Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Consumer Electronics
Specialty Business Services
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Consumer Electronics | Specialty Business Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $10M | $3.10B | $252M | $1.11B | $205M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72M | $830M | $5M | $1.09B | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $44M | $-32.28B | $-137M | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 5.9% | 30.6% | -0.0% | 22.4% | -14.4% |
| Operating Margin | -25.8% | 5.3% | -5.2% | 3.6% | -57.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 58.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $26M | $597M | $1.00B | $250M | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $826M | $21.15B | $337M | $32M |
OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ostin Technology Gr… (OST) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Himax Technologies,… (HIMX) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
| Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
| Eastman Kodak Compa… (KODK) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HIMX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 104.8% 10Y total return vs KODK's -2.6%
- 5.3% margin vs MVIS's -78.6%
- +139.9% vs OST's -98.4%
- 2.6% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 3.5% vs -10.7%
VUZI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.49, yield 9.3%
- Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 61.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
- 9.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HIMX's 2.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
KODK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 35.1%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 1.57, yield 0.2%, current ratio 3.14x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.57 vs VUZI's 3.49
Among these 5 stocks, MVIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1K% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs MVIS's -78.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs VUZI's 3.49 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HIMX's 2.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +139.9% vs OST's -98.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs VUZI's -321.3%, ROIC 3.5% vs -10.7% |
OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMX leads in 3 of 6 categories
VUZI leads 2 • OST leads 0 • KODK leads 0 • MVIS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KODK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 899.8x MVIS's $1M. HIMX is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVIS's -78.6%. On growth, VUZI holds the edge at +4933.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72M | $830M | $5M | $1.1B | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $67M | -$30.9B | $61M | -$64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $44M | -$32.3B | -$137M | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $119M | -$20.8B | $466M | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +30.6% | -0.0% | +22.4% | -14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -25.8% | +5.3% | -5.2% | +3.6% | -57.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | +5.3% | -5.1% | -12.6% | -78.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +14.4% | -3.3% | +42.9% | -49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | -14.4% | +4933.1% | +7.3% | -86.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.5% | -74.1% | +25.0% | -50.0% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
VUZI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KODK's 19.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMX's 43.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $3.1B | $252M | $1.1B | $205M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $2.9B | -$19.9B | $1.0B | $209M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 68.42x | -7.40x | -6.41x | -1.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 58.33x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.10x | — | 19.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 3.73x | 0.04x | 1.04x | 169.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 3.44x | 0.01x | 1.44x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.88x | — | 2.50x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMX delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VUZI. VUZI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OST's 2.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KODK scores 7/9 vs VUZI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +4.9% | -5.2% | -18.7% | -137.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.5% | +2.6% | -3.2% | -7.6% | -74.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.2% | +3.5% | -10.7% | +2.1% | -98.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -76.8% | +4.7% | -184.6% | +1.6% | -93.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.34x | 0.66x | 0.04x | 0.35x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | -$229M | -$20.1B | -$87M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $826M | $21.2B | $337M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $597M | $1.0B | $250M | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.80x | 15.55x | — | 0.81x | -3.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMX five years ago would be worth $16,628 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for OST. Over the past 12 months, HIMX leads with a +139.9% total return vs OST's -98.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KODK at 50.0% vs OST's -82.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +108.6% | -19.2% | +35.2% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.4% | +139.9% | +70.9% | +70.3% | -41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +177.6% | -23.4% | +237.6% | -71.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +66.3% | -82.0% | +62.5% | -95.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +104.8% | -30.1% | -2.6% | -63.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.1% | +40.5% | -8.5% | +50.0% | -34.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OST and HIMX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OST is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VUZI's 3.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIMX currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs OST's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.07x | 2.17x | 3.49x | 1.57x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $235.00 | $19.30 | $4.29 | $14.87 | $1.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $6.85 | $1.74 | $4.94 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +92.2% | +72.5% | +76.7% | +38.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 5.5 | 77.8 | 60.3 | 70.1 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 4.2M | 946K | 1.3M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
VUZI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIMX as "Buy", VUZI as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 647.9% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs -55.0% for HIMX (target: $8). For income investors, VUZI offers the higher dividend yield at 9.29% vs KODK's 0.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $6.00 | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 5 | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +9.3% | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $0.29 | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
HIMX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VUZI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
OST vs HIMX vs VUZI vs KODK vs MVIS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is the stronger pick with 1090% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) offers the better valuation at 68. 4x trailing P/E (58. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS?
Over the past 5 years, Himax Technologies, Inc.
(HIMX) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Ostin Technology Group Co. , Ltd. (OST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMX returned +104. 8% versus OST's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 07β versus Vuzix Corporation's 3. 49β — meaning VUZI is approximately -4868% more volatile than OST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Ostin Technology Group Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vuzix Corporation (VUZI) is pulling ahead at 1090% versus -74.
3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ostin Technology Group Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 97. 4% year-over-year, compared to -297. 8% for Eastman Kodak Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, VUZI leads at 709. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS?
Himax Technologies, Inc.
(HIMX) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMX leads at 5. 3% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMX leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 647.
9% to $5. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS?
In this comparison, VUZI (9.
3% yield), HIMX (2. 1% yield), KODK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. OST, MVIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OST or HIMX or VUZI or KODK or MVIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ostin Technology Group Co.
, Ltd. (OST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 07)). MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OST: -100. 0%, MVIS: -63. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OST and HIMX and VUZI and KODK and MVIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OST (Technology) and HIMX (Technology) and VUZI (Technology) and KODK (Industrials) and MVIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OST is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VUZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; KODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HIMX, VUZI pay a dividend while OST, KODK, MVIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.