Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $3M | $339M | $3.10B | $1.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $219M | $1.04B | $114.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $24M | $84M | $9.32B |
| Gross Margin | 0.6% | 42.1% | 33.0% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | -97.3% | 21.8% | 13.6% | 0.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | 7.2x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $638M | $1.07B | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $125M | $500M | $56M |
OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OceanPal Inc. (OP) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX) | 100 | 64.5 | -35.5% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 127.7 | +27.7% |
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 168.1 | +68.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 64.5%
- Rev growth 35.6%, EPS growth 31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 168.1%
- Beta 0.99, yield 64.5%, current ratio 2.77x
- 35.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
DSX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.0x)
- 11.2% margin vs OP's -96.7%
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs GNK's 411.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.74 vs DSX's 1.46, lower leverage
GNK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- +98.8% vs OP's -97.7%
- 3.0% ROA vs OP's -21.3%, ROIC 0.7% vs -17.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs OP's -96.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs DSX's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 64.5% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.8% vs OP's -97.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs OP's -21.3%, ROIC 0.7% vs -17.5% |
OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DSX leads in 2 of 6 categories
GNK leads 1 • OP leads 1 • SBLK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DSX and GNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 5901.7x OP's $19M. DSX is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OP's -96.7%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $219M | $1.0B | $114.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $93M | $311M | $112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $24M | $84M | $9.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $0 | $209M | -$173M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +42.1% | +33.0% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -97.3% | +21.8% | +13.6% | +0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -96.7% | +11.2% | +8.1% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.0% | +26.0% | +20.0% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.3% | -9.8% | -2.7% | +1604.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.1% | +172.5% | +58.3% | +175.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DSX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, SBLK trades at a 20% valuation discount to DSX's 46.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DSX's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $339M | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$5M | $852M | $3.7B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.22x | 46.09x | 36.75x | -259.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.86x | 7.17x | 14.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.22x | 11.88x | 14.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 1.49x | 2.97x | 3.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.64x | 1.26x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.72x | 14.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DSX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DSX delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-23 for OP. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DSX's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DSX scores 6/9 vs OP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.2% | +4.9% | +3.4% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.3% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.5% | +4.3% | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.4% | +5.4% | +4.0% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.26x | 0.44x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $513M | $572M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $125M | $500M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $638M | $1.1B | $200M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -141.83x | 1.40x | 2.08x | 0.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $20,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for OP. Over the past 12 months, GNK leads with a +98.8% total return vs OP's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNK at 27.6% vs OP's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.4% | +61.9% | +40.4% | +43.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.7% | +97.8% | +79.2% | +98.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -7.1% | +60.7% | +108.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +16.2% | +82.4% | +100.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +60.1% | +977.9% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.1% | -2.4% | +17.1% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBLK and GNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DSX's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs OP's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.46x | 0.74x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1585.00 | $2.77 | $27.20 | $26.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.12 | $1.38 | $14.85 | $12.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +97.8% | +98.6% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 61.7 | 71.5 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 307K | 666K | 1.4M | 408K |
Analyst Outlook
OP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DSX as "Hold", SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for GNK (target: $29) vs 8.1% for SBLK (target: $29). For income investors, OP offers the higher dividend yield at 64.53% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $29.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +64.5% | +9.0% | +1.1% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.48 | $0.24 | $0.30 | $0.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
DSX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
OP vs DSX vs SBLK vs GNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OceanPal Inc.
(OP) is the stronger pick with 35. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK?
On trailing P/E, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Diana Shipping Inc. at 46. 1x. On forward P/E, Diana Shipping Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK?
Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +100.
2%, compared to -99. 5% for OceanPal Inc. (OP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 9% versus OP's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Diana Shipping Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning DSX is approximately 96% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 126% for Diana Shipping Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OceanPal Inc.
(OP) is pulling ahead at 35. 6% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OceanPal Inc. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, OP leads at 168. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK?
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -69. 5% for OceanPal Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSX leads at 25. 8% versus -70. 2% for OP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DSX leads at 57. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diana Shipping Inc.
(DSX) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 0x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GNK: 11. 9% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OceanPal Inc. (OP) offers the highest yield at 64. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is OP or DSX or SBLK or GNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +977. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 9%, DSX: +60. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OP and DSX and SBLK and GNK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OP is a small-cap high-growth stock; DSX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.