Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OMER
Omeros Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.03B
5Y Perf.-1.6%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-54.6%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.98B
5Y Perf.+1.3%

OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OMER logoOMER
RARE logoRARE
ACAD logoACAD
FOLD logoFOLD
CRL logoCRL
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$1.03B$2.57B$3.86B$4.55B$8.98B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$669M$1.10B$634M$4.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-121M$-609M$376M$-27M$-185M
Gross Margin83.6%91.5%87.9%24.9%
Operating Margin-83.9%7.4%5.2%11.8%
Forward P/E50.9x40.6x16.4x
Total Debt$207M$1.28B$52M$483M$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$434M$178M$214M$214M

OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OMER
RARE
ACAD
FOLD
CRL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Omeros Corporation (OMER)10098.4-1.6%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10045.4-54.6%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)100101.3+1.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD and FOLD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. RARE and CRL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OMER
Omeros Corporation
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, OMER doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Income Pick

RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.42
  • Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • 20.1% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
  • 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
  • 26.2% ROA vs OMER's -53.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -72.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • 119.2% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
  • Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.63 vs CRL's 1.52
  • +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Value Play

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (16.4x vs 40.6x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRARE logoRARE20.1% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
ValueCRL logoCRLLower P/E (16.4x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.63 vs CRL's 1.52
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+137.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs OMER's -53.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -72.4%

OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OMEROmeros Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M

OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRL and OMER operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOMER logoOMEROmeros CorporationRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$669M$1.1B$634M$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$127M-$536M$96M$40M$757M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$121M-$609M$376M-$27M-$185M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$105M-$487M$212M$30M$391M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.6%+91.5%+87.9%+24.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-83.9%+7.4%+5.2%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-91.0%+34.3%-4.3%-4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-72.8%+19.4%+4.7%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.4%+9.7%+23.7%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.1%-17.2%-81.8%-89.0%-160.0%
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricOMER logoOMEROmeros CorporationRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$2.6B$3.9B$4.5B$9.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$3.4B$3.7B$4.8B$11.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.42x-4.48x9.85x-164.85x-62.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.50.91x40.62x16.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.91x114.88x12.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.82x3.61x7.17x2.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.15x16.29x2.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.74x152.43x17.31x
CRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs OMER's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOMER logoOMEROmeros CorporationRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.1%+35.6%-12.0%-5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.9%-45.8%+26.2%-3.2%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-72.4%-89.4%+10.0%+5.3%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-64.8%-46.4%+10.1%+5.1%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934644
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x1.76x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$204M$842M-$126M$269M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$434M$178M$214M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$207M$1.3B$52M$483M$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.80x-14.49x1.00x6.38x
ACAD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FOLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $14,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OMER at 43.1% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOMER logoOMEROmeros CorporationRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.6%+10.7%-13.7%+1.5%-10.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+130.6%-21.8%+52.4%+137.9%+32.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+192.8%-44.5%+4.7%+19.0%-4.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.5%-77.2%+7.1%+48.6%-46.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+16.6%-59.4%-22.9%+119.2%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+43.1%-17.8%+1.5%+6.0%-1.4%
FOLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOMER logoOMEROmeros CorporationRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x1.42x1.26x0.63x1.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.65$42.37$27.81$14.50$228.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.95$18.29$14.45$5.51$131.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.9%+61.7%+81.1%+99.9%+79.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.566.644.272.257.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M1.8M1.8M3.0M806K
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: OMER as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for OMER (target: $40) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricOMER logoOMEROmeros CorporationRARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.00$51.50$34.78$14.50$205.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts1933372436
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOLD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OMER vs RARE vs ACAD vs FOLD vs CRL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Omeros Corporation (OMER) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL?

On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 141% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 34. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMER: 173. 2% to $40. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is OMER or RARE or ACAD or FOLD or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OMER and RARE and ACAD and FOLD and CRL?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OMER is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OMER

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.