Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OLB
The OLB Group, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$919K
5Y Perf.-99.1%
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.81B
5Y Perf.-49.8%
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$451M
5Y Perf.-28.9%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.12B
5Y Perf.-48.4%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-68.3%

OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OLB logoOLB
FOUR logoFOUR
PRTH logoPRTH
FLYW logoFLYW
FIS logoFIS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$919K$3.81B$451M$2.12B$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$10M$3.33B$953M$188.60B$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$86M$56M$12.54B$382M
Gross Margin-15.7%35.2%21.4%0.2%38.1%
Operating Margin-85.3%11.3%14.8%5.7%17.5%
Forward P/E8.4x5.8x49.5x7.5x
Total Debt$375K$4.62B$1.05B$0.00$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$27K$964M$77M$330M$599M

OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OLB
FOUR
PRTH
FLYW
FIS
StockMay 21May 26Return
The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB)1000.9-99.1%
Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR)10050.2-49.8%
Priority Technology… (PRTH)10071.1-28.9%
Flywire Corporation (FLYW)10051.6-48.4%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10031.7-68.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLYW leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. PRTH also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OLB
The OLB Group, Inc.
The Technology Pick

OLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 39.7% 10Y total return vs PRTH's -43.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

PRTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.5x)
Best for: value
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
The Growth Play

FLYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
  • 26.6% revenue growth vs OLB's -58.0%
  • 6.6% margin vs OLB's -92.7%
  • +62.7% vs OLB's -63.9%
Best for: growth exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Beta 0.76 vs PRTH's 2.12
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLYW logoFLYW26.6% revenue growth vs OLB's -58.0%
ValuePRTH logoPRTHLower P/E (5.8x vs 7.5x)
Quality / MarginsFLYW logoFLYW6.6% margin vs OLB's -92.7%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.76 vs PRTH's 2.12
DividendsFIS logoFIS3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLYW logoFLYW+62.7% vs OLB's -63.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FLYW logoFLYW4.3% ROA vs OLB's -72.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -108.7%

OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OLBThe OLB Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments Based Revenue
88.4%$3.5B
Subscription And Other Revenues
11.6%$454M
PRTHPriority Technology Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
74.6%$711M
Money Transmissions Services
16.7%$159M
Outsourced Services And Other Services
7.4%$71M
Product
1.3%$12M
FLYWFlywire Corporation
FY 2025
Transactions
100.0%$503M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRTHLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 19565.2x OLB's $10M. FLYW is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OLB's -92.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOLB logoOLBThe OLB Group, In…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$3.3B$953M$188.6B$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$629M$204M$10.8B$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$86M$56M$12.5B$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$687M$75M-$15.8B$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-15.7%+35.2%+21.4%+0.2%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-85.3%+11.3%+14.8%+5.7%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-92.7%+2.6%+5.8%+6.6%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-23.9%+20.6%+7.9%-8.4%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.0%-100.0%+8.8%+1408.6%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+85.9%-105.0%+3.1%+4.0%+92.3%
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OLB and PRTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.

MetricOLB logoOLBThe OLB Group, In…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$919,106$3.8B$451M$2.1B$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1M$7.5B$1.4B$1.8B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.08x43.39x8.10x161.18x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.41x5.78x49.50x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.53x6.95x47.80x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.07x0.91x0.47x3.40x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.29x2.13x2.71x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.63x6.01x21.41x9.97x
Evenly matched — OLB and PRTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FLYW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FLYW delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-170 for OLB. OLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs OLB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOLB logoOLBThe OLB Group, In…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-169.9%+4.4%+5.9%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-72.9%+1.0%+2.6%+4.3%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-108.7%+6.3%+13.4%+2.1%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-148.0%+6.3%+16.0%+1.3%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x2.36x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$347,613$3.7B$969M-$330M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27,436$964M$77M$330M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$375,049$4.6B$1.0B$0$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-21.60x3.40x1.51x1.84x4.64x
FLYW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $105 for OLB. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs OLB's -63.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs OLB's -60.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOLB logoOLBThe OLB Group, In…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.1%-25.2%+3.6%+27.6%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.9%-43.7%-10.4%+62.7%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.9%-24.0%+50.5%-40.1%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.9%-46.4%-15.9%-49.5%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+39.7%-43.8%-49.5%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-60.6%-8.7%+14.6%-15.7%-2.2%
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs OLB's 19.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOLB logoOLBThe OLB Group, In…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.63x1.51x2.12x1.32x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.50$108.50$8.89$18.05$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.31$39.91$4.44$9.79$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+19.8%+43.2%+62.0%+98.2%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.943.353.483.043.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded666K2.2M252K1.9M5.5M
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PRTH and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FOUR as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs FOUR's 0.72%.

MetricOLB logoOLBThe OLB Group, In…FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.36$11.00$17.50$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts2951937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.34$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+12.8%+2.3%+3.7%0.0%
Evenly matched — PRTH and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FLYW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). PRTH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallPriority Technology Holding… (PRTH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 0% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -98. 9% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +39. 7% versus OLB's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 179% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.

6% versus -58. 0% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -87. 4% for The OLB Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIS leads at 16. 5% versus -90. 9% for OLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 43. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield), FOUR (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. OLB, PRTH, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OLB and FOUR and PRTH and FLYW and FIS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FOUR, FIS pay a dividend while OLB, PRTH, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OLB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOUR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLYW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 70429%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OLB and FOUR and PRTH and FLYW and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OLB: -25.0% · FOUR: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.