Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $898M | $699M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $397M | $372M | $315M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $89M | $69M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 64.0% | 69.6% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 27.5% | 25.8% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 9.5x | 9.6x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $826M | $117M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $473M | $52M | $119M |
OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Second Bancorp,… (OSBC) | 100 | 273.8 | +173.8% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.7 | +126.7% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 219.4% 10Y total return vs MBWM's 178.2%
- NIM 4.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 18.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
MBWM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
- PEG 0.63 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 1.82
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs OSBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs OSBC's 1.1%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs OSBC's 0.90, lower leverage
- +45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 1.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs OSBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs OSBC's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs OSBC's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs OSBC's 0.5% |
OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
OSBC leads 1 • MBWM leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $397M annually — 4.4x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $397M | $372M | $315M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $107M | $89M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | $89M | $69M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $11M | $70M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +64.0% | +69.6% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +27.5% | +25.8% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +23.9% | +21.7% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +3.0% | +22.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +14.8% | +2.3% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MBWM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 34% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $898M | $699M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $1.3B | $764M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.01x | 9.53x | 10.38x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.71x | 9.54x | 9.56x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 0.63x | 1.97x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.97x | 11.75x | 9.39x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.80x | 2.42x | 2.22x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.17x | 1.41x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.43x | 80.15x | 9.96x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs OSBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +13.5% | +14.2% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +5.5% | +10.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +8.0% | +2.6% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 1.14x | 0.23x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $215M | $353M | $65M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $473M | $52M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $826M | $117M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.78x | 0.79x | 0.91x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $17,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,775 for OSBC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs OSBC's 24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.9% | +10.1% | +7.2% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.5% | +23.6% | +12.6% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.4% | +127.3% | +130.6% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.8% | +78.4% | +63.7% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.4% | +178.2% | +184.6% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | +31.5% | +32.1% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSBC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSBC's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSBC currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.87x | 0.83x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.43 | $55.77 | $37.39 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.21 | $42.17 | $29.63 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +93.3% | +90.8% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 53.1 | 50.6 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 400K | 112K | 176K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSBC as "Buy", MBWM as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.3% upside for OSBC (target: $24) vs 9.6% for MBWM (target: $57). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.05% vs OSBC's 1.09%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.67 | $57.00 | $38.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 7 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 6 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | $1.47 | $1.03 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). OSBC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
(OSBC) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +78.
4%, compared to +57. 8% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSBC returned +219. 4% versus CZWI's +157. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning OSBC is approximately 96% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
(OSBC) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -13. 4% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSBC leads at 27. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSBC leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OSBC: 12. 3% to $23. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC).
09Is OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MBWM: +178. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSBC and MBWM and IBCP and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.