Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Insurance - Diversified
Biotechnology
OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Insurance - Diversified | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.71B | $1.35B | $3.74B | $33.54B | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.70B | $1.92B | $4.26B | $19.93B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-443M | $-86M | $20M | $4.40B | $-739M |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 103.6% | 9.0% | 37.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | -4.4% | 0.8% | 25.0% | — |
| Forward P/E | 29.8x | 61.0x | 141.3x | 10.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $430M | $0.00 | $338M | $2.73B | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $78M | $578M | $993M | $230M |
OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 359.5 | +259.5% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 153.5 | +53.5% |
| Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 206.7 | +106.7% |
| Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN) | 100 | 154.1 | +54.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +38.0% vs BHVN's -57.1%
CLOV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ALHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 46.1%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 1.74x
- 46.1% revenue growth vs BHVN's 12.8%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 0.0%
- 320.6% 10Y total return vs BHVN's 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, BHVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.1% revenue growth vs BHVN's 12.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs CLOV's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs OSCR's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs BHVN's -57.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs BHVN's -158.0%, ROIC 15.4% vs -242.1% |
OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
OSCR leads 0 • CLOV leads 0 • ALHC leads 0 • BHVN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL and BHVN operate at a comparable scale, with $19.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLOV's -4.4%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +44.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.7B | $1.9B | $4.3B | $19.9B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$379M | -$84M | $66M | $5.2B | -$737M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$443M | -$86M | $20M | $4.4B | -$739M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$69M | $237M | $6.1B | -$610M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.6% | +103.6% | +9.0% | +37.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -4.4% | +0.8% | +25.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -4.4% | +0.5% | +22.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | -3.6% | +5.6% | +30.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +44.7% | +33.3% | +7.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -112.5% | +2.1% | +39.0% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACGL's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 77.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $1.3B | $3.7B | $33.5B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $1.3B | $3.5B | $35.3B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.62x | -15.35x | -4945.95x | 8.10x | -1.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.79x | 60.98x | 141.31x | 10.01x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 77.35x | 6.82x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 0.70x | 0.95x | 1.68x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.80x | 4.37x | 20.21x | 1.46x | 20.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | — | 33.04x | 5.47x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for BHVN. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHVN's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs BHVN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.2% | -27.7% | +11.5% | +19.0% | -6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | -15.8% | +1.8% | +5.9% | -158.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -34.0% | — | +15.4% | -2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.3% | -24.5% | +2.9% | +11.6% | -187.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | 1.89x | 0.11x | 5.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | -$78M | -$240M | $1.7B | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $78M | $578M | $993M | $230M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $0 | $338M | $2.7B | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.85x | — | 1.27x | 34.86x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OSCR and CLOV and ACGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,953 for CLOV. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +38.0% total return vs BHVN's -57.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.7% vs BHVN's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | +8.3% | -9.5% | +0.3% | -10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | -22.1% | +18.2% | +1.7% | -57.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.2% | +222.2% | +165.6% | +32.5% | -31.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.0% | -70.5% | -31.9% | +146.7% | +33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.4% | -74.4% | +5.7% | +320.6% | +33.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.8% | +47.7% | +38.5% | +9.8% | -12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs BHVN's 41.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.22x | 0.75x | 0.02x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.80 | $3.92 | $23.87 | $103.39 | $23.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.69 | $1.58 | $11.63 | $82.45 | $7.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +66.6% | +76.7% | +91.1% | +41.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.7 | 70.0 | 42.6 | 42.3 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 5.6M | 3.6M | 1.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSCR as "Hold", CLOV as "Hold", ALHC as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy", BHVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 119.3% upside for BHVN (target: $21) vs -6.6% for OSCR (target: $17).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $3.33 | $24.83 | $104.00 | $21.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 9 | 16 | 34 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +0.1% |
ACGL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
(ALHC) is the stronger pick with 46. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 3% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (ALHC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?
On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +146. 7%, compared to -70. 5% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +320. 6% versus CLOV's -74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 11909% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 5% for Biohaven Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
(ALHC) is pulling ahead at 46. 1% versus 14. 3% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLOV leads at 103. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 141. 3x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 131. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BHVN: 119. 3% to $21. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), +320. 6% 10Y return). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +320. 6%, OSCR: -48. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSCR and CLOV and ALHC and ACGL and BHVN?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSCR (Healthcare) and CLOV (Healthcare) and ALHC (Healthcare) and ACGL (Financial Services) and BHVN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BHVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.