Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $966M | $1.26B | $6.63B | $129M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $205M | $2.51B | $2.35B | $182M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-171M | $128M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 65.6% | 69.7% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -7.6% | 4.6% | -50.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 51.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.04B | $1.12B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $781M | $229M | $182M |
OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omada Health (OMDA) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 51.5 | -48.5% |
| American Well Corpo… (AMWL) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OMDA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- beta 1.31
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 3.60x
- Beta 1.31 vs HIMS's 2.40
TDOC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs OMDA's -28.7%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0%
- 5.5% margin vs AMWL's -48.2%
AMWL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.37x
- +14.3% vs HIMS's -51.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs AMWL's -2.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs AMWL's -48.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs HIMS's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.3% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -95.1% |
OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories
TDOC leads 1 • OMDA leads 0 • AMWL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 13.8x AMWL's $182M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMWL's -48.2%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $205M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $182M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $42M | $164M | -$59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$171M | $128M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $251M | $73M | -$42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +65.6% | +69.7% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -7.6% | +4.6% | -50.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -6.8% | +5.5% | -48.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +10.0% | +3.1% | -22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -2.5% | +28.4% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +32.1% | -27.3% | +44.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TDOC's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $966M | $1.3B | $6.6B | $129M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $744M | $1.5B | $7.5B | -$48M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -74.55x | -6.11x | 50.32x | -1.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 51.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.13x | 42.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 0.50x | 2.82x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.17x | 0.89x | 12.25x | 0.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 57.08x | 4.40x | 89.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AMWL. AMWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDOC scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.5% | -12.4% | +23.7% | -33.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | -5.9% | +6.0% | -25.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.9% | -11.5% | +10.7% | -95.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.3% | -10.0% | +10.9% | -36.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.75x | 2.07x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$222M | $259M | $892M | -$178M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $781M | $229M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.0B | $1.1B | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.47x | -8.76x | — | -239.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for AMWL. Over the past 12 months, AMWL leads with a +14.3% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs AMWL's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.1% | -1.3% | -23.2% | +59.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.7% | +1.5% | -51.0% | +14.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | -73.3% | +116.6% | -80.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | -95.4% | +137.6% | -97.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | -41.1% | +161.9% | -98.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | -35.6% | +29.4% | -42.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMDA and AMWL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWL currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.91x | 2.40x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.40 | $9.77 | $70.43 | $9.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.28 | $4.40 | $13.74 | $3.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +71.2% | +36.4% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.5 | 74.1 | 54.5 | 67.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 5.5M | 34.9M | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OMDA as "Buy", TDOC as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.6% upside for OMDA (target: $22) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.40 | $7.58 | $29.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 42 | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.0% |
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OMDA vs TDOC vs HIMS vs AMWL: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (51. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Omada Health (OMDA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -97. 2% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus AMWL's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omada Health (OMDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
31β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 84% more volatile than OMDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Well Corporation (AMWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -38. 4% for American Well Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -42. 2% for AMWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDOC leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMDA: 36.
6% to $22. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is OMDA or TDOC or HIMS or AMWL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omada Health (OMDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMDA: -28. 7%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OMDA and TDOC and HIMS and AMWL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OMDA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.