Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PACS vs SEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
PACS vs SEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $5.27B | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.29B | $5.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $192M | $134M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 10.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.20B | $3.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $27M |
PACS vs SEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
| Select Medical Hold… (SEM) | 100 | 107.6 | +7.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PACS vs SEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PACS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
- Rev growth 29.3%, EPS growth 221.1%
- 29.3% NII/revenue growth vs SEM's 5.1%
SEM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 158.5% 10Y total return vs PACS's 46.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.04x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.3% NII/revenue growth vs SEM's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 16.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs SEM's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs PACS's 0.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.6% vs SEM's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs SEM's 2.3%, ROIC 5.6% vs 4.8% |
PACS vs SEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PACS vs SEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEM and PACS operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $5.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.6% (PACS) to 2.4% (SEM).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $365M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $192M | $134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $254M | $117M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +10.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SEM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, SEM trades at a 49% valuation discount to PACS's 27.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEM's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PACS's 22.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.56x | 13.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.24x | 13.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.63x | 12.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.53x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PACS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PACS delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $7 for SEM. SEM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACS's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PACS scores 6/9 vs SEM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.36x | 1.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PACS five years ago would be worth $14,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,886 for SEM. Over the past 12 months, PACS leads with a +219.6% total return vs SEM's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACS at 13.5% vs SEM's 2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +219.6% | +11.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | +7.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | -11.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | +158.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACS's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEM currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs PACS's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.08 | $16.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.50 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 772K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PACS as "Buy" and SEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for PACS (target: $45) vs 9.5% for SEM (target: $18). SEM is the only dividend payer here at 1.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.67 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.9% |
PACS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
PACS vs SEM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PACS or SEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is the stronger pick with 29. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PACS or SEM?
On trailing P/E, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the cheapest at 13.
9x versus PACS Group, Inc. at 27. 6x. On forward P/E, Select Medical Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PACS or SEM?
Over the past 5 years, PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) delivered a total return of +46. 2%, compared to -11. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEM returned +158. 5% versus PACS's +46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PACS or SEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
46β versus PACS Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning PACS is approximately 39% more volatile than SEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 182% versus 3% for PACS Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PACS or SEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is pulling ahead at 29. 3% versus 5. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PACS Group, Inc. grew EPS 221. 1% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PACS or SEM?
PACS Group, Inc.
(PACS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 2. 7% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEM leads at 6. 1% versus 5. 9% for PACS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PACS leads at 21. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PACS or SEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) trades at 13.
1x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for PACS Group, Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PACS: 32. 9% to $44. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PACS or SEM?
In this comparison, SEM (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. PACS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PACS or SEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
46), 1. 5% yield, +158. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEM: +158. 5%, PACS: +46. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PACS and SEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PACS (Financial Services) and SEM (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PACS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SEM is a small-cap deep-value stock. SEM pays a dividend while PACS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.