Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ONEW vs BC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
ONEW vs BC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $198M | $5.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.88B | $5.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-110M | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $964M | $2.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $275M |
ONEW vs BC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| Brunswick Corporati… (BC) | 100 | 146.8 | +46.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONEW vs BC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONEW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth -17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.4%
- 5.6% revenue growth vs BC's 2.4%
BC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 2.1%
- 96.4% 10Y total return vs ONEW's -9.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 1.44x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.6% revenue growth vs BC's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.0x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.5% margin vs ONEW's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs ONEW's 1.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ONEW's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.7% vs ONEW's -1.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.5% ROA vs ONEW's -7.3%, ROIC -0.8% vs 3.6% |
ONEW vs BC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ONEW vs BC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 2.9x ONEW's $1.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.5% (BC) to -5.9% (ONEW). On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$110M | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $341M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.0% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ONEW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ONEW's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $198M | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $7.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.65x | -38.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.77x | 18.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.26x | 29.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.51x | 13.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BC delivers a -5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-33 for ONEW. BC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONEW's 3.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BC scores 4/9 vs ONEW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.0% | -5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.38x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $912M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $275M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $964M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.63x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BC five years ago would be worth $7,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,568 for ONEW. Over the past 12 months, BC leads with a +79.7% total return vs ONEW's -1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BC at 1.2% vs ONEW's -24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.3% | +79.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | +3.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | -23.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | +96.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BC is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONEW's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BC currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs ONEW's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.92 | $90.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.12 | $45.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.6% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 147K | 886K |
Analyst Outlook
BC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ONEW as "Buy" and BC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for ONEW (target: $14) vs 9.9% for BC (target: $89). For income investors, BC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.12% vs ONEW's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $88.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% |
BC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ONEW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ONEW vs BC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONEW or BC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Brunswick Corporation (BC). Analysts rate OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ONEW or BC?
Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -23.
5%, compared to -74. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BC returned +96. 4% versus ONEW's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ONEW or BC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
69β versus OneWater Marine Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning ONEW is approximately 17% more volatile than BC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brunswick Corporation (BC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 149% versus 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ONEW or BC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OneWater Marine Inc.
(ONEW) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus 2. 4% for Brunswick Corporation (BC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brunswick Corporation grew EPS -207. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1751. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONEW leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ONEW or BC?
Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the more profitable company, earning -2.
6% net margin versus -6. 1% for OneWater Marine Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONEW leads at 3. 3% versus -0. 7% for BC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BC leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ONEW or BC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brunswick Corporation (BC) trades at 19.
0x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for OneWater Marine Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONEW: 17. 3% to $14. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ONEW or BC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brunswick Corporation (BC) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 1% for OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW).
08Is ONEW or BC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.
1% yield). OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BC: +96. 4%, ONEW: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ONEW and BC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BC pays a dividend while ONEW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.