Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ONB vs FNB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
ONB vs FNB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.34B | $6.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.71B | $2.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $669M | $565M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 62.3% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $7.45B | $3.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.83B | $2.50B |
ONB vs FNB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp (ONB) | 100 | 177.9 | +77.9% |
| F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) | 100 | 241.8 | +141.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONB vs FNB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 25.5%, EPS growth 6.5%
- 137.0% 10Y total return vs FNB's 78.8%
- NIM 2.9% vs FNB's 2.8%
FNB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 58.0%, current ratio 1.01x
- PEG 0.81 vs ONB's 1.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% NII/revenue growth vs FNB's 4.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.81 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ONB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs ONB's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.3% vs ONB's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ONB's 0.4% |
ONB vs FNB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ONB vs FNB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FNB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONB and FNB operate at a comparable scale, with $3.7B and $2.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.0% (FNB) to 18.0% (ONB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $978M | $724M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $669M | $565M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $660M | $277M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +62.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +21.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | +56.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FNB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, FNB trades at a 15% valuation discount to ONB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FNB offers better value at 0.89x vs ONB's 2.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.0B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.51x | 11.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.27x | 10.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.39x | 0.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.30x | 11.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.52x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FNB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONB delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for FNB. FNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONB's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FNB scores 7/9 vs ONB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ONB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FNB five years ago would be worth $15,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,836 for ONB. Over the past 12 months, FNB leads with a +36.3% total return vs ONB's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ONB at 27.6% vs FNB's 22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.5% | +36.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.9% | +83.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.4% | +50.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.0% | +78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +22.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FNB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FNB is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONB's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.17 | $19.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.39 | $13.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 7.2M |
Analyst Outlook
FNB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ONB as "Hold" and FNB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for FNB (target: $21) vs 12.4% for ONB (target: $27). ONB is the only dividend payer here at 2.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.17 | $20.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% |
FNB leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ONB leads in 1 (Total Returns).
ONB vs FNB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONB or FNB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Old National Bancorp (ONB) is the stronger pick with 25.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for F. N. B. Corporation (FNB). F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONB or FNB?
On trailing P/E, F.
N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Old National Bancorp at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Old National Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: F. N. B. Corporation wins at 0. 81x versus Old National Bancorp's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONB or FNB?
Over the past 5 years, F.
N. B. Corporation (FNB) delivered a total return of +50. 2%, compared to +38. 4% for Old National Bancorp (ONB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONB returned +137. 0% versus FNB's +78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONB or FNB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), F.
N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Old National Bancorp's 1. 23β — meaning ONB is approximately 1% more volatile than FNB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 88% for Old National Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONB or FNB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old National Bancorp (ONB) is pulling ahead at 25.
5% versus 4. 9% for F. N. B. Corporation (FNB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: F. N. B. Corporation grew EPS 22. 8% year-over-year, compared to 6. 5% for Old National Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONB or FNB?
F.
N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 18. 0% for Old National Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FNB leads at 24. 8% versus 23. 6% for ONB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONB leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONB or FNB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Old National Bancorp's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Old National Bancorp (ONB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for F. N. B. Corporation — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNB: 14. 4% to $20. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONB or FNB?
In this comparison, ONB (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. FNB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ONB or FNB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old National Bancorp (ONB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23), 2. 4% yield, +137. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONB: +137. 0%, FNB: +78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONB and FNB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FNB is a small-cap deep-value stock. ONB pays a dividend while FNB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.