Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OP
OceanPal Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$529.86B
5Y Perf.-52.8%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19.12B
5Y Perf.+556.1%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+27.6%

OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OP logoOP
SPIR logoSPIR
ASTS logoASTS
SBLK logoSBLK
IndustryMarine ShippingSpecialty Business ServicesCommunication EquipmentMarine Shipping
Market Cap$2M$529.86B$19.12B$3.09B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$72M$71M$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-25.02B$-342M$84M
Gross Margin0.6%40.8%53.4%33.0%
Operating Margin-97.3%-121.4%-405.7%13.6%
Forward P/E10.0x8.0x
Total Debt$0.00$8.76B$32M$1.07B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$24.81B$2.34B$500M

OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OP
SPIR
ASTS
SBLK
StockNov 21May 26Return
OceanPal Inc. (OP)1000.0-100.0%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10047.2-52.8%
AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS)100656.1+556.1%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100127.6+27.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SBLK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AST SpaceMobile, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. OP also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OP
OceanPal Inc.
The Income Pick

OP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 66.2%
  • Rev growth 35.6%, EPS growth 31.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 168.1%
  • Beta 0.89, yield 66.2%, current ratio 2.77x
  • 66.2% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Angle

SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
  • 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
  • +158.1% vs OP's -97.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs ASTS's 5.7%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 8.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
  • Beta 0.73 vs SPIR's 2.93
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthASTS logoASTS15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueSBLK logoSBLKBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSBLK logoSBLK8.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetySBLK logoSBLKBeta 0.73 vs SPIR's 2.93
DividendsOP logoOP66.2% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ASTS logoASTS+158.1% vs OP's -97.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SBLK logoSBLK2.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 3.2% vs -0.1%

OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OPOceanPal Inc.
FY 2024
Tanker Segment
100.0%$934,000
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ASTSAST SpaceMobile, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
62.6%$44M
Service
37.4%$27M
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSBLKLAGGINGSPIR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SBLK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 53.6x OP's $19M. SBLK is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$72M$71M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M-$74M-$237M$311M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$25.0B-$342M$84M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M-$16.2B-$1.1B$209M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.6%+40.8%+53.4%+33.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-97.3%-121.4%-4.1%+13.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-96.7%-349.6%-4.8%+8.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-104.0%-227.0%-16.0%+20.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-54.3%-26.9%+27.3%-2.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.1%+59.5%-55.6%+58.3%
SBLK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 73% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
Market CapShares × price$2M$529.9B$19.1B$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$5M$513.8B$16.8B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.13x10.01x-48.76x36.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x7405.21x269.64x2.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x4.56x5.68x1.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.73x
OP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SBLK delivers a 3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBLK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs OP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.2%-88.4%-21.1%+3.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.3%-47.3%-12.6%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-17.5%-0.1%-47.1%+3.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.4%-0.1%-10.0%+4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92555
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.01x0.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M-$16.1B-$2.3B$572M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$24.8B$2.3B$500M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$8.8B$32M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-141.83x9.20x-21.20x2.08x
SBLK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for OP. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs OP's -97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs OP's -85.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-64.4%+106.4%-21.7%+40.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.7%+73.1%+158.1%+83.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+198.1%+1194.0%+60.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-79.6%+688.2%+79.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-78.8%+568.8%+977.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-85.2%+43.9%+134.8%+17.1%
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs OP's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x2.93x2.82x0.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1585.00$23.59$129.89$27.20
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.12$6.60$22.47$14.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.5%+68.3%+50.3%+98.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.155.541.872.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded308K1.6M14.9M1.4M
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). For income investors, OP offers the higher dividend yield at 66.25% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricOP logoOPOceanPal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.25$103.65$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts12724
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+66.2%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.48$0.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.2%
OP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SBLK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallStar Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OP vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SBLK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK?

On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK?

Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 5% for OceanPal Inc. (OP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus OP's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 300% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 44% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OP leads at 168. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBLK leads at 13. 5% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58.

6% to $103. 65.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK?

In this comparison, OP (66.

2% yield), SBLK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OP or SPIR or ASTS or SBLK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OP and SPIR and ASTS and SBLK?

These companies operate in different sectors (OP (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and SBLK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OP is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OP, SBLK pay a dividend while SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 26.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASTS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1365%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OP and SPIR and ASTS and SBLK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OP: -54.3% · SPIR: -26.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.