Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OLED vs KOPN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
OLED vs KOPN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $4.43B | $769M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $627M | $46M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $214M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.6% | -26.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $43M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $14M |
OLED vs KOPN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universal Display C… (OLED) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
| Kopin Corporation (KOPN) | 100 | 472.1 | +372.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OLED vs KOPN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
- Beta 1.39, yield 1.9%, current ratio 10.06x
KOPN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.6%, EPS growth -83.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 185.5% 10Y total return vs OLED's 83.9%
- 24.6% revenue growth vs OLED's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.6% revenue growth vs OLED's 0.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.1% margin vs KOPN's -13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs KOPN's 3.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +283.6% vs OLED's -31.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs KOPN's -9.5%, ROIC 11.7% vs -172.3% |
OLED vs KOPN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OLED vs KOPN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLED is the larger business by revenue, generating $627M annually — 13.7x KOPN's $46M. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOPN's -13.5%. On growth, KOPN holds the edge at -10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $627M | $46M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $259M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $214M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $237M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | -26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.1% | -13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | -24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | -10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.7% | +186.7% |
Valuation Metrics
OLED leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $769M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $757M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.50x | -14.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.56x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.80x | 15.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.54x | 28.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OLED leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLED delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-30 for KOPN. OLED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KOPN's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLED scores 4/9 vs KOPN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | -30.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.0% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.7% | -172.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | -143.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KOPN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KOPN five years ago would be worth $6,662 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,632 for OLED. Over the past 12 months, KOPN leads with a +283.6% total return vs OLED's -31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOPN at 70.2% vs OLED's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.5% | +97.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.8% | +283.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | +393.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | -33.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.9% | +185.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | +70.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OLED and KOPN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOPN's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KOPN currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs OLED's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 3.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $163.21 | $4.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $83.64 | $1.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.6% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 814K | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OLED as "Buy" and KOPN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.0% upside for OLED (target: $141) vs 1.8% for KOPN (target: $5). OLED is the only dividend payer here at 1.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $141.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.0% |
OLED leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KOPN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OLED vs KOPN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OLED or KOPN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kopin Corporation (KOPN) is the stronger pick with 24.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Universal Display Corporation (OLED) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OLED or KOPN?
Over the past 5 years, Kopin Corporation (KOPN) delivered a total return of -33.
4%, compared to -53. 7% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOPN returned +185. 5% versus OLED's +83. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OLED or KOPN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
39β versus Kopin Corporation's 3. 50β — meaning KOPN is approximately 152% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Kopin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OLED or KOPN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kopin Corporation (KOPN) is pulling ahead at 24.
6% versus 0. 5% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Universal Display Corporation grew EPS 9. 2% year-over-year, compared to -83. 3% for Kopin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KOPN leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OLED or KOPN?
Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
2% net margin versus -87. 2% for Kopin Corporation — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -85. 6% for KOPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OLED or KOPN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OLED: 50.
0% to $141. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — OLED or KOPN?
In this comparison, OLED (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. KOPN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OLED or KOPN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
9% yield). Kopin Corporation (KOPN) carries a higher beta of 3. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +83. 9%, KOPN: +185. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OLED and KOPN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KOPN is a small-cap high-growth stock. OLED pays a dividend while KOPN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.