Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OPHC vs CHMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
OPHC vs CHMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $66M | $331M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $140M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 57.7% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | 4.2x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $103M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $23M |
OPHC vs CHMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OptimumBank Holding… (OPHC) | 100 | 297.3 | +197.3% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPHC vs CHMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.49
- Rev growth 63.8%, EPS growth 52.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 99.6%, current ratio 0.15x
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 198.0% 10Y total return vs OPHC's 35.3%
- 1.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +54.5% vs OPHC's +23.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 63.8% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs CHMG's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs OPHC's +23.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
OPHC vs CHMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPHC vs CHMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPHC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 2.2x OPHC's $64M. OPHC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $140M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.7% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OPHC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, OPHC trades at a 81% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPHC's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMG's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66M | $331M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $75M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.18x | 22.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.13x | 15.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.52x | 163.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPHC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OPHC delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPHC's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPHC scores 6/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $103M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.93x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHMG five years ago would be worth $17,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,343 for OPHC. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +54.5% total return vs OPHC's +23.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHMG at 27.7% vs OPHC's 20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | +27.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.3% | +54.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | +108.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.4% | +70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.3% | +198.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
OPHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OPHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.64 | $70.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.91 | $43.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
OPHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CHMG is the only dividend payer here at 1.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OPHC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns).
OPHC vs CHMG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPHC or CHMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(OPHC) is the stronger pick with 63. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (OPHC) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPHC or CHMG?
On trailing P/E, OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(OPHC) is the cheapest at 4. 2x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPHC or CHMG?
Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +70.
4%, compared to +53. 4% for OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (OPHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +198. 0% versus OPHC's +35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPHC or CHMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(OPHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Chemung Financial Corporation's 0. 73β — meaning CHMG is approximately 50% more volatile than OPHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 100% for OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPHC or CHMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(OPHC) is pulling ahead at 63. 8% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 52. 9% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPHC or CHMG?
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
(OPHC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPHC leads at 27. 4% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHMG leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — OPHC or CHMG?
In this comparison, CHMG (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. OPHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OPHC or CHMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 1. 9% yield, +198. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +198. 0%, OPHC: +35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OPHC and CHMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CHMG pays a dividend while OPHC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.