Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $374.00B | $10.11B | $14.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $648M | $45.18B | $6.10B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115M | $10.98B | $-410M | $334M |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 48.5% | 55.8% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 29.5% | -6.8% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 24.8x | — | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $14.46B | $4.70B | $262M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $155M | $9.03B | $1.03B | $969M |
OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 100 | 303.6 | +203.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 106.3 | +6.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.3%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
- 28.3% revenue growth vs SNAP's 10.6%
- 4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +15.1% vs SNAP's -26.4%
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs OPRA's 70.1%
- 24.3% margin vs SNAP's -6.7%
- Beta 0.39 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage
SNAP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PINS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 7.64x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.3% revenue growth vs SNAP's 10.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs SNAP's -6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs SNAP's -5.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs -6.9% |
OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 1 of 6 categories
OPRA leads 0 • SNAP leads 0 • PINS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NFLX and PINS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 69.8x OPRA's $648M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAP's -6.7%. On growth, OPRA holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $648M | $45.2B | $6.1B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | $30.1B | -$291M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115M | $11.0B | -$410M | $334M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $129M | $9.5B | $609M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +48.5% | +55.8% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +29.5% | -6.8% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +24.3% | -6.7% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +20.9% | +10.0% | +27.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.2% | +17.6% | +12.1% | +17.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.0% | +31.1% | +39.2% | -10.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNAP and PINS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, OPRA trades at a 55% valuation discount to PINS's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINS's 39.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $374.0B | $10.1B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $379.4B | $13.8B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.76x | 34.89x | -22.17x | 35.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.06x | 24.80x | — | 11.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.78x | 12.61x | — | 39.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.72x | 8.28x | 1.70x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | 14.32x | 4.51x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.58x | 39.53x | 23.12x | 11.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-19 for SNAP. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAP's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs SNAP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +41.3% | -18.9% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.4% | +19.8% | -5.4% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +29.8% | -6.9% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +30.5% | -8.1% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.54x | 2.06x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$143M | $5.4B | $3.7B | -$707M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $9.0B | $1.0B | $969M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $14.5B | $4.7B | $262M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 222.21x | 17.33x | -7.67x | 23.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth $21,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,094 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, OPRA leads with a +15.1% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs SNAP's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.5% | -3.0% | -26.4% | -18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.1% | -23.6% | -26.4% | -21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.3% | +166.5% | -28.9% | -0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.8% | +75.2% | -89.1% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.1% | +875.3% | -75.6% | -11.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.7% | +38.6% | -10.8% | -0.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OPRA and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPRA currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 54.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 0.39x | 2.14x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.06 | $134.12 | $10.41 | $39.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.71 | $75.01 | $3.81 | $13.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +65.8% | +57.5% | +54.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 35.3 | 61.6 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 623K | 44.0M | 49.1M | 16.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRA as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", SNAP as "Hold", PINS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for SNAP (target: $8) vs 14.6% for OPRA (target: $22). OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | $116.29 | $7.89 | $25.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 99 | 72 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +27.2% | +6.5% |
NFLX leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
OPRA vs NFLX vs SNAP vs PINS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger pick with 28.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 6% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). Opera Limited (OPRA) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS?
On trailing P/E, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the cheapest at 15.
8x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Pinterest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS?
Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +110.
8%, compared to -89. 1% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus SNAP's -75. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning SNAP is approximately 450% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Snap Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opera Limited (OPRA) is pulling ahead at 28.
3% versus 10. 6% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Snap Inc. grew EPS 35. 7% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRA leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -7. 8% for Snap Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -9. 0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINS leads at 80. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNAP: 31. 8% to $7. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS?
In this comparison, OPRA (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX, SNAP, PINS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OPRA or NFLX or SNAP or PINS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, SNAP: -75. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPRA and NFLX and SNAP and PINS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. OPRA pays a dividend while NFLX, SNAP, PINS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.