OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$9.70B
5Y Perf.+113.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OSK vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-56.0%
OSK vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OSK | MAN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $9.70B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.80B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $731M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.10B | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $480M | $871M |
OSK vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OSK
MAN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) | 100 | 213.5 | +113.5% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSK vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OSK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. ManpowerGroup Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
The Growth Play
OSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -2.9%, EPS growth -3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.5%
- 268.2% 10Y total return vs MAN's -30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 24.3%, current ratio 1.94x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Income Pick
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.03, yield 4.7%, current ratio 1.11x
- 0.6% revenue growth vs OSK's -2.9%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MAN | 0.6% revenue growth vs OSK's -2.9% |
| Value | MAN | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 13.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | OSK | 6.8% margin vs MAN's -0.1% |
| Stability / Safety | MAN | Beta 1.03 vs OSK's 1.49 |
| Dividends | OSK | 0.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs MAN's 4.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | OSK | +75.4% vs MAN's -17.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OSK | 7.3% ROA vs MAN's -0.1%, ROIC 14.1% vs 5.6% |
OSK vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2018
FY 2024
OSK vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOSKLAGGINGMAN
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
1leads
OSKOshkosh Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MANMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OSK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MAN4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OSK9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OSK6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 1.7x OSK's $10.8B. OSK is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAN's -0.1%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OSKOshkosh Corporati… | MANManpowerGroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.8B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $731M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +36.2% |
OSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OSK's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAN's 9.0x.
| Metric | OSKOshkosh Corporati… | MANManpowerGroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.7B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.31x | -104.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.74x | 8.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.83x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.65x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.70x | — |
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSK delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MAN. OSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSK scores 7/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | OSKOshkosh Corporati… | MANManpowerGroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $621M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $480M | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.69x | 1.98x |
OSK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSK five years ago would be worth $12,088 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, OSK leads with a +75.4% total return vs MAN's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSK at 27.9% vs MAN's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OSKOshkosh Corporati… | MANManpowerGroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.4% | -17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.2% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +268.2% | -30.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.9% | -18.8% |
OSK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSK and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAN is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSK's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSK currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OSKOshkosh Corporati… | MANManpowerGroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.49 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $87.70 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 581K | 1.1M |
Evenly matched — OSK and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OSK and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OSK as "Buy" and MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.5% upside for MAN (target: $38) vs 9.5% for OSK (target: $168). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs OSK's 0.23%.
| Metric | OSKOshkosh Corporati… | MANManpowerGroup Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $168.00 | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +2.7% |
Evenly matched — OSK and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
OSK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallOshkosh Corporation (OSK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OSK vs MAN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSK or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Oshkosh Corporation (OSK). Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSK or MAN?
On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSK or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) delivered a total return of +20.
9%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSK returned +268. 2% versus MAN's -30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSK or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Oshkosh Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning OSK is approximately 44% more volatile than MAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSK or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -2. 9% for Oshkosh Corporation (OSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oshkosh Corporation grew EPS -3. 5% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSK leads at 11. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSK or MAN?
Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
2% net margin versus -0. 1% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSK leads at 9. 1% versus 1. 3% for MAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSK leads at 16. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSK or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Oshkosh Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAN: 24. 5% to $37. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSK or MAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 0. 2% for Oshkosh Corporation (OSK).
09Is OSK or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAN: -30. 8%, OSK: +268. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSK and MAN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OSK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MAN pays a dividend while OSK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OSK: 3.5% · MAN: 7.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.