OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
Leisure
Market Cap$2.49B
5Y Perf.+30.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OSW vs MNTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MNTN
MNTN Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$724M
5Y Perf.-63.6%
OSW vs MNTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OSW | MNTN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $2.49B | $724M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $989M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $78M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $103M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $210M |
OSW vs MNTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OSW
MNTN
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneSpaWorld Holding… (OSW) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
| MNTN Inc. (MNTN) | 100 | 36.4 | -63.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSW vs MNTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OSW leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. MNTN Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
The Income Pick
OSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.7%
- 157.2% 10Y total return vs MNTN's -65.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 18.9%, current ratio 1.91x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MNTN
MNTN Inc.
The Growth Play
MNTN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 79.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 28.6% revenue growth vs OSW's 7.4%
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.5x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNTN | 28.6% revenue growth vs OSW's 7.4% |
| Value | MNTN | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | OSW | 7.9% margin vs MNTN's 7.8% |
| Stability / Safety | OSW | Beta 1.12 vs MNTN's 1.43 |
| Dividends | OSW | 0.7% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OSW | +32.7% vs MNTN's -65.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OSW | 10.8% ROA vs MNTN's 6.6%, ROIC 10.6% vs 18.9% |
OSW vs MNTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
OSW vs MNTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOSWLAGGINGMNTN
MNTNMNTN Inc.
2leads
OSWOneSpaWorld Holdings …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MNTNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MNTN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MNTN5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OSW6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
OSW2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSW is the larger business by revenue, generating $989M annually — 3.3x MNTN's $299M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.9% (OSW) to 7.8% (MNTN).
| Metric | OSWOneSpaWorld Holdi… | MNTNMNTN Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $989M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | +137.9% |
MNTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MNTN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MNTN's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OSW's 22.9x.
| Metric | OSWOneSpaWorld Holdi… | MNTNMNTN Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $724M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $514M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.62x | -105.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.53x | 9.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.87x | 15.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.70x | 15.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.43x | 12.83x |
MNTN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OSW and MNTN each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSW delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for MNTN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSW scores 6/9 vs MNTN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OSWOneSpaWorld Holdi… | MNTNMNTN Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.1% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +12.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $86M | -$210M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $103M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.88x | 14.94x |
Evenly matched — OSW and MNTN each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSW five years ago would be worth $23,628 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,483 for MNTN. Over the past 12 months, OSW leads with a +32.7% total return vs MNTN's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSW at 27.1% vs MNTN's -29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OSWOneSpaWorld Holdi… | MNTNMNTN Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | -24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | -65.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | -65.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.3% | -65.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.2% | -65.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | -29.6% |
OSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OSW is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTN's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs MNTN's 28.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OSWOneSpaWorld Holdi… | MNTNMNTN Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $32.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.19 | $7.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +28.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 842K | 644K |
OSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 144.3% upside for MNTN (target: $22) vs 11.9% for OSW (target: $28). OSW is the only dividend payer here at 0.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | OSWOneSpaWorld Holdi… | MNTNMNTN Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $22.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +1.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MNTN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OSW leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallOneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OSW vs MNTN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSW or MNTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 4% for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW). OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSW or MNTN?
On forward P/E, MNTN Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSW or MNTN?
Over the past 5 years, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) delivered a total return of +136.
3%, compared to -65. 2% for MNTN Inc. (MNTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSW returned +157. 2% versus MNTN's -65. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSW or MNTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus MNTN Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning MNTN is approximately 28% more volatile than OSW relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — OSW or MNTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus 7. 4% for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MNTN Inc. grew EPS 79. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTN leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSW or MNTN?
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
5% net margin versus -2. 2% for MNTN Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSW leads at 9. 1% versus 8. 3% for MNTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTN leads at 76. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSW or MNTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNTN: 144. 3% to $22. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSW or MNTN?
In this comparison, OSW (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MNTN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OSW or MNTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 0. 7% yield, +157. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OSW: +157. 2%, MNTN: -65. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSW and MNTN?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSW (Consumer Cyclical) and MNTN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNTN is a small-cap high-growth stock. OSW pays a dividend while MNTN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OSW: 12.7% · MNTN: 14.2%)Net Margin>
%
(OSW: 7.9% · MNTN: 7.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.