Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ONB vs WTFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
ONB vs WTFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.49B | $10.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.71B | $4.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $669M | $824M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $7.45B | $4.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.83B | $468M |
ONB vs WTFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old National Bancorp (ONB) | 100 | 180.8 | +80.8% |
| Wintrust Financial … (WTFC) | 100 | 361.9 | +261.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONB vs WTFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.5%, EPS growth 6.5%
- 25.5% NII/revenue growth vs WTFC's 6.7%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x)
WTFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.16
- 227.7% 10Y total return vs ONB's 141.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 61.7%, current ratio 0.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% NII/revenue growth vs WTFC's 6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ONB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs ONB's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.5% vs ONB's +19.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ONB's 0.4% |
ONB vs WTFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ONB vs WTFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTFC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTFC and ONB operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $3.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.5% (WTFC) to 18.0% (ONB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $978M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $669M | $824M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $660M | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | +25.5% |
Valuation Metrics
WTFC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, WTFC trades at a 3% valuation discount to ONB's 13.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTFC offers better value at 0.67x vs ONB's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.1B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.73x | 13.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.42x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.43x | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.46x | 11.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.90x | 11.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTFC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTFC delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for ONB. WTFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONB's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WTFC scores 6/9 vs ONB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $468M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTFC five years ago would be worth $20,605 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,978 for ONB. Over the past 12 months, WTFC leads with a +36.5% total return vs ONB's +19.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTFC at 35.9% vs ONB's 28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.2% | +36.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.1% | +151.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.8% | +106.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.4% | +227.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +35.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WTFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTFC is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONB's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.17 | $162.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.39 | $113.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 438K |
Analyst Outlook
WTFC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ONB as "Hold" and WTFC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.9% upside for WTFC (target: $175) vs 10.6% for ONB (target: $27). ONB is the only dividend payer here at 2.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.17 | $174.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% |
WTFC leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
ONB vs WTFC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONB or WTFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Old National Bancorp (ONB) is the stronger pick with 25.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC). Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONB or WTFC?
On trailing P/E, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the cheapest at 13.
3x versus Old National Bancorp at 13. 7x. On forward P/E, Old National Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wintrust Financial Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus Old National Bancorp's 1. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONB or WTFC?
Over the past 5 years, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) delivered a total return of +106.
0%, compared to +39. 8% for Old National Bancorp (ONB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTFC returned +227. 7% versus ONB's +141. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONB or WTFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
16β versus Old National Bancorp's 1. 23β — meaning ONB is approximately 6% more volatile than WTFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 88% for Old National Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONB or WTFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old National Bancorp (ONB) is pulling ahead at 25.
5% versus 6. 7% for Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wintrust Financial Corporation grew EPS 12. 1% year-over-year, compared to 6. 5% for Old National Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONB or WTFC?
Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
5% net margin versus 18. 0% for Old National Bancorp — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTFC leads at 26. 4% versus 23. 6% for ONB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONB leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONB or WTFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Old National Bancorp's 1. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Old National Bancorp (ONB) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Wintrust Financial Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WTFC: 13. 9% to $174. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONB or WTFC?
In this comparison, ONB (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. WTFC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ONB or WTFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old National Bancorp (ONB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23), 2. 4% yield, +141. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONB: +141. 4%, WTFC: +227. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONB and WTFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONB is a small-cap high-growth stock; WTFC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ONB pays a dividend while WTFC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.