. Over the past 12 months, WERN leads with a +46.8% total return vs ODFL's +31.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ODFL at 9.3% vs WERN's -5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.2% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.6% | +46.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.7% | -16.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.6% | -18.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +866.7% | +76.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | -5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WERN is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ODFL's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WERN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs ODFL's 85.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $233.79 | $38.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $126.01 | $23.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.8% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ODFL and WERN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ODFL as "Hold" and WERN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.8% upside for ODFL (target: $208) vs -0.8% for WERN (target: $36). For income investors, WERN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.54% vs ODFL's 0.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $208.19 | $36.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.12 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +2.5% |
ODFL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WERN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ODFL vs WERN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ODFL or WERN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the stronger pick with -1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) offers the better valuation at 41. 5x trailing P/E (38. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ODFL or WERN?
On forward P/E, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 38. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ODFL or WERN?
Over the past 5 years, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) delivered a total return of +54. 6%, compared to -18. 3% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. (WERN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ODFL returned +866. 7% versus WERN's +76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ODFL or WERN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning ODFL is approximately 11% more volatile than WERN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 54% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ODFL or WERN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is pulling ahead at -1. 8% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. grew EPS -11. 9% year-over-year, compared to -143. 6% for Werner Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WERN leads at -3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ODFL or WERN?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus 2. 3% for WERN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ODFL or WERN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) trades at 38. 2x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ODFL: 3. 8% to $208. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — ODFL or WERN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Werner Enterprises, Inc. (WERN) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 6% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL).
09Is ODFL or WERN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +866. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +866. 7%, WERN: +76. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ODFL and WERN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.