PAMT
Pamt Corp.
Trucking
Market Cap$216M
5Y Perf.-33.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PAMT vs KNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
Trucking
Market Cap$10.30B
5Y Perf.+21.8%
PAMT vs KNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PAMT | KNX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $216M | $10.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $598M | $7.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | -9.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -12.8% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.3x |
| Total Debt | $334M | $2.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $303M |
PAMT vs KNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PAMT
KNX
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pamt Corp. (PAMT) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Knight-Swift Transp… (KNX) | 100 | 121.8 | +21.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAMT vs KNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KNX leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Pamt Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PAMT
Pamt Corp.
The Income Pick
PAMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.36
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, current ratio 1.23x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 1.23x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
KNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth -43.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- 156.2% 10Y total return vs PAMT's -34.7%
- 0.8% revenue growth vs PAMT's -16.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KNX | 0.8% revenue growth vs PAMT's -16.3% |
| Quality / Margins | KNX | 0.5% margin vs PAMT's -8.8% |
| Stability / Safety | PAMT | Beta 1.36 vs KNX's 1.40 |
| Dividends | KNX | 1.1% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | KNX | +54.4% vs PAMT's -39.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KNX | 0.3% ROA vs PAMT's -7.4%, ROIC 2.0% vs -11.4% |
PAMT vs KNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
PAMT vs KNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKNXLAGGINGPAMT
PAMTPamt Corp.
1leads
KNXKnight-Swift Transpor…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PAMTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KNX5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PAMT3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KNX7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KNX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
KNX1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 12.5x PAMT's $598M. KNX is the more profitable business, keeping 0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAMT's -8.8%. On growth, KNX holds the edge at +1.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PAMTPamt Corp. | KNXKnight-Swift Tran… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $598M | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +1.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -104.3% |
KNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PAMT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KNX's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAMT's 136.9x.
| Metric | PAMTPamt Corp. | KNXKnight-Swift Tran… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $515M | $12.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.17x | 154.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 136.89x | 12.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 1.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.50x |
PAMT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNX delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-22 for PAMT. KNX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAMT's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KNX scores 6/9 vs PAMT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PAMTPamt Corp. | KNXKnight-Swift Tran… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.4% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.5% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $299M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $303M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $334M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.48x | 1.36x |
KNX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KNX five years ago would be worth $13,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,534 for PAMT. Over the past 12 months, KNX leads with a +54.4% total return vs PAMT's -39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNX at 4.5% vs PAMT's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PAMTPamt Corp. | KNXKnight-Swift Tran… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.3% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.3% | +54.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +14.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +34.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +156.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | +4.5% |
KNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAMT and KNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAMT is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNX's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs PAMT's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PAMTPamt Corp. | KNXKnight-Swift Tran… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.29 | $67.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.15 | $38.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.7% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 3.0M |
Evenly matched — PAMT and KNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
KNX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PAMT as "Hold" and KNX as "Buy". KNX is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PAMTPamt Corp. | KNXKnight-Swift Tran… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $65.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | 0.0% |
KNX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
KNX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallKnight-Swift Transportation… (KNX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PAMT vs KNX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAMT or KNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) is the stronger pick with 0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 3% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) offers the better valuation at 154. 7x trailing P/E (34. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PAMT or KNX?
Over the past 5 years, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) delivered a total return of +34. 4%, compared to -34. 7% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNX returned +156. 2% versus PAMT's -34. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PAMT or KNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pamt Corp.
(PAMT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning KNX is approximately 3% more volatile than PAMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 159% for Pamt Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PAMT or KNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) is pulling ahead at 0. 8% versus -16. 3% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. grew EPS -43. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 9% for Pamt Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNX leads at 0. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PAMT or KNX?
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -8. 8% for Pamt Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNX leads at 3. 4% versus -13. 3% for PAMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNX leads at 28. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PAMT or KNX?
In this comparison, KNX (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PAMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PAMT or KNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNX: +156. 2%, PAMT: -34. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PAMT and KNX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KNX pays a dividend while PAMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PAMT: -15.1% · KNX: 1.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.