Medical - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Distribution | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $171M | $1.16B | $3.65B | $2.04B | $97.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.76B | $716M | $1.54B | $674M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.10B | $-69M | $139M | $-173M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.4% | 48.7% | 75.2% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | -8.4% | 12.2% | -27.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 2.3x | 24.8x | 15.1x | — | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $320M | $129M | $898M | $290M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $282M | $90M | $449M | $103M | $2.22B |
OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) | 100 | 28.2 | -71.8% |
| Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 180.2 | +80.2% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 18.4 | -81.6% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 104.4 | +4.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (2.3x vs 13.8x)
AVNS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +97.1% vs OMI's -68.0%
MMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 209.3% 10Y total return vs MDT's 24.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
- Beta 0.66, current ratio 4.34x
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 3.7%
- 13.0% margin vs OMI's -39.8%
- Beta 0.42 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
- 3.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% revenue growth vs OMI's -74.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs OMI's -39.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.1% vs OMI's -68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs OMI's -44.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 1.8% |
OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OMI leads in 1 of 6 categories
MMSI leads 1 • AVNS leads 1 • MDT leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NVCR and MDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 52.6x NVCR's $674M. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMI's -39.8%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $716M | $1.5B | $674M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $277M | -$21M | $290M | -$165M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.1B | -$69M | $139M | -$173M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$353M | $24M | $274M | -$48M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.4% | +48.7% | +75.2% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | -8.4% | +12.2% | -27.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.8% | -9.7% | +9.0% | -25.7% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | +3.4% | +17.8% | -7.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -146.3% | +8.8% | +7.8% | +12.3% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | -21.4% | +38.8% | -100.0% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
OMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 27% valuation discount to MMSI's 28.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OMI's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MDT's 14.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $171M | $1.2B | $3.7B | $2.0B | $97.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $209M | $1.2B | $4.1B | $2.2B | $123.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | -16.99x | 28.77x | -14.66x | 21.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.31x | 24.80x | 15.05x | — | 13.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 35.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.70x | — | 12.87x | — | 14.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 1.66x | 2.41x | 3.11x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.48x | 2.34x | 5.86x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.94x | 16.95x | — | 18.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-21 for OMI. AVNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMSI scores 6/9 vs OMI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.1% | -8.9% | +8.9% | -50.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.9% | -6.6% | +5.2% | -16.5% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | -5.4% | +7.2% | -16.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | -6.5% | +7.9% | -28.9% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x | 0.57x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38M | $39M | $450M | $187M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $282M | $90M | $449M | $103M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $320M | $129M | $898M | $290M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.12x | -16.71x | 10.74x | -96.80x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMSI five years ago would be worth $9,727 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $672 for OMI. Over the past 12 months, AVNS leads with a +97.1% total return vs OMI's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVNS at 1.9% vs OMI's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | +121.8% | -29.1% | +36.4% | -20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.0% | +97.1% | -36.2% | +2.6% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | +5.8% | -27.8% | -74.2% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | -36.9% | -2.7% | -90.2% | -29.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.2% | -16.9% | +209.3% | +38.5% | +24.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.9% | +1.9% | -10.3% | -36.4% | -2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVNS and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVNS currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs OMI's 23.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.59x | 0.66x | 2.15x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.55 | $24.81 | $100.19 | $20.06 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.84 | $9.30 | $59.74 | $9.82 | $75.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.5% | +100.0% | +61.2% | +89.2% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 90.9 | 37.3 | 70.9 | 29.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 690K | 1.3M | 758K | 1.4M | 7.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OMI as "Hold", AVNS as "Hold", MMSI as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 596.4% upside for OMI (target: $16) vs -7.3% for AVNS (target: $23). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.60 | $23.00 | $95.00 | $33.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 8 | 14 | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.3% |
OMI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MMSI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 2% for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
1x versus Merit Medical Systems, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, Owens & Minor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) delivered a total return of -2. 7%, compared to -93. 3% for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +209. 3% versus OMI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -74. 2% for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avanos Medical, Inc. grew EPS 82. 9% year-over-year, compared to -201. 1% for Owens & Minor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?
Medtronic plc (MDT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -39. 8% for Owens & Minor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Owens & Minor, Inc.
(OMI) trades at 2. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Avanos Medical, Inc. — 22. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMI: 596. 4% to $15. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
7% yield) pays a dividend. OMI, AVNS, MMSI, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42), 3. 7% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMI and AVNS and MMSI and NVCR and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OMI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while OMI, AVNS, MMSI, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.