Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3.10B | $2.58B | $73.68B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $14.92B | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-2M | $4.42B | $-107M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 84.5% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | 24.3% | -80.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 77.6x | 15.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $968K | $6M | $2.71B | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $43M | $3.12B | $197M |
ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oruka Therapeutics,… (ORKA) | 100 | 153.0 | +53.0% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 141.1 | +41.1% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORKA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 8.4% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
- +5.7% vs REGN's +27.1%
ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 90.0% 10Y total return vs ORKA's -89.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8%
- 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
DAWN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.35
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.35, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.35 vs ORKA's 1.61
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs ORKA's 1.61 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs REGN's +27.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs ORKA's -26.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs -41.2% |
ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ORKA leads 1 • DAWN leads 1 • ARQT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and ORKA operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAWN's -67.8%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $14.9B | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$126M | $6M | $4.2B | -$124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$2M | $4.4B | -$107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$85M | $27M | $4.2B | -$108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +84.5% | +89.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | +24.3% | -80.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | +29.6% | -67.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | +27.9% | -68.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +19.0% | +83.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.9% | +55.0% | -7.2% | +70.0% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $2.6B | $73.7B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $2.5B | $73.3B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.84x | -158.92x | 17.09x | -20.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 77.64x | 15.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.78x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.87x | 5.14x | 14.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.81x | 13.87x | 2.46x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-28 for ORKA. ORKA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REGN's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs ORKA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | -1.4% | +14.3% | -23.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.6% | -0.6% | +11.1% | -20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.2% | -5.2% | +8.9% | -30.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.5% | -4.3% | +10.2% | -26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.09x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$61M | -$37M | -$412M | -$194M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $43M | $3.1B | $197M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $968,000 | $6M | $2.7B | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.03x | 2.08x | 108.44x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORKA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORKA five years ago would be worth $21,524 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,053 for ARQT. Over the past 12 months, ORKA leads with a +571.6% total return vs REGN's +27.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORKA at 50.0% vs REGN's -1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +126.6% | -28.8% | -8.5% | +143.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +571.6% | +50.8% | +27.1% | +241.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +237.5% | +44.9% | -5.1% | +65.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.2% | -39.5% | +43.6% | -8.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | -5.2% | +90.0% | -8.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.0% | +13.2% | -1.7% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORKA's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 1.48x | 0.81x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.00 | $31.77 | $821.11 | $21.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $12.42 | $476.49 | $5.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.4% | +65.0% | +86.4% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 54.3 | 44.9 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.3M | 631K | 4.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORKA as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 112.9% upside for ORKA (target: $136) vs 10.3% for DAWN (target: $24). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $136.38 | $35.50 | $865.68 | $23.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 12 | 48 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | 0.0% |
REGN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ORKA leads in 1 (Total Returns).
ORKA vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. (ORKA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN?
On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN?
Over the past 5 years, Oruka Therapeutics, Inc.
(ORKA) delivered a total return of +115. 2%, compared to -39. 5% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REGN returned +90. 0% versus ORKA's -89. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning ORKA is approximately 355% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. (ORKA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -2. 0% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -67. 8% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -80. 8% for DAWN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 77. 6x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 62. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORKA: 112. 9% to $136. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ORKA, ARQT, DAWN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORKA or ARQT or REGN or DAWN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35)). Oruka Therapeutics, Inc. (ORKA) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAWN: -8. 4%, ORKA: -89. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORKA and ARQT and REGN and DAWN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ORKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.