Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $535M | $6.96B | $5.13B | $1.54B | $28.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $509M | $8.69B | $4.05B | $3.40B | $10.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $91M | $150M | $-141M | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | -9.3% | 19.5% | 10.7% | 15.6% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 5.3% | 1.5% | -2.5% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 21.7x | 3480.2x | 20.7x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $88M | $2.34B | $873M | $669M | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $1.55B | $28M | $164M | $1.03B |
OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oil States Internat… (OIS) | 100 | 209.7 | +109.7% |
| NOV Inc. (NOV) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 615.0 | +515.0% |
| Dnow Inc. (DNOW) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| TechnipFMC plc (FTI) | 100 | 1172.3 | +1072.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 24.3x)
NOV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.01, yield 2.6%, current ratio 2.42x
- 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +186.8% vs DNOW's -10.8%
DNOW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 29.9%, current ratio 2.34x
- 18.8% revenue growth vs LBRT's -7.2%
FTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 221.3% 10Y total return vs LBRT's 94.1%
- 10.6% margin vs OIS's -20.9%
- Beta 0.59 vs OIS's 1.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs LBRT's -7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.6% margin vs OIS's -20.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs OIS's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +186.8% vs DNOW's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs OIS's -11.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs -0.5% |
OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTI leads in 3 of 6 categories
DNOW leads 1 • NOV leads 1 • OIS leads 0 • LBRT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 20.0x OIS's $509M. FTI is the more profitable business, keeping 10.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OIS's -20.9%. On growth, DNOW holds the edge at +97.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $509M | $8.7B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $725M | $549M | -$44M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | $91M | $150M | -$141M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $734M | -$193M | $53M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +19.5% | +10.7% | +15.6% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +5.3% | +1.5% | -2.5% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.9% | +1.0% | +3.7% | -4.1% | +10.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +8.4% | -4.8% | +1.6% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -2.4% | +4.5% | +97.5% | +11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.5% | -73.7% | +16.7% | -2.2% | +93.9% |
Valuation Metrics
DNOW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, FTI trades at a 38% valuation discount to NOV's 49.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NOV's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTI's 21.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $535M | $7.0B | $5.1B | $1.5B | $28.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $553M | $7.7B | $6.0B | $2.0B | $29.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.78x | 49.49x | 35.58x | -17.43x | 30.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.20x | 21.73x | 3480.22x | 20.66x | 24.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.91x | 8.43x | 10.28x | — | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 0.80x | 1.28x | 0.55x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 1.14x | 2.53x | 0.69x | 8.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.24x | 8.06x | 363.85x | 11.50x | 19.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-17 for OIS. OIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTI's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTI scores 7/9 vs DNOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.8% | +1.4% | +7.4% | -8.4% | +32.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.3% | +0.8% | +4.0% | -5.0% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +5.8% | +2.3% | -3.3% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +6.3% | +3.0% | -3.9% | +18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.37x | 0.42x | 0.30x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $788M | $846M | $505M | $984M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $1.6B | $28M | $164M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $88M | $2.3B | $873M | $669M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.40x | 5.82x | 5.24x | — | 22.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTI five years ago would be worth $83,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,336 for DNOW. Over the past 12 months, LBRT leads with a +186.8% total return vs DNOW's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTI at 72.4% vs OIS's 8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.7% | +18.2% | +68.2% | -2.2% | +50.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.2% | +67.6% | +186.8% | -10.8% | +144.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | +29.3% | +166.1% | +38.3% | +412.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | +19.6% | +132.4% | +13.4% | +734.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | -31.8% | +94.1% | -22.8% | +221.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +8.9% | +38.6% | +11.4% | +72.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NOV and FTI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTI is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OIS's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NOV currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs OIS's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.01x | 1.31x | 0.83x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.50 | $20.93 | $34.41 | $17.26 | $77.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.17 | $11.65 | $9.90 | $10.94 | $28.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +92.2% | +92.0% | +75.7% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.3 | 55.4 | 58.7 | 68.2 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 931K | 4.8M | 4.2M | 3.2M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
NOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OIS as "Hold", NOV as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy", DNOW as "Buy", FTI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.5% upside for OIS (target: $14) vs -5.2% for FTI (target: $67). For income investors, NOV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs FTI's 0.28%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $19.38 | $34.00 | $17.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 58 | 19 | 16 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +1.0% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.51 | $0.33 | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +4.5% | +0.5% | +2.4% | +3.2% |
FTI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DNOW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OIS vs NOV vs LBRT vs DNOW vs FTI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dnow Inc.
(DNOW) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). TechnipFMC plc (FTI) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI?
On trailing P/E, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus NOV Inc. at 49. 5x. On forward P/E, Oil States International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI?
Over the past 5 years, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) delivered a total return of +734.
4%, compared to +13. 4% for Dnow Inc. (DNOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTI returned +221. 3% versus OIS's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
59β versus Oil States International, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning OIS is approximately 127% more volatile than FTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oil States International, Inc. (OIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 59% for TechnipFMC plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dnow Inc.
(DNOW) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -7. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechnipFMC plc grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -933. 3% for Oil States International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTI leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI?
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus -16. 3% for Oil States International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTI leads at 9. 6% versus -2. 9% for DNOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOV leads at 20. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oil States International, Inc.
(OIS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3465. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OIS: 57. 5% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI?
In this comparison, NOV (2.
6% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield), FTI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. OIS, DNOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OIS or NOV or LBRT or DNOW or FTI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
59), +221. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTI: +221. 3%, OIS: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OIS and NOV and LBRT and DNOW and FTI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DNOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NOV, LBRT pay a dividend while OIS, DNOW, FTI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.