Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Business Equipment & Supplies
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Business Equipment & Supplies
ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Business Equipment & Supplies | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $843M | $1.70B | $1.11B | $1.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.53B | $3.59B | $3.75B | $3.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-15M | $-25M | $95M |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 39.9% | 38.7% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 4.6% | 2.0% | 4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 8.6x | 9.0x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.06B | $1.63B | $1.81B | $601M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $209M | $194M | $346M |
ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The ODP Corporation (ODP) | 100 | 113.4 | +13.4% |
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 163.0 | +63.0% |
| MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
| Steelcase Inc. (SCS) | 100 | 140.7 | +40.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ODP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +103.0% vs HNI's -17.7%
HNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -61.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 88.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- 12.4% revenue growth vs ODP's -10.6%
MLKN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.69, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 4.6% yield, vs HNI's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 38.1% 10Y total return vs HNI's 9.3%
- 2.9% margin vs MLKN's -0.7%
- 4.1% ROA vs MLKN's -0.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs ODP's -10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs MLKN's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs SCS's 2.04 | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs HNI's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.0% vs HNI's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs MLKN's -0.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.3% |
ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
HNI leads 1 • ODP leads 1 • MLKN leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODP is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 2.0x SCS's $3.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (SCS) to -0.7% (MLKN). On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.5B | $3.6B | $3.7B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $134M | $323M | $145M | $207M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$15M | -$25M | $95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $120M | $8M | $70M | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +39.9% | +38.7% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +4.6% | +2.0% | +4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | -0.4% | -0.7% | +2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +0.2% | +1.9% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.7% | +124.7% | -1.6% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.3% | -100.0% | -75.5% | -43.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ODP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, SCS trades at a 49% valuation discount to HNI's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ODP's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLKN's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $843M | $1.7B | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $3.1B | $2.7B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -326.72x | 31.26x | -30.91x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.89x | 8.57x | 9.00x | 14.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 12.39x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.67x | 9.01x | 14.29x | 8.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.92x | 0.85x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.35x | 8.06x | 10.92x | 18.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCS delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MLKN. SCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLKN's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCS scores 6/9 vs ODP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.1% | -1.2% | -1.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.6% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +7.8% | +1.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +9.3% | +1.5% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.89x | 1.36x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $892M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $254M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $209M | $194M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $601M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | 2.01x | 0.66x | 5.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCS five years ago would be worth $12,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,609 for MLKN. Over the past 12 months, ODP leads with a +103.0% total return vs HNI's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCS at 30.0% vs ODP's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -17.7% | -9.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.0% | -17.7% | +6.9% | +64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +42.6% | +11.1% | +119.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.9% | -7.3% | -53.9% | +26.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +9.3% | -23.2% | +38.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +12.5% | +3.6% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ODP and HNI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCS's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ODP currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs HNI's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 1.07x | 1.69x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.04 | $53.29 | $23.18 | $17.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.64 | $31.41 | $13.77 | $9.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +65.1% | +70.7% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.4 | 34.4 | 44.2 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 743K | 845K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MLKN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ODP as "Buy", HNI as "Buy", MLKN as "Hold", SCS as "Hold". For income investors, MLKN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.58% vs SCS's 2.56%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% | +4.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.29 | $0.75 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +37.4% | +4.9% | +7.6% | +2.0% |
SCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HNI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ODP vs HNI vs MLKN vs SCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for The ODP Corporation (ODP). Steelcase Inc. (SCS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The ODP Corporation (ODP) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS?
On trailing P/E, Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus HNI Corporation at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, HNI Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS?
Over the past 5 years, Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) delivered a total return of +26. 4%, compared to -53. 9% for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCS returned +38. 1% versus ODP's -49. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HNI Corporation (HNI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Steelcase Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning SCS is approximately 90% more volatile than HNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Steelcase Inc. (SCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 136% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HNI Corporation (HNI) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -10. 6% for The ODP Corporation (ODP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Steelcase Inc. grew EPS 50. 0% year-over-year, compared to -147. 7% for MillerKnoll, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HNI leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS?
Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus -1. 0% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNI leads at 8. 4% versus 1. 4% for MLKN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HNI leads at 41. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HNI Corporation (HNI) trades at 8.
6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Steelcase Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS?
In this comparison, MLKN (4.
6% yield), HNI (3. 7% yield), SCS (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ODP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ODP or HNI or MLKN or SCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 3. 7% yield). The ODP Corporation (ODP) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNI: +9. 3%, ODP: -49. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ODP and HNI and MLKN and SCS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ODP (Consumer Cyclical) and HNI (Industrials) and MLKN (Consumer Cyclical) and SCS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ODP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MLKN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SCS is a small-cap deep-value stock. HNI, MLKN, SCS pay a dividend while ODP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.