Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PACS vs SEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PACS
PACS Group, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.27B
5Y Perf.+34.6%
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.04B
5Y Perf.+7.6%

PACS vs SEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PACS logoPACS
SEM logoSEM
IndustryFinancial - ConglomeratesMedical - Care Facilities
Market Cap$5.27B$2.04B
Revenue (TTM)$5.29B$5.52B
Net Income (TTM)$192M$134M
Gross Margin21.9%10.6%
Operating Margin5.9%5.8%
Forward P/E16.2x13.1x
Total Debt$3.20B$3.70B
Cash & Equiv.$197M$27M

PACS vs SEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PACS
SEM
StockApr 24May 26Return
PACS Group, Inc. (PACS)100134.6+34.6%
Select Medical Hold… (SEM)100107.6+7.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PACS vs SEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PACS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Select Medical Holdings Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PACS
PACS Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PACS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
  • Rev growth 29.3%, EPS growth 221.1%
  • 29.3% NII/revenue growth vs SEM's 5.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

SEM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 158.5% 10Y total return vs PACS's 46.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, current ratio 1.04x
  • Beta 0.46, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.04x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPACS logoPACS29.3% NII/revenue growth vs SEM's 5.1%
ValueSEM logoSEMLower P/E (13.1x vs 16.2x)
Quality / MarginsPACS logoPACS3.6% margin vs SEM's 2.4%
Stability / SafetySEM logoSEMBeta 0.46 vs PACS's 0.64, lower leverage
DividendsSEM logoSEM1.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PACS logoPACS+219.6% vs SEM's +11.1%
Efficiency (ROA)PACS logoPACS3.4% ROA vs SEM's 2.3%, ROIC 5.6% vs 4.8%

PACS vs SEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PACSPACS Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$4.1B
SEMSelect Medical Holdings Corporation
FY 2025
Health Care, Patient Service, Non-Medicare
61.5%$3.4B
Health Care, Patient Service, Medicare
28.6%$1.6B
Service, Other
9.9%$538M

PACS vs SEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPACSLAGGINGSEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

SEM and PACS operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $5.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.6% (PACS) to 2.4% (SEM).

MetricPACS logoPACSPACS Group, Inc.SEM logoSEMSelect Medical Ho…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.3B$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$365M$465M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$192M$134M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$254M$117M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.9%+10.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.9%+5.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.6%+2.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+75.0%-18.2%
PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SEM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 13.9x trailing earnings, SEM trades at a 49% valuation discount to PACS's 27.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEM's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PACS's 22.6x.

MetricPACS logoPACSPACS Group, Inc.SEM logoSEMSelect Medical Ho…
Market CapShares × price$5.3B$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.3B$5.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.56x13.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.24x13.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.63x12.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.00x0.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.53x1.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.33x
SEM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PACS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

PACS delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $7 for SEM. SEM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACS's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PACS scores 6/9 vs SEM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPACS logoPACSPACS Group, Inc.SEM logoSEMSelect Medical Ho…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.1%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.6%+4.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.0%+7.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.36x1.82x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.0B$3.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$197M$27M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.2B$3.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.41x
PACS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PACS five years ago would be worth $14,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,886 for SEM. Over the past 12 months, PACS leads with a +219.6% total return vs SEM's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PACS at 13.5% vs SEM's 2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPACS logoPACSPACS Group, Inc.SEM logoSEMSelect Medical Ho…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.9%+11.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+219.6%+11.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.2%+7.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.2%-11.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.2%+158.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.5%+2.4%
PACS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACS's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEM currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs PACS's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPACS logoPACSPACS Group, Inc.SEM logoSEMSelect Medical Ho…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x0.46x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$43.08$16.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.50$11.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.0%+96.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.960.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded772K2.1M
SEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates PACS as "Buy" and SEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for PACS (target: $45) vs 9.5% for SEM (target: $18). SEM is the only dividend payer here at 1.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPACS logoPACSPACS Group, Inc.SEM logoSEMSelect Medical Ho…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.67$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts813
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PACS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallPACS Group, Inc. (PACS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PACS vs SEM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PACS or SEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PACS Group, Inc.

(PACS) is the stronger pick with 29. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PACS or SEM?

On trailing P/E, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the cheapest at 13.

9x versus PACS Group, Inc. at 27. 6x. On forward P/E, Select Medical Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PACS or SEM?

Over the past 5 years, PACS Group, Inc.

(PACS) delivered a total return of +46. 2%, compared to -11. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEM returned +158. 5% versus PACS's +46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PACS or SEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

46β versus PACS Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning PACS is approximately 39% more volatile than SEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 182% versus 3% for PACS Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PACS or SEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PACS Group, Inc.

(PACS) is pulling ahead at 29. 3% versus 5. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PACS Group, Inc. grew EPS 221. 1% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PACS or SEM?

PACS Group, Inc.

(PACS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 2. 7% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEM leads at 6. 1% versus 5. 9% for PACS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PACS leads at 21. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PACS or SEM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) trades at 13.

1x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for PACS Group, Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PACS: 32. 9% to $44. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PACS or SEM?

In this comparison, SEM (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. PACS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PACS or SEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

46), 1. 5% yield, +158. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEM: +158. 5%, PACS: +46. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PACS and SEM?

These companies operate in different sectors (PACS (Financial Services) and SEM (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PACS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SEM is a small-cap deep-value stock. SEM pays a dividend while PACS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

PACS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PACS and SEM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PACS: 29.3% · SEM: 5.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(PACS: 3.6% · SEM: 2.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PACS: 27.6x · SEM: 13.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.