Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OSCR vs MIRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
OSCR vs MIRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $4.71B | $40M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.70B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-443M | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | 29.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $430M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $3M |
OSCR vs MIRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
| MIRA Pharmaceutical… (MIRA) | 100 | 16.3 | -83.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSCR vs MIRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -48.4% 10Y total return vs MIRA's -84.1%
- -3.8% margin vs MIRA's -5.7%
- +38.0% vs MIRA's -12.8%
MIRA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.72
- EPS growth 21.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, current ratio 3.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 103.2% revenue growth vs OSCR's 27.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.8% margin vs MIRA's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.72 vs OSCR's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs MIRA's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.0% ROA vs MIRA's -372.3% |
OSCR vs MIRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSCR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSCR and MIRA operate at a comparable scale, with $11.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.7B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$379M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$443M | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
OSCR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $40M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $37M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.62x | -2.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.80x | 7.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OSCR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSCR delivers a -45.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-45 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MIRA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSCR scores 4/9 vs MIRA's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.2% | -3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | -3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.3% | -2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.85x | -48.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSCR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSCR five years ago would be worth $7,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,589 for MIRA. Over the past 12 months, OSCR leads with a +38.0% total return vs MIRA's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSCR at 35.8% vs MIRA's -45.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | -31.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.2% | -84.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.0% | -84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.4% | -84.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.8% | -45.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSCR and MIRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MIRA is the less volatile stock with a 1.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSCR currently trades 75.4% from its 52-week high vs MIRA's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.80 | $2.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.69 | $0.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +41.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.7 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 158K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OSCR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
OSCR vs MIRA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSCR or MIRA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or MIRA?
Over the past 5 years, Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) delivered a total return of -24. 0%, compared to -84. 1% for MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MIRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSCR returned -48. 4% versus MIRA's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OSCR or MIRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 72β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 7% more volatile than MIRA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OSCR or MIRA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 21. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OSCR or MIRA?
MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -3. 8% for Oscar Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MIRA leads at 0. 0% versus -3. 4% for OSCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSCR leads at 14. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or MIRA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OSCR or MIRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MIRA: -84. 1%, OSCR: -48. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OSCR and MIRA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MIRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.