Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $919K | $3.81B | $451M | $2.12B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $3.33B | $953M | $188.60B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $86M | $56M | $12.54B | $382M |
| Gross Margin | -15.7% | 35.2% | 21.4% | 0.2% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -85.3% | 11.3% | 14.8% | 5.7% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.4x | 5.8x | 49.5x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $375K | $4.62B | $1.05B | $0.00 | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27K | $964M | $77M | $330M | $599M |
OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 71.1 | -28.9% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.7 | -68.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 39.7% 10Y total return vs PRTH's -43.8%
PRTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.5x)
FLYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs OLB's -58.0%
- 6.6% margin vs OLB's -92.7%
- +62.7% vs OLB's -63.9%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 0.76 vs PRTH's 2.12
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs OLB's -58.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs OLB's -92.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs PRTH's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs OLB's -63.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs OLB's -72.9%, ROIC 2.1% vs -108.7% |
OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLYW leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRTH leads 1 • OLB leads 0 • FOUR leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 19565.2x OLB's $10M. FLYW is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OLB's -92.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $3.3B | $953M | $188.6B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $629M | $204M | $10.8B | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $86M | $56M | $12.5B | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $687M | $75M | -$15.8B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | +35.2% | +21.4% | +0.2% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -85.3% | +11.3% | +14.8% | +5.7% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -92.7% | +2.6% | +5.8% | +6.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | +20.6% | +7.9% | -8.4% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -100.0% | +8.8% | +1408.6% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.9% | -105.0% | +3.1% | +4.0% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OLB and PRTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $919,106 | $3.8B | $451M | $2.1B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $7.5B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 43.39x | 8.10x | 161.18x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.41x | 5.78x | 49.50x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.53x | 6.95x | 47.80x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.91x | 0.47x | 3.40x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 2.13x | — | 2.71x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.63x | 6.01x | 21.41x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLYW delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-170 for OLB. OLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs OLB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -169.9% | +4.4% | — | +5.9% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -72.9% | +1.0% | +2.6% | +4.3% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.7% | +6.3% | +13.4% | +2.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -148.0% | +6.3% | +16.0% | +1.3% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 2.36x | — | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $347,613 | $3.7B | $969M | -$330M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27,436 | $964M | $77M | $330M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $375,049 | $4.6B | $1.0B | $0 | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.60x | 3.40x | 1.51x | 1.84x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $105 for OLB. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs OLB's -63.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs OLB's -60.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.1% | -25.2% | +3.6% | +27.6% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.9% | -43.7% | -10.4% | +62.7% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -24.0% | +50.5% | -40.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -46.4% | -15.9% | -49.5% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +39.7% | -43.8% | -49.5% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.6% | -8.7% | +14.6% | -15.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs OLB's 19.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.51x | 2.12x | 1.32x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $108.50 | $8.89 | $18.05 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $39.91 | $4.44 | $9.79 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.8% | +43.2% | +62.0% | +98.2% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 43.3 | 53.4 | 83.0 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 666K | 2.2M | 252K | 1.9M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRTH and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOUR as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs FOUR's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $73.36 | $11.00 | $17.50 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 5 | 19 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.34 | — | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.8% | +2.3% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
FLYW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). PRTH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
OLB vs FOUR vs PRTH vs FLYW vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 0% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -98. 9% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +39. 7% versus OLB's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 179% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus -58. 0% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -87. 4% for The OLB Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIS leads at 16. 5% versus -90. 9% for OLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 43. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), FOUR (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. OLB, PRTH, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OLB or FOUR or PRTH or FLYW or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OLB and FOUR and PRTH and FLYW and FIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FOUR, FIS pay a dividend while OLB, PRTH, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.