Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Information Technology Services
Banks - Diversified
OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Information Technology Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $294M | $79.60B | $50.58B | $20.26B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $92M | $12.64B | $8.27B | $11.66B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $3.30B | $1.91B | $2.67B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 88.3% | 61.9% | 54.8% | 37.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.5% | 38.7% | 29.5% | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 17.3x | 22.6x | 6.2x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $20.28B | $9.93B | $4.01B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $837M | $814M | $599M | $343.34B |
OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) | 100 | 275.9 | +175.9% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OVLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 3.7%, current ratio 148.25x
- Beta 0.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 148.25x
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +35.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 26.1% margin vs JPM's 20.4%
- Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
NDAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 60.1%
- 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs OVLY's -8.6%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs NDAQ's 2.12
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
- 7.5% ROA vs OVLY's 1.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs 11.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs NDAQ's 344.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs OVLY's -8.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.1% margin vs JPM's 20.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs OVLY's 1.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs 11.5% |
OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories
OVLY leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • NDAQ leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3059.6x OVLY's $92M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $92M | $12.6B | $8.3B | $11.7B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $6.5B | $3.1B | $4.1B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $3.3B | $1.9B | $2.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $4.3B | $2.0B | $2.8B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.3% | +61.9% | +54.8% | +37.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +38.7% | +29.5% | +17.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +26.1% | +23.1% | +22.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +33.9% | +24.2% | +23.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +23.1% | +33.8% | +30.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OVLY and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, OVLY trades at a 77% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ICE's 2.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $294M | $79.6B | $50.6B | $20.3B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $99.0B | $59.7B | $23.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.15x | 24.36x | 28.80x | 52.27x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.34x | 22.60x | 6.24x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.07x | 2.74x | 2.69x | 2.14x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.23x | 15.34x | 20.14x | 6.50x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 6.30x | 6.15x | 1.90x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 2.77x | 4.19x | 1.46x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.99x | 18.56x | 25.43x | 7.21x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OVLY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $12 for ICE. OVLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | +11.6% | +15.9% | +18.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +2.3% | +6.4% | +7.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +7.5% | +8.1% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +9.5% | +10.2% | +6.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.70x | 0.81x | 0.29x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$195M | $19.4B | $9.1B | $3.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $837M | $814M | $599M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $20.3B | $9.9B | $4.0B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.30x | 6.53x | 14.11x | 21.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, OVLY leads with a +35.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | -11.8% | -7.3% | -38.9% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.1% | -20.4% | +4.0% | -49.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.4% | +34.6% | +80.8% | -18.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +30.9% | +60.2% | -67.3% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +303.2% | +195.3% | +344.3% | -25.6% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.8% | +10.4% | +21.8% | -6.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OVLY and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OVLY currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.35x | 0.71x | 0.61x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.85 | $189.35 | $101.79 | $82.74 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.25 | $136.67 | $77.09 | $37.91 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +74.2% | +87.4% | +47.4% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 31.9 | 41.2 | 30.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 3.2M | 3.0M | 5.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.00 | $113.83 | $62.88 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 36 | 37 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +4.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.93 | $1.04 | $1.63 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.2% | +7.0% | +3.9% |
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OVLY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
OVLY vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 6% for Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY). Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Nasdaq, Inc. 's 2. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 168% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -8. 6% for Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nasdaq, Inc. grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM?
Oak Valley Bancorp (OVLY) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVLY leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Nasdaq, Inc. 's 2. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ).
09Is OVLY or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OVLY and ICE and NDAQ and FIS and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (OVLY (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and NDAQ (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OVLY is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.