Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $22M | $5.19B | $5.19B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $4.37B | $8.31B | $5.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-1.30B | $14M | $-128M |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 8.0% | 10.8% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -39.9% | -6.6% | -4.2% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 56.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $775K | $193M | $454M | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $962M | $199M | $118M |
OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 309.1 | +209.1% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 268.2 | +168.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OMH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.25
- Rev growth 117.5%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 0.93x
OPEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- +6.8% vs OMH's -70.7%
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 0.2% margin vs OMH's -42.2%
- 0.4% ROA vs OMH's -74.6%, ROIC -2.5% vs -61.1%
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -35.0% 10Y total return vs OPEN's -49.6%
- 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.5% FFO/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs OMH's -42.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.8% vs OMH's -70.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs OMH's -74.6%, ROIC -2.5% vs -61.1% |
OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOUS leads in 2 of 6 categories
COMP leads 1 • OMH leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 407.8x OMH's $20M. COMP is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMH's -42.2%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $4.4B | $8.3B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$287M | -$100M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$1.3B | $14M | -$128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $1.0B | $16M | -$41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +8.0% | +10.8% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -39.9% | -6.6% | -4.2% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | -29.7% | +0.2% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | +23.7% | +0.2% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | -32.1% | +99.4% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | -7.9% | +133.3% | -2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HOUS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOUS's 18.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 65.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $5.2B | $5.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $4.4B | $5.4B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.04x | -3.20x | -92.40x | -15.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 56.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 65.33x | 18.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 1.19x | 0.75x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.19x | 4.15x | 6.71x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.00x | 25.55x | 76.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OMH and HOUS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COMP delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-156 for OMH. OMH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMH scores 6/9 vs HOUS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -155.5% | -129.4% | +1.1% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -74.6% | -54.0% | +0.4% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.1% | -16.6% | -2.5% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.9% | -12.3% | -2.9% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.19x | 0.58x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$370,983 | -$769M | $255M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $962M | $199M | $118M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $774,846 | $193M | $454M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -112.25x | — | -0.12x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOUS five years ago would be worth $9,871 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $237 for OMH. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +675.8% total return vs OMH's -70.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 51.8% vs OMH's -84.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | -10.4% | -12.0% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -70.7% | +675.8% | +19.4% | +375.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +165.4% | +250.0% | +227.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -69.5% | -44.0% | -1.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -49.6% | -54.1% | -35.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.6% | +38.4% | +51.8% | +48.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMH and HOUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMH is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs OMH's 27.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 3.09x | 1.79x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.45 | $10.87 | $13.96 | $18.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $0.51 | $5.66 | $3.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.5% | +50.0% | +66.2% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 51.8 | 42.3 | 77.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 36.3M | 14.5M | 11.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPEN as "Hold", COMP as "Buy", HOUS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.7% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). HOUS is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 | $14.29 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +22.8% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HOUS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). COMP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
OMH vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is the stronger pick with 117.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 3%, compared to -97. 6% for Ohmyhome Limited (OMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOUS returned -35. 0% versus OMH's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
25β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 1145% more volatile than OMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is pulling ahead at 117.
5% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMH leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 8% net margin versus -39. 8% for Ohmyhome Limited — meaning it keeps -0. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -40. 3% for OMH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMH leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 54.
7% to $14. 29.
07Which pays a better dividend — OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
In this comparison, HOUS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. OMH, OPEN, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OMH or OPEN or COMP or HOUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ohmyhome Limited (OMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
25)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMH: -97. 6%, OPEN: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OMH and OPEN and COMP and HOUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OMH (Real Estate) and OPEN (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and HOUS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OMH is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.