Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OZ vs IIPR vs GOOD vs EPRT vs GTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
OZ vs IIPR vs GOOD vs EPRT vs GTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $185M | $1.62B | $616M | $6.81B | $2.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $263M | $166M | $593M | $227M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $120M | $21M | $257M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | -73.7% | 60.3% | -11.7% | 84.7% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | -201.6% | 46.7% | 27.9% | 65.0% | 58.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x | 83.0x | 24.1x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $181M | $394M | $856M | $2.52B | $1.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $48M | $11M | $60M | $13M |
OZ vs IIPR vs GOOD vs EPRT vs GTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 69.3 | -30.7% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 230.7 | +130.7% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZ vs IIPR vs GOOD vs EPRT vs GTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 13.5%
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 22.0x)
- 45.6% margin vs OZ's -5.1%
- 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs GOOD's 11.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, GOOD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EPRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 11.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 190.2% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 436.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 59.9%, current ratio 6.13x
- PEG 1.01 vs IIPR's 3.52
GTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.8%, current ratio 29.85x
- +23.6% vs OZ's -19.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 22.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs OZ's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs IIPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs GOOD's 11.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.6% vs OZ's -19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs OZ's -6.4%, ROIC 4.3% vs -2.6% |
OZ vs IIPR vs GOOD vs EPRT vs GTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories
EPRT leads 1 • IIPR leads 1 • OZ leads 0 • GTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $593M annually — 82.2x OZ's $7M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OZ's -5.1%. On growth, OZ holds the edge at +177.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $263M | $166M | $593M | $227M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $197M | $106M | $548M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $120M | $21M | $257M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $144M | $90M | -$151M | $131M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -73.7% | +60.3% | -11.7% | +84.7% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +46.7% | +27.9% | +65.0% | +58.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +45.6% | +12.7% | +43.3% | +40.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +54.7% | +54.1% | -25.5% | +57.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +177.0% | -3.8% | +11.8% | +24.1% | +10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.6% | -1.0% | +2.8% | -3.4% | +76.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 54% valuation discount to GOOD's 31.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs IIPR's 3.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $185M | $1.6B | $616M | $6.8B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $2.0B | $1.5B | $9.3B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.73x | 14.40x | 31.02x | 24.59x | 24.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.17x | 82.97x | 24.13x | 21.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.85x | 0.88x | 1.03x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.91x | 12.36x | 17.96x | 16.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.05x | 6.08x | 3.82x | 12.11x | 9.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 0.87x | 1.76x | 1.51x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.26x | 9.17x | 17.86x | 15.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IIPR and GTY each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-13 for OZ. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPRT scores 5/9 vs OZ's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | +6.4% | +9.7% | +6.3% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +5.1% | +1.7% | +3.8% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +4.3% | +4.4% | +4.4% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +5.8% | +5.3% | +5.8% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.21x | 2.50x | 0.60x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | $346M | $846M | $2.5B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $48M | $11M | $60M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $181M | $394M | $856M | $2.5B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.35x | 6.67x | 1.46x | 3.17x | 2.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPRT five years ago would be worth $14,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,999 for IIPR. Over the past 12 months, GTY leads with a +23.6% total return vs OZ's -19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.9% vs OZ's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | +18.3% | +21.6% | +5.7% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.5% | +20.3% | +0.7% | +2.8% | +23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +14.1% | +43.8% | +38.2% | +12.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | -50.0% | -9.7% | +43.1% | +32.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.2% | +436.4% | +51.0% | +190.2% | +133.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +4.5% | +12.9% | +11.4% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPRT and GTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTY currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs OZ's 73.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.92x | 0.55x | 0.01x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.00 | $61.40 | $15.03 | $34.73 | $34.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.50 | $44.58 | $10.33 | $28.95 | $25.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.6% | +92.2% | +84.6% | +90.6% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 59.3 | 49.1 | 45.6 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 303K | 390K | 2.0M | 415K |
Analyst Outlook
IIPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IIPR as "Hold", GOOD as "Buy", EPRT as "Buy", GTY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, IIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.46% vs EPRT's 3.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.00 | $13.00 | $36.50 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 14 | 22 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.5% | +11.4% | +3.7% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.62 | $1.44 | $1.16 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). EPRT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
OZ vs IIPR vs GOOD vs EPRT vs GTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation at 31. 0x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 3. 52x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY?
Over the past 5 years, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) delivered a total return of +43. 1%, compared to -50. 0% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus OZ's -49. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIPR is approximately 10300% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -62. 6% for Belpointe PREP, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, OZ leads at 39. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -891. 8% for Belpointe PREP, LLC — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus -504. 3% for OZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 3. 52x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 69. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 0% to $36. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY?
In this comparison, IIPR (13.
5% yield), GOOD (11. 4% yield), GTY (5. 8% yield), EPRT (3. 7% yield) pay a dividend. OZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OZ or IIPR or GOOD or EPRT or GTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +190. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +190. 2%, OZ: -49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OZ and IIPR and GOOD and EPRT and GTY?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; GTY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. IIPR, GOOD, EPRT, GTY pay a dividend while OZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.