Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $2.49B | $724M | $11.18B | $2.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $989M | $299M | $2.97B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $78M | $23M | $433M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 80.0% | 77.8% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 13.8% | 20.3% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 9.9x | 21.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $103M | $0.00 | $436M | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $210M | $658M | $553M |
OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneSpaWorld Holding… (OSW) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
| MNTN Inc. (MNTN) | 100 | 36.4 | -63.6% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 31.2 | -68.8% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 157.2% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- 0.7% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +32.7% vs MNTN's -65.2%
- 10.8% ROA vs MGNI's 5.3%, ROIC 10.6% vs 9.5%
MNTN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 79.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 28.6% revenue growth vs MGNI's 6.9%
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.2x)
TTD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.06
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.06 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage
MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 22.0% margin vs MNTN's 7.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.6% revenue growth vs MGNI's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs MNTN's 7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs MNTN's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs MGNI's 5.3%, ROIC 10.6% vs 9.5% |
OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 1 of 6 categories
OSW leads 1 • MNTN leads 0 • MGNI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNTN and TTD and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 9.9x MNTN's $299M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTN's 7.8%. On growth, MNTN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $989M | $299M | $3.0B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $52M | $693M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $23M | $433M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $20M | $837M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +80.0% | +77.8% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +13.8% | +20.3% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +7.8% | +14.6% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +6.5% | +28.2% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +14.2% | +11.8% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | +137.9% | -20.0% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNTN and MGNI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 59% valuation discount to OSW's 35.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OSW's 22.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $724M | $11.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $514M | $11.0B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.62x | -105.52x | 25.81x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.53x | 9.92x | 21.21x | 13.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.96x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.87x | 15.16x | 15.54x | 11.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 2.50x | 3.86x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.70x | 15.28x | 4.56x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.43x | 12.83x | 14.05x | 12.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for MNTN. TTD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSW scores 6/9 vs MNTN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.1% | +8.3% | +16.9% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +18.9% | +21.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +12.2% | +19.2% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | — | 0.18x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $86M | -$210M | -$222M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $210M | $658M | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $103M | $0 | $436M | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.88x | 14.94x | 1591.47x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSW five years ago would be worth $23,628 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,483 for MNTN. Over the past 12 months, OSW leads with a +32.7% total return vs MNTN's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSW at 27.1% vs MNTN's -29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | -24.7% | -37.7% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | -65.2% | -58.4% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | -65.2% | -63.7% | +58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.3% | -65.2% | -64.5% | -60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.2% | -65.2% | +680.4% | -4.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | -29.6% | -28.7% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSW and TTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.43x | 1.06x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $32.49 | $91.45 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.19 | $7.71 | $19.74 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +28.3% | +25.7% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 42.2 | 52.8 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 842K | 644K | 20.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSW as "Buy", TTD as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 144.3% upside for MNTN (target: $22) vs 11.9% for OSW (target: $28). OSW is the only dividend payer here at 0.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $22.43 | $37.12 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — | 46 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +1.4% | +12.3% | +2.3% |
TTD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). OSW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
OSW vs MNTN vs TTD vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, MNTN Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) delivered a total return of +136.
3%, compared to -65. 2% for MNTN Inc. (MNTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus MNTN's -65. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 53% more volatile than TTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus 6. 9% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTN leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -2. 2% for MNTN Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus 8. 3% for MNTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MNTN Inc.
(MNTN) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNTN: 144. 3% to $22. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI?
In this comparison, OSW (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MNTN, TTD, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OSW or MNTN or TTD or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 0. 7% yield, +157. 2% 10Y return). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OSW: +157. 2%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSW and MNTN and TTD and MGNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSW (Consumer Cyclical) and MNTN (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNTN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. OSW pays a dividend while MNTN, TTD, MGNI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.