Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ORKT
Orangekloud Technology Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-94.7%
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$477M
5Y Perf.+67.6%
KPLT
Katapult Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.-66.7%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-52.0%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.+7.9%

ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ORKT logoORKT
APPS logoAPPS
KPLT logoKPLT
BTBT logoBTBT
CLPS logoCLPS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Capital MarketsInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$5M$477M$31M$589M$25M
Revenue (TTM)$10M$532M$299M$164M$299M
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$-42M$13M$137M$-4M
Gross Margin38.7%60.1%-26.9%61.9%22.8%
Operating Margin-99.1%0.1%11.3%16.8%-1.4%
Forward P/E10.1x9.2x
Total Debt$504K$418M$79M$14M$34M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$40M$22M$95M$28M

ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ORKT
APPS
KPLT
BTBT
CLPS
StockJul 24May 26Return
Orangekloud Technol… (ORKT)1005.3-94.7%
Digital Turbine, In… (APPS)100167.6+67.6%
Katapult Holdings, … (KPLT)10033.3-66.7%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10048.0-52.0%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)100107.9+7.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Digital Turbine, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. KPLT and CLPS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ORKT
Orangekloud Technology Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ORKT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 3.7%, current ratio 5.98x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

APPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 353.4% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
  • +10.5% vs ORKT's -36.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
KPLT
Katapult Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

KPLT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 98.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
  • Beta 0.04 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: growth exposure
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ORKT's -33.6%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 17.3% margin vs ORKT's -98.3%
  • 19.0% ROA vs ORKT's -62.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -167.1%
Best for: growth and value
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
  • 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ORKT's -33.6%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs ORKT's -98.3%
Stability / SafetyKPLT logoKPLTBeta 0.04 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)APPS logoAPPS+10.5% vs ORKT's -36.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs ORKT's -62.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -167.1%

ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ORKTOrangekloud Technology Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

APPSDigital Turbine, Inc.
FY 2022
On Device Media
100.0%$503M
KPLTKatapult Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598

ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGAPPS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

APPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $532M annually — 52.5x ORKT's $10M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ORKT's -98.3%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$532M$299M$164M$299M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M$70M$159M$166M-$1M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M-$42M$13M$137M-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M$19M-$4M-$448M$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.7%+60.1%-26.9%+61.9%+22.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-99.1%+0.1%+11.3%+16.8%-1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-98.3%-7.9%+4.3%+17.3%-1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.1%+3.5%-1.2%-65.3%-2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-39.1%+12.4%+9.8%+15.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.0%+113.6%+105.7%+2.8%+75.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, KPLT's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPS's 29.7x.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Market CapShares × price$5M$477M$31M$589M$25M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$694,871$855M$87M$508M$31M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.78x-4.48x-63.00x9.15x-3.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.66x0.45x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x0.97x0.10x3.60x0.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.50x2.69x0.56x0.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-73 for ORKT. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPS's 2.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-73.4%-21.5%+21.4%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-62.1%-4.9%+13.1%+19.0%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-167.1%-7.4%+39.6%+6.5%-7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-105.9%-8.9%+8.5%-9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934562
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x2.72x0.03x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M$378M$57M-$81M$6M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$40M$22M$95M$28M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$503,579$418M$79M$14M$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-533.17x-1.83x1.85x
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $230 for KPLT. Over the past 12 months, APPS leads with a +10.5% total return vs ORKT's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs ORKT's -63.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+48.4%-16.5%+7.1%-10.3%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.7%+10.5%-1.0%-9.0%-5.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%-66.5%-56.0%-19.7%+0.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%-93.9%-97.7%-84.6%-69.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.3%+353.4%-97.2%-60.4%-78.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.9%-30.6%-23.9%-7.1%+0.2%
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KPLT and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KPLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs KPLT's 28.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.56x1.72x0.04x3.37x0.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.55$8.28$24.34$4.55$1.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.62$2.74$5.50$1.25$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.1%+48.2%+28.5%+40.2%+48.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.662.948.169.149.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded114K2.1M20K18.5M15K
Evenly matched — KPLT and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: APPS as "Hold", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 150.6% for APPS (target: $10). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs BTBT's 0.31%.

MetricORKT logoORKTOrangekloud Techn…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …KPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts112
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises103
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.9%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ORKT vs APPS vs KPLT vs BTBT vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 6% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS?

Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -69.

3%, compared to -97. 7% for Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPS returned +353. 4% versus KPLT's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Katapult Holdings, Inc.

(KPLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 9084% more volatile than KPLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -33. 6% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. (ORKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -565. 4% for Orangekloud Technology Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KPLT leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -213. 9% for Orangekloud Technology Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -214. 9% for ORKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ORKT, APPS, KPLT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ORKT or APPS or KPLT or BTBT or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ORKT and APPS and KPLT and BTBT and CLPS?

These companies operate in different sectors (ORKT (Technology) and APPS (Technology) and KPLT (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ORKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KPLT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ORKT, APPS, KPLT, BTBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ORKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KPLT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ORKT and APPS and KPLT and BTBT and CLPS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ORKT: -39.1% · APPS: 12.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.