Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OPRA vs NFLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OPRA
Opera Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • NO
Market Cap$1.68B
5Y Perf.+203.6%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%

OPRA vs NFLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OPRA logoOPRA
NFLX logoNFLX
IndustryInternet Content & InformationEntertainment
Market Cap$1.68B$374.00B
Revenue (TTM)$648M$45.18B
Net Income (TTM)$115M$10.98B
Gross Margin58.5%48.5%
Operating Margin15.5%29.5%
Forward P/E16.1x24.8x
Total Debt$13M$14.46B
Cash & Equiv.$155M$9.03B

OPRA vs NFLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OPRA
NFLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Opera Limited (OPRA)100303.6+203.6%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OPRA vs NFLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OPRA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Netflix, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OPRA
Opera Limited
The Growth Play

OPRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 28.3%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.35x
  • 28.3% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Income Pick

NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.39
  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs OPRA's 70.1%
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOPRA logoOPRA28.3% revenue growth vs NFLX's 15.9%
ValueOPRA logoOPRALower P/E (16.1x vs 24.8x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs OPRA's 17.7%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs OPRA's 1.57
DividendsOPRA logoOPRA4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OPRA logoOPRA+15.1% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs OPRA's 10.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs 8.2%

OPRA vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OPRAOpera Limited
FY 2025
Advertising [member]
100.0%$396M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B

OPRA vs NFLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOPRALAGGINGNFLX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 69.8x OPRA's $648M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPRA's 17.7%. On growth, OPRA holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$648M$45.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$120M$30.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$115M$11.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$129M$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.5%+48.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.5%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+24.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.9%+20.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.2%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.0%+31.1%
Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.8x trailing earnings, OPRA trades at a 55% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OPRA's 13.8x.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$374.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$379.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.76x34.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.06x24.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.78x12.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.72x8.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.69x14.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.58x39.53x
OPRA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $12 for OPRA. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs OPRA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.8%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.4%+19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.2%+29.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.4%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$143M$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$155M$9.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense222.21x17.33x
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth $21,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,519 for NFLX. Over the past 12 months, OPRA leads with a +15.1% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs OPRA's 19.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.5%-3.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.1%-23.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+71.3%+166.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.8%+75.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.1%+875.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.7%+38.6%
Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRA's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPRA currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.57x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.06$134.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.71$75.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.1%+65.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.635.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded623K44.0M
Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates OPRA as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 14.6% for OPRA (target: $22). OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOPRA logoOPRAOpera LimitedNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.50$116.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts799
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

OPRA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NFLX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallOpera Limited (OPRA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OPRA vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OPRA or NFLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger pick with 28.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Opera Limited (OPRA) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OPRA or NFLX?

On trailing P/E, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the cheapest at 15.

8x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Opera Limited is actually cheaper at 16. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OPRA or NFLX?

Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +110.

8%, compared to +75. 2% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus OPRA's +70. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OPRA or NFLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Opera Limited's 1. 57β — meaning OPRA is approximately 302% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OPRA or NFLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opera Limited (OPRA) is pulling ahead at 28.

3% versus 15. 9% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Opera Limited grew EPS 32. 2% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRA leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OPRA or NFLX?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 17. 6% for Opera Limited — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 15. 0% for OPRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OPRA or NFLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Opera Limited (OPRA) trades at 16.

1x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OPRA or NFLX?

In this comparison, OPRA (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OPRA or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, OPRA: +70. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OPRA and NFLX?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

OPRA pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

OPRA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OPRA and NFLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OPRA: 23.2% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(OPRA: 17.7% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(OPRA: 15.8x · NFLX: 34.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.