Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $355M | $1712.35T | $358.42B | $30.32B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $0.00 | $61.16B | $16.63B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-168M | $4.23B | $1.39B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 99.2% | — | 70.2% | 26.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.9% | — | 26.7% | 13.9% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.3x | 14.1x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $22M | $69.07B | $16.17B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $194M | $5.23B | $1.98B | $214M |
OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovid Therapeutics I… (OVID) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OVID is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 35.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.0%
- 11.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- +8.2% vs ABBV's +11.3%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.67x
ABBV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Beta 0.34 vs CRL's 1.52
- 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.4x)
- 8.3% margin vs OVID's -240.1%
- 4.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs OVID's -240.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs CRL's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs ABBV's +11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • OVID leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OVID's -2.4%. On growth, OVID holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $0 | $61.2B | $16.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | -$112M | $24.5B | $3.5B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$168M | $4.2B | $1.4B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | -$151M | $18.7B | $2.7B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.2% | — | +70.2% | +26.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | — | +26.7% | +13.9% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | — | +6.9% | +8.3% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | — | +30.6% | +16.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | — | +10.0% | +8.4% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +192.3% | +91.5% | +57.4% | +15.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 73% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $355M | $1712.35T | $358.4B | $30.3B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $344M | $1712.35T | $422.3B | $44.5B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.38x | -0.76x | 85.50x | 22.79x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.28x | 14.06x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.96x | 12.97x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 49.01x | — | 5.86x | 1.86x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 0.66x | — | 4.67x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 20.12x | 14.78x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. OVID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.0% | -130.2% | +62.1% | +22.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -89.0% | +3.1% | +4.7% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.2% | — | +23.9% | +8.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.8% | -145.7% | +21.5% | +11.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | — | 2.44x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$172M | $63.8B | $14.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $194M | $5.2B | $2.0B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $22M | $69.1B | $16.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 3.28x | 3.10x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, OVID leads with a +816.7% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs OVID's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.1% | +4.9% | -10.1% | -20.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +816.7% | +110.4% | +11.3% | +16.5% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.1% | +19.7% | +50.4% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -69.1% | +101.3% | -23.8% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | -87.0% | +295.5% | +166.5% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | +6.2% | +14.6% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OVID and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OVID currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.26x | 0.34x | 1.33x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.10 | $26.18 | $244.81 | $247.05 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $7.53 | $176.57 | $134.65 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +76.3% | +82.8% | +72.3% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 48.1 | 46.8 | 58.5 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 252K | 5.8M | 1.6M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OVID as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $46.33 | $256.64 | $225.63 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 15 | 41 | 44 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 13 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.57 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +4.1% | +4.0% |
ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OVID vs DBVT vs ABBV vs IQV vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
(OVID) is the stronger pick with 1181% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (OVID) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 349% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (OVID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
(OVID) is pulling ahead at 1181% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ovid Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 35. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OVID leads at 69. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -240. 1% for Ovid Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -585. 2% for OVID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVID leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. OVID, DBVT, IQV, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OVID or DBVT or ABBV or IQV or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, OVID: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OVID and DBVT and ABBV and IQV and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OVID is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while OVID, DBVT, IQV, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.