Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OSBC
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.+173.8%
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.+126.7%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.+145.7%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+186.8%

OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OSBC logoOSBC
MBWM logoMBWM
IBCP logoIBCP
CZWI logoCZWI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.11B$898M$699M$203M
Revenue (TTM)$397M$372M$315M$90M
Net Income (TTM)$80M$89M$69M$14M
Gross Margin78.1%64.0%69.6%54.7%
Operating Margin27.9%27.5%25.8%7.0%
Forward P/E9.7x9.5x9.6x11.8x
Total Debt$339M$826M$117M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$124M$473M$52M$119M

OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OSBC
MBWM
IBCP
CZWI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Old Second Bancorp,… (OSBC)100273.8+173.8%
Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM)100226.7+126.7%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100245.7+145.7%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100286.8+186.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MBWM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. OSBC and IBCP also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OSBC
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

OSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 219.4% 10Y total return vs MBWM's 178.2%
  • NIM 4.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • 18.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

MBWM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
  • PEG 0.63 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Lower P/E (9.5x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 1.82
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs OSBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
  • 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs OSBC's 1.1%
Best for: income & stability
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.46 vs OSBC's 0.90, lower leverage
  • +45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOSBC logoOSBC18.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueMBWM logoMBWMLower P/E (9.5x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 1.82
Quality / MarginsMBWM logoMBWMEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs OSBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.46 vs OSBC's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsIBCP logoIBCP3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs OSBC's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+45.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MBWM logoMBWMEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs OSBC's 0.5%

OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OSBCOld Second Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MBWMMercantile Bank Corporation
FY 2025
Credit and Debit Card
42.4%$9M
Service Charges on Deposit and Sweep Accounts
37.5%$8M
Payroll Processing
16.0%$3M
Customer Service
4.0%$876,000
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M

OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGCZWI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

OSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $397M annually — 4.4x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricOSBC logoOSBCOld Second Bancor…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$397M$372M$315M$90M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$121M$107M$89M$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$80M$89M$69M$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$119M$11M$70M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.1%+64.0%+69.6%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.9%+27.5%+25.8%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.2%+23.9%+21.7%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+29.7%+3.0%+22.2%+11.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.6%+14.8%+2.3%+63.0%
OSBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MBWM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 34% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOSBC logoOSBCOld Second Bancor…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$898M$699M$203M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$1.3B$764M$136M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.01x9.53x10.38x14.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.71x9.54x9.56x11.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.09x0.63x1.97x2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.97x11.75x9.39x15.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.80x2.42x2.22x2.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.26x1.17x1.41x1.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.43x80.15x9.96x19.55x
MBWM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs OSBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOSBC logoOSBCOld Second Bancor…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.1%+13.5%+14.2%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+1.4%+1.3%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.1%+5.5%+10.2%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.9%+8.0%+2.6%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93486
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.38x1.14x0.23x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$215M$353M$65M-$67M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$124M$473M$52M$119M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$339M$826M$117M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.78x0.79x0.91x0.16x
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $17,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,775 for OSBC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs OSBC's 24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOSBC logoOSBCOld Second Bancor…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.9%+10.1%+7.2%+21.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.5%+23.6%+12.6%+45.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+91.4%+127.3%+130.6%+160.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+57.8%+78.4%+63.7%+71.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+219.4%+178.2%+184.6%+157.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.2%+31.5%+32.1%+37.5%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — OSBC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSBC's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSBC currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOSBC logoOSBCOld Second Bancor…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.87x0.83x0.46x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.43$55.77$37.39$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.21$42.17$29.63$12.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.0%+93.3%+90.8%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.653.150.663.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded400K112K176K40K
Evenly matched — OSBC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: OSBC as "Buy", MBWM as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.3% upside for OSBC (target: $24) vs 9.6% for MBWM (target: $57). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.05% vs OSBC's 1.09%.

MetricOSBC logoOSBCOld Second Bancor…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.67$57.00$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts6772
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+2.8%+3.0%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises76117
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.23$1.47$1.03$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%0.0%+1.8%+3.1%
IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). OSBC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OSBC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

(OSBC) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?

On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?

Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +78.

4%, compared to +57. 8% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSBC returned +219. 4% versus CZWI's +157. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning OSBC is approximately 96% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

(OSBC) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -13. 4% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?

Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

9% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSBC leads at 27. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSBC leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OSBC: 12. 3% to $23. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC).

09

Is OSBC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MBWM: +178. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OSBC and MBWM and IBCP and CZWI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OSBC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MBWM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZWI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OSBC and MBWM and IBCP and CZWI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OSBC: 18.1% · MBWM: 2.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(OSBC: 20.2% · MBWM: 23.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(OSBC: 13.0x · MBWM: 9.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.