ORRF vs FXNC

For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 6% for Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (ORRF). Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (ORRF) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.

(ORRF) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus First National Corporation at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 69x versus First National Corporation's 7. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.

(ORRF) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to +66. 3% for First National Corporation (FXNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +239. 8% versus ORRF's +139. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First National Corporation (FXNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

70β versus Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 85β — meaning ORRF is approximately 22% more volatile than FXNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 57% for Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.

1% versus 24. 6% for Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (ORRF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 193. 9% year-over-year, compared to 96. 0% for First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.

(ORRF) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 8% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORRF leads at 29. 0% versus 19. 6% for FXNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (ORRF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus First National Corporation's 7. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (ORRF) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for First National Corporation — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (ORRF) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 2. 2% for First National Corporation (FXNC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

70), 2. 2% yield, +239. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +239. 8%, ORRF: +139. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.