Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OMI
Owens & Minor, Inc.

Medical - Distribution

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$171M
5Y Perf.-71.8%
AVNS
Avanos Medical, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.16B
5Y Perf.-54.2%
MMSI
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.65B
5Y Perf.+80.2%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$2.04B
5Y Perf.-81.6%
MDT
Medtronic plc

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • IE
Market Cap$97.62B
5Y Perf.+4.4%

OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OMI logoOMI
AVNS logoAVNS
MMSI logoMMSI
NVCR logoNVCR
MDT logoMDT
IndustryMedical - DistributionMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$171M$1.16B$3.65B$2.04B$97.62B
Revenue (TTM)$2.76B$716M$1.54B$674M$35.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.10B$-69M$139M$-173M$4.61B
Gross Margin49.4%48.7%75.2%61.9%
Operating Margin1.0%-8.4%12.2%-27.2%17.9%
Forward P/E2.3x24.8x15.1x13.8x
Total Debt$320M$129M$898M$290M$28.52B
Cash & Equiv.$282M$90M$449M$103M$2.22B

OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OMI
AVNS
MMSI
NVCR
MDT
StockMay 20Feb 26Return
Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI)10028.2-71.8%
Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS)10045.8-54.2%
Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI)100180.2+80.2%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10018.4-81.6%
Medtronic plc (MDT)100104.4+4.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MDT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Owens & Minor, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. AVNS and MMSI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OMI
Owens & Minor, Inc.
The Value Play

OMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (2.3x vs 13.8x)
Best for: value
AVNS
Avanos Medical, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

AVNS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +97.1% vs OMI's -68.0%
Best for: momentum
MMSI
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

MMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
  • 209.3% 10Y total return vs MDT's 24.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
  • Beta 0.66, current ratio 4.34x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MDT
Medtronic plc
The Income Pick

MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 3.7%
  • 13.0% margin vs OMI's -39.8%
  • Beta 0.42 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
  • 3.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMMSI logoMMSI11.7% revenue growth vs OMI's -74.2%
ValueOMI logoOMILower P/E (2.3x vs 13.8x)
Quality / MarginsMDT logoMDT13.0% margin vs OMI's -39.8%
Stability / SafetyMDT logoMDTBeta 0.42 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
DividendsMDT logoMDT3.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AVNS logoAVNS+97.1% vs OMI's -68.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MDT logoMDT175.8% ROA vs OMI's -44.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 1.8%

OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OMIOwens & Minor, Inc.
FY 2025
Diabetes Product
56.9%$783M
Product and Service, Other
20.9%$288M
Wound Care
13.7%$189M
Urology
8.4%$116M
AVNSAvanos Medical, Inc.
FY 2025
Corporate Other
100.0%$31M
MMSIMerit Medical Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Cardiovascular
95.2%$1.4B
Endoscopy
4.8%$73M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

MDTMedtronic plc
FY 2025
Cardiac and Vascular Group
37.3%$12.5B
Neuroscience Group
29.4%$9.8B
Medical Surgical
25.1%$8.4B
Diabetes Group
8.2%$2.8B

OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOMILAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NVCR and MDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 52.6x NVCR's $674M. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OMI's -39.8%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOMI logoOMIOwens & Minor, In…AVNS logoAVNSAvanos Medical, I…MMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.8B$716M$1.5B$674M$35.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$277M-$21M$290M-$165M$9.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.1B-$69M$139M-$173M$4.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$353M$24M$274M-$48M$5.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.4%+48.7%+75.2%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.0%-8.4%+12.2%-27.2%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-39.8%-9.7%+9.0%-25.7%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.8%+3.4%+17.8%-7.1%+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-146.3%+8.8%+7.8%+12.3%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%-21.4%+38.8%-100.0%-11.9%
Evenly matched — NVCR and MDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.1x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 27% valuation discount to MMSI's 28.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OMI's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MDT's 14.1x.

MetricOMI logoOMIOwens & Minor, In…AVNS logoAVNSAvanos Medical, I…MMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Market CapShares × price$171M$1.2B$3.7B$2.0B$97.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$209M$1.2B$4.1B$2.2B$123.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.16x-16.99x28.77x-14.66x21.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.31x24.80x15.05x13.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate35.17x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.70x12.87x14.06x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.06x1.66x2.41x3.11x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.48x2.34x5.86x2.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.94x16.95x18.83x
OMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-21 for OMI. AVNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMSI scores 6/9 vs OMI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOMI logoOMIOwens & Minor, In…AVNS logoAVNSAvanos Medical, I…MMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-21.1%-8.9%+8.9%-50.8%+9.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.9%-6.6%+5.2%-16.5%+175.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.8%-5.4%+7.2%-16.4%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%-6.5%+7.9%-28.9%+7.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.57x0.85x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$38M$39M$450M$187M$26.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$282M$90M$449M$103M$2.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$320M$129M$898M$290M$28.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.12x-16.71x10.74x-96.80x9.08x
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AVNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MMSI five years ago would be worth $9,727 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $672 for OMI. Over the past 12 months, AVNS leads with a +97.1% total return vs OMI's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVNS at 1.9% vs OMI's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOMI logoOMIOwens & Minor, In…AVNS logoAVNSAvanos Medical, I…MMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.4%+121.8%-29.1%+36.4%-20.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-68.0%+97.1%-36.2%+2.6%-5.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+5.8%-27.8%-74.2%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.3%-36.9%-2.7%-90.2%-29.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.2%-16.9%+209.3%+38.5%+24.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-49.9%+1.9%-10.3%-36.4%-2.1%
AVNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AVNS and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVNS currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs OMI's 23.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOMI logoOMIOwens & Minor, In…AVNS logoAVNSAvanos Medical, I…MMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.45x1.59x0.66x2.15x0.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.55$24.81$100.19$20.06$106.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.84$9.30$59.74$9.82$75.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+23.5%+100.0%+61.2%+89.2%+71.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.590.937.370.929.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded690K1.3M758K1.4M7.9M
Evenly matched — AVNS and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: OMI as "Hold", AVNS as "Hold", MMSI as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 596.4% upside for OMI (target: $16) vs -7.3% for AVNS (target: $23). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOMI logoOMIOwens & Minor, In…AVNS logoAVNSAvanos Medical, I…MMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMDT logoMDTMedtronic plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.60$23.00$95.00$33.50$109.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts108141549
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0136
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.78
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%0.0%0.0%+3.3%
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OMI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MMSI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallOwens & Minor, Inc. (OMI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OMI vs AVNS vs MMSI vs NVCR vs MDT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 2% for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?

On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.

1x versus Merit Medical Systems, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, Owens & Minor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?

Over the past 5 years, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

(MMSI) delivered a total return of -2. 7%, compared to -93. 3% for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +209. 3% versus OMI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -74. 2% for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avanos Medical, Inc. grew EPS 82. 9% year-over-year, compared to -201. 1% for Owens & Minor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?

Medtronic plc (MDT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus -39. 8% for Owens & Minor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Owens & Minor, Inc.

(OMI) trades at 2. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Avanos Medical, Inc. — 22. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMI: 596. 4% to $15. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT?

In this comparison, MDT (3.

7% yield) pays a dividend. OMI, AVNS, MMSI, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OMI or AVNS or MMSI or NVCR or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

42), 3. 7% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OMI and AVNS and MMSI and NVCR and MDT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OMI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while OMI, AVNS, MMSI, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OMI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVNS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MMSI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OMI and AVNS and MMSI and NVCR and MDT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OMI: -146.3% · AVNS: 8.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.