Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.71B
5Y Perf.+259.5%
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.35B
5Y Perf.+53.5%
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Plans

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.74B
5Y Perf.+54.6%
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.

Insurance - Diversified

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • BM
Market Cap$33.54B
5Y Perf.+106.7%
BHVN
Biohaven Ltd.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.+54.1%

OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OSCR logoOSCR
CLOV logoCLOV
ALHC logoALHC
ACGL logoACGL
BHVN logoBHVN
IndustryMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansMedical - Healthcare PlansInsurance - DiversifiedBiotechnology
Market Cap$4.71B$1.35B$3.74B$33.54B$1.29B
Revenue (TTM)$11.70B$1.92B$4.26B$19.93B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-443M$-86M$20M$4.40B$-739M
Gross Margin77.6%103.6%9.0%37.2%
Operating Margin-3.5%-4.4%0.8%25.0%
Forward P/E29.8x61.0x141.3x10.0x
Total Debt$430M$0.00$338M$2.73B$279M
Cash & Equiv.$2.77B$78M$578M$993M$230M

OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OSCR
CLOV
ALHC
ACGL
BHVN
StockSep 22May 26Return
Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR)100359.5+259.5%
Clover Health Inves… (CLOV)100153.5+53.5%
Alignment Healthcar… (ALHC)100154.6+54.6%
Arch Capital Group … (ACGL)100206.7+106.7%
Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN)100154.1+54.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACGL leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Oscar Health, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ALHC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OSCR
Oscar Health, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

OSCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +38.0% vs BHVN's -57.1%
Best for: momentum
CLOV
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
The Insurance Play

CLOV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ALHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 46.1%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
  • Beta 0.75, current ratio 1.74x
  • 46.1% revenue growth vs BHVN's 12.8%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 0.0%
  • 320.6% 10Y total return vs BHVN's 33.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BHVN
Biohaven Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BHVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALHC logoALHC46.1% revenue growth vs BHVN's 12.8%
ValueACGL logoACGLBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsACGL logoACGL22.1% margin vs CLOV's -4.4%
Stability / SafetyACGL logoACGLBeta 0.02 vs OSCR's 1.84, lower leverage
DividendsACGL logoACGL0.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OSCR logoOSCR+38.0% vs BHVN's -57.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ACGL logoACGL5.9% ROA vs BHVN's -158.0%, ROIC 15.4% vs -242.1%

OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OSCROscar Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CLOVClover Health Investments, Corp.
FY 2024
Insurance
100.0%$26M
ALHCAlignment Healthcare, Inc.
FY 2023
Health Care, Premium
92.6%$1.7B
Health Care Capitation
7.4%$133M
ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd.
FY 2025
Reinsurance Segment
47.6%$8.1B
Insurance Segment
45.5%$7.8B
Mortgage Segment
6.9%$1.2B
BHVNBiohaven Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACGLLAGGINGBHVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACGL and BHVN operate at a comparable scale, with $19.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLOV's -4.4%. On growth, CLOV holds the edge at +44.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…BHVN logoBHVNBiohaven Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11.7B$1.9B$4.3B$19.9B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$379M-$84M$66M$5.2B-$737M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$443M-$86M$20M$4.4B-$739M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.1B-$69M$237M$6.1B-$610M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.6%+103.6%+9.0%+37.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.5%-4.4%+0.8%+25.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.8%-4.4%+0.5%+22.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.0%-3.6%+5.6%+30.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.2%+44.7%+33.3%+7.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-112.5%+2.1%+39.0%+34.6%
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ACGL's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALHC's 77.3x.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…BHVN logoBHVNBiohaven Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$4.7B$1.3B$3.7B$33.5B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.4B$1.3B$3.5B$35.3B$1.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-10.62x-15.35x-4945.95x8.10x-1.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.79x60.98x141.31x10.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.28x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple77.35x6.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.40x0.70x0.95x1.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.80x4.37x20.21x1.46x20.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.45x33.04x5.47x
ACGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for BHVN. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHVN's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs BHVN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…BHVN logoBHVNBiohaven Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-45.2%-27.7%+11.5%+19.0%-6.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%-15.8%+1.8%+5.9%-158.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-34.0%+15.4%-2.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.3%-24.5%+2.9%+11.6%-187.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943672
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x1.89x0.11x5.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.3B-$78M-$240M$1.7B$49M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.8B$78M$578M$993M$230M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$430M$0$338M$2.7B$279M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.85x1.27x34.86x
ACGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — OSCR and CLOV and ACGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,953 for CLOV. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +38.0% total return vs BHVN's -57.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.7% vs BHVN's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…BHVN logoBHVNBiohaven Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.8%+8.3%-9.5%+0.3%-10.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+38.0%-22.1%+18.2%+1.7%-57.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+150.2%+222.2%+165.6%+32.5%-31.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.0%-70.5%-31.9%+146.7%+33.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.4%-74.4%+5.7%+320.6%+33.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.8%+47.7%+38.5%+9.8%-12.0%
Evenly matched — OSCR and CLOV and ACGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs BHVN's 41.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…BHVN logoBHVNBiohaven Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.84x1.22x0.75x0.02x1.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.80$3.92$23.87$103.39$23.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.69$1.58$11.63$82.45$7.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.4%+66.6%+76.7%+91.1%+41.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10079.770.042.642.353.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.2M5.6M3.6M1.8M2.0M
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: OSCR as "Hold", CLOV as "Hold", ALHC as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy", BHVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 119.3% upside for BHVN (target: $21) vs -6.6% for OSCR (target: $17).

MetricOSCR logoOSCROscar Health, Inc.CLOV logoCLOVClover Health Inv…ALHC logoALHCAlignment Healthc…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…BHVN logoBHVNBiohaven Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.75$3.33$24.83$104.00$21.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts119163425
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%+5.6%+0.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACGL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallArch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OSCR vs CLOV vs ALHC vs ACGL vs BHVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is the stronger pick with 46. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 3% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alignment Healthcare, Inc. (ALHC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?

On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?

Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) delivered a total return of +146. 7%, compared to -70. 5% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. (CLOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +320. 6% versus CLOV's -74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 11909% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 5% for Biohaven Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alignment Healthcare, Inc.

(ALHC) is pulling ahead at 46. 1% versus 14. 3% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alignment Healthcare, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -4. 4% for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus -4. 4% for CLOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLOV leads at 103. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 141. 3x for Alignment Healthcare, Inc. — 131. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BHVN: 119. 3% to $21. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is OSCR or CLOV or ALHC or ACGL or BHVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), +320. 6% 10Y return). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +320. 6%, OSCR: -48. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OSCR and CLOV and ALHC and ACGL and BHVN?

These companies operate in different sectors (OSCR (Healthcare) and CLOV (Healthcare) and ALHC (Healthcare) and ACGL (Financial Services) and BHVN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BHVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OSCR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLOV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Gross Margin > 62%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALHC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACGL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BHVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OSCR and CLOV and ALHC and ACGL and BHVN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OSCR: 17.2% · CLOV: 44.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.