Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $4.99B | $10.47B | $4.08B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.37B | $2.48B | $8.31B | $5.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.30B | $-32M | $14M | $-128M |
| Gross Margin | 8.0% | 74.9% | 10.8% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | -3.7% | -4.2% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.7x | 44.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $193M | $93M | $454M | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $962M | $768M | $199M | $118M |
OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +6.1% vs Z's -36.1%
Z is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.32
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 3.13x
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 3.13x
COMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
- 0.2% margin vs OPEN's -29.7%
- 0.4% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC -2.5% vs -16.6%
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -36.7% 10Y total return vs Z's 62.9%
- 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs OPEN's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs Z's -36.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC -2.5% vs -16.6% |
OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOUS leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 0 • Z leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — Z and COMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 3.3x Z's $2.5B. COMP is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -29.7%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $2.5B | $8.3B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$287M | $187M | -$100M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | -$32M | $14M | -$128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $264M | $16M | -$41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +74.9% | +10.8% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -3.7% | -4.2% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.7% | -1.3% | +0.2% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +10.6% | +0.2% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.1% | +16.4% | +99.4% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | +145.3% | +133.3% | -2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HOUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOUS's 18.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 52.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $10.5B | $4.1B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $9.8B | $4.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.08x | 483.78x | -72.60x | -15.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.65x | 44.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 51.99x | 18.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 4.05x | 0.59x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.99x | 2.27x | 5.27x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.81x | 44.55x | 20.07x | 76.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — Z and HOUS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COMP delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-129 for OPEN. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs HOUS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -129.4% | -0.6% | +1.1% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.0% | -0.6% | +0.4% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.6% | -0.6% | -2.5% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.3% | -0.7% | -2.9% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.02x | 0.58x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$769M | -$675M | $255M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $962M | $768M | $199M | $118M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $193M | $93M | $454M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.38x | -0.12x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOUS five years ago would be worth $10,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,764 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +607.7% total return vs Z's -36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOUS at 50.7% vs Z's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -34.0% | -30.9% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +607.7% | -36.1% | -8.2% | +365.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.2% | -10.6% | +191.6% | +242.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | -61.7% | -57.5% | +1.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.6% | +62.9% | -64.0% | -36.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.0% | -3.7% | +42.9% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — Z and HOUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Z is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs Z's 46.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.09x | 1.32x | 1.79x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.87 | $93.88 | $13.96 | $18.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $39.05 | $5.66 | $3.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.1% | +46.4% | +52.0% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 49.0 | 38.4 | 77.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36.4M | 3.6M | 14.1M | 11.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPEN as "Hold", Z as "Hold", COMP as "Buy", HOUS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 96.8% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). HOUS is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $80.00 | $14.29 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 46 | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +23.7% | +6.4% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HOUS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
OPEN vs Z vs COMP vs HOUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 483. 8x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS?
On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS?
Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
(HOUS) delivered a total return of +1. 1%, compared to -72. 4% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +62. 9% versus COMP's -64. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 135% more volatile than Z relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, Z leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -6. 6% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — Z leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 4x for Compass, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 96. 8% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS?
In this comparison, HOUS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. OPEN, Z, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPEN or Z or COMP or HOUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (Z: +62. 9%, OPEN: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPEN and Z and COMP and HOUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OPEN (Real Estate) and Z (Communication Services) and COMP (Technology) and HOUS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.