OTIS vs CARR vs TT vs JCI vs EMR

For growth investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) is the cheapest at 22.

1x versus Johnson Controls International plc at 52. 9x. On forward P/E, Otis Worldwide Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trane Technologies plc wins at 1. 06x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Trane Technologies plc (TT) delivered a total return of +164.

3%, compared to +7. 7% for Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TT returned +874. 8% versus OTIS's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

39β versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 1. 52β — meaning EMR is approximately 288% more volatile than OTIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trane Technologies plc (TT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 90% for Carrier Global Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trane Technologies plc (TT) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Emerson Electric Co. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -72. 4% for Carrier Global Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TT leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus 6. 9% for Carrier Global Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 9. 9% for CARR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Trane Technologies plc — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OTIS: 18. 8% to $92. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Trane Technologies plc (TT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

97), 0. 8% yield, +874. 8% 10Y return). Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TT: +874. 8%, EMR: +206. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.