Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OMH vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
OMH vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $23M | $4.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-1.30B |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 8.0% |
| Operating Margin | -39.9% | -6.6% |
| Total Debt | $775K | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $962M |
OMH vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 297.2 | +197.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMH vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OMH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.25
- Rev growth 117.5%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 0.93x
OPEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -51.6% 10Y total return vs OMH's -97.5%
- -29.7% margin vs OMH's -42.2%
- +6.1% vs OMH's -71.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.5% FFO/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -29.7% margin vs OMH's -42.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs OMH's -71.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -54.0% ROA vs OMH's -74.6%, ROIC -16.6% vs -61.1% |
OMH vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OMH vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OMH and OPEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 214.5x OMH's $20M. OPEN is the more profitable business, keeping -29.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMH's -42.2%. On growth, OMH holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +8.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -39.9% | -6.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | -29.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | -32.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | -7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
OPEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.26x | -3.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.34x | 3.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPEN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OPEN delivers a -129.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-129 in annual profit, vs $-156 for OMH. OMH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPEN's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMH scores 6/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -155.5% | -129.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -74.6% | -54.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.1% | -16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.9% | -12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$370,983 | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $774,846 | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -112.25x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPEN five years ago would be worth $2,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $245 for OMH. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +607.7% total return vs OMH's -71.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 43.0% vs OMH's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.1% | +607.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +192.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -72.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.9% | +43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMH and OPEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMH is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPEN currently trades 48.1% from its 52-week high vs OMH's 26.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.75 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.1% | +48.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 36.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +23.7% |
OPEN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
OMH vs OPEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMH or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is the stronger pick with 117.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Analysts rate Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) a "Hold" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OMH or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) delivered a total return of -72. 4%, compared to -97. 5% for Ohmyhome Limited (OMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPEN returned -51. 6% versus OMH's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OMH or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
25β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 1145% more volatile than OMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 19% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OMH or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is pulling ahead at 117.
5% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ohmyhome Limited grew EPS 28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMH leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OMH or OPEN?
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) is the more profitable company, earning -29. 7% net margin versus -39. 8% for Ohmyhome Limited — meaning it keeps -29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPEN leads at -6. 6% versus -40. 3% for OMH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMH leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OMH or OPEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OMH or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
25)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMH: -97. 5%, OPEN: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OMH and OPEN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OMH is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.