Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Pharmaceuticals |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $40M | $1.44B | $964M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.30B | $0.00 | $2.21B | $3M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $-28M | $-57M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | — | 42.5% | -259.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | — | -2.6% | -34.6% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | — | 65.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $430M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $3M | $78M | $18M |
OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) | 100 | 332.9 | +232.9% |
| MIRA Pharmaceutical… (MIRA) | 100 | 15.9 | -84.1% |
| Clover Health Inves… (CLOV) | 100 | 215.3 | +115.3% |
| Atai Beckley N.V (ATAI) | 100 | 262.1 | +162.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -40.0% 10Y total return vs ATAI's -47.7%
- Better valuation composite
- -0.3% margin vs ATAI's -51.1%
- -0.6% ROA vs MIRA's -372.3%
MIRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 103.2% revenue growth vs ATAI's -1.9%
CLOV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.22
- Rev growth 40.3%, EPS growth -93.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 1.47x
- Beta 1.22 vs OSCR's 1.84
ATAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 3.21x
- +188.5% vs CLOV's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 103.2% revenue growth vs ATAI's -1.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.3% margin vs ATAI's -51.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs OSCR's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +188.5% vs CLOV's -25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs MIRA's -372.3% |
OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OSCR leads in 3 of 6 categories
MIRA leads 0 • CLOV leads 0 • ATAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSCR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSCR and MIRA operate at a comparable scale, with $13.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. OSCR is the more profitable business, keeping -0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATAI's -51.1%. On growth, ATAI holds the edge at +17.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $0 | $2.2B | $3M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | -$7M | -$55M | -$103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | -$28M | -$57M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.8B | -$5M | $55M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | — | +42.5% | -2.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | — | -2.6% | -34.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | — | -2.6% | -51.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | — | +2.5% | -29.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.6% | — | +62.0% | +17.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.0% | -7.4% | — | -75.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OSCR and CLOV each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $40M | $1.4B | $964M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $37M | $1.4B | $971M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.35x | -1.96x | -16.59x | -4.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.65x | — | 65.89x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | — | 0.75x | 3130.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.58x | 7.02x | 4.72x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.11x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OSCR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSCR delivers a -3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MIRA. ATAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OSCR's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSCR scores 4/9 vs ATAI's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -3.8% | -17.1% | -96.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -3.7% | -9.6% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -34.0% | -45.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.3% | -2.4% | -24.5% | -50.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | — | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | -$3M | -$78M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $3M | $78M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $0 | $0 | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.57x | -48.40x | — | -68.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSCR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSCR five years ago would be worth $9,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,558 for MIRA. Over the past 12 months, ATAI leads with a +188.5% total return vs CLOV's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLOV at 47.6% vs MIRA's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | -32.9% | +17.0% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.6% | -13.8% | -25.2% | +188.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.5% | -84.4% | +221.7% | +99.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -84.4% | -67.3% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.0% | -84.4% | -72.4% | -47.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.5% | -46.2% | +47.6% | +25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSCR and CLOV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLOV is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSCR's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSCR currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs MIRA's 40.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.72x | 1.22x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.80 | $2.45 | $3.92 | $6.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.69 | $0.90 | $1.58 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.7% | +40.8% | +71.9% | +59.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.5 | 42.6 | 69.5 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.5M | 159K | 5.6M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSCR as "Hold", CLOV as "Hold", ATAI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 199.3% upside for ATAI (target: $12) vs -19.7% for OSCR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | — | $3.33 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — | 9 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
OSCR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
OSCR vs MIRA vs CLOV vs ATAI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the stronger pick with 40. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Atai Beckley N. V (ATAI). Analysts rate Atai Beckley N. V (ATAI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI?
Over the past 5 years, Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) delivered a total return of -7. 3%, compared to -84. 4% for MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MIRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSCR returned -40. 0% versus MIRA's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Oscar Health, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning OSCR is approximately 51% more volatile than CLOV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atai Beckley N. V (ATAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 44% for Oscar Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is pulling ahead at 40. 3% versus -1. 9% for Atai Beckley N. V (ATAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 21. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSCR leads at 41. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI?
MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MIRA leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oscar Health, Inc.
(OSCR) trades at 34. 7x forward P/E versus 65. 9x for Clover Health Investments, Corp. — 31. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATAI: 199. 3% to $12. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is OSCR or MIRA or CLOV or ATAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clover Health Investments, Corp.
(CLOV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22)). Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLOV: -72. 4%, OSCR: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OSCR and MIRA and CLOV and ATAI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OSCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MIRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.