Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PAMT
Pamt Corp.

Trucking

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$216M
5Y Perf.-33.3%
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

Trucking

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.30B
5Y Perf.+21.8%
WERN
Werner Enterprises, Inc.

Trucking

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-1.4%
HTLD
Heartland Express, Inc.

Trucking

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.01B
5Y Perf.+20.1%

PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PAMT logoPAMT
KNX logoKNX
WERN logoWERN
HTLD logoHTLD
IndustryTruckingTruckingTruckingTrucking
Market Cap$216M$10.30B$2.18B$1.01B
Revenue (TTM)$598M$7.50B$2.97B$806M
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$34M$-14M$-52M
Gross Margin-9.1%30.6%8.3%-0.9%
Operating Margin-12.8%2.9%1.9%-7.7%
Forward P/E34.3x39.8x
Total Debt$334M$2.89B$752M$161M
Cash & Equiv.$35M$303M$60M$18M

PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PAMT
KNX
WERN
HTLD
StockOct 24May 26Return
Pamt Corp. (PAMT)10066.7-33.3%
Knight-Swift Transp… (KNX)100121.8+21.8%
Werner Enterprises,… (WERN)10098.6-1.4%
Heartland Express, … (HTLD)100120.1+20.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KNX leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Werner Enterprises, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. HTLD also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PAMT
Pamt Corp.
The Secondary Option

PAMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
KNX
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play

KNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth -43.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
  • 156.2% 10Y total return vs WERN's 78.1%
  • 0.8% revenue growth vs HTLD's -23.1%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
WERN
Werner Enterprises, Inc.
The Income Pick

WERN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 1.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 54.1%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 1.24, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 1.24 vs KNX's 1.40
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HTLD
Heartland Express, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

HTLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +72.8% vs PAMT's -39.3%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKNX logoKNX0.8% revenue growth vs HTLD's -23.1%
ValueKNX logoKNXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKNX logoKNX0.5% margin vs PAMT's -8.8%
Stability / SafetyWERN logoWERNBeta 1.24 vs KNX's 1.40
DividendsKNX logoKNX1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WERN's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HTLD logoHTLD+72.8% vs PAMT's -39.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KNX logoKNX0.3% ROA vs PAMT's -7.4%, ROIC 2.0% vs -11.4%

PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PAMTPamt Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

KNXKnight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Revenue, excluding truckload fuel surcharge
89.6%$6.7B
Truckload fuel surcharge revenue
10.4%$778M
WERNWerner Enterprises, Inc.
FY 2025
Transportation Services
97.8%$2.9B
Other revenue recognition segments
2.5%$75M
Truckload Transportation Services Segment
-0.3%$-9,297,000
HTLDHeartland Express, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKNXLAGGINGHTLD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

KNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 12.5x PAMT's $598M. KNX is the more profitable business, keeping 0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAMT's -8.8%. On growth, KNX holds the edge at +1.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPAMT logoPAMTPamt Corp.KNX logoKNXKnight-Swift Tran…WERN logoWERNWerner Enterprise…HTLD logoHTLDHeartland Express…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$598M$7.5B$3.0B$806M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$1.0B$343M$97M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M$34M-$14M-$52M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$1.3B-$69M-$67M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-9.1%+30.6%+8.3%-0.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.8%+2.9%+1.9%-7.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.8%+0.5%-0.5%-6.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.9%+17.8%-2.3%-8.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.1%+1.4%-2.3%-26.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.4%-104.3%-3.4%-9.6%
KNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PAMT and WERN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, WERN's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAMT's 136.9x.

MetricPAMT logoPAMTPamt Corp.KNX logoKNXKnight-Swift Tran…WERN logoWERNWerner Enterprise…HTLD logoHTLDHeartland Express…
Market CapShares × price$216M$10.3B$2.2B$1.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$515M$12.9B$2.9B$1.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.17x154.71x-151.58x-19.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.28x39.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple136.89x12.41x8.07x11.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.36x1.38x0.73x1.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.04x1.46x1.59x1.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.50x
Evenly matched — PAMT and WERN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KNX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KNX delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-22 for PAMT. HTLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAMT's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KNX scores 6/9 vs PAMT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPAMT logoPAMTPamt Corp.KNX logoKNXKnight-Swift Tran…WERN logoWERNWerner Enterprise…HTLD logoHTLDHeartland Express…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-21.8%+0.5%-1.0%-6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.4%+0.3%-0.5%-4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.4%+2.0%+2.5%-4.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-13.5%+2.3%+2.6%-5.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x0.41x0.54x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$299M$2.6B$692M$143M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$35M$303M$60M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$334M$2.9B$752M$161M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.48x1.36x0.47x-4.93x
KNX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KNX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KNX five years ago would be worth $13,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,534 for PAMT. Over the past 12 months, HTLD leads with a +72.8% total return vs PAMT's -39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNX at 4.5% vs PAMT's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPAMT logoPAMTPamt Corp.KNX logoKNXKnight-Swift Tran…WERN logoWERNWerner Enterprise…HTLD logoHTLDHeartland Express…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.3%+21.8%+19.8%+42.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-39.3%+54.4%+45.8%+72.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.7%+14.1%-16.5%-13.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.7%+34.4%-19.0%-27.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.7%+156.2%+78.1%-19.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.2%+4.5%-5.8%-4.8%
KNX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WERN is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNX's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WERN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs PAMT's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPAMT logoPAMTPamt Corp.KNX logoKNXKnight-Swift Tran…WERN logoWERNWerner Enterprise…HTLD logoHTLDHeartland Express…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.36x1.40x1.24x1.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.29$67.75$38.46$13.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.15$38.63$23.06$7.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.7%+93.6%+94.6%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.956.465.963.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K3.0M1.0M398K
WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KNX and WERN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PAMT as "Hold", KNX as "Buy", WERN as "Hold", HTLD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.6% upside for KNX (target: $65) vs -7.6% for HTLD (target: $12). For income investors, WERN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs HTLD's 0.62%.

MetricPAMT logoPAMTPamt Corp.KNX logoKNXKnight-Swift Tran…WERN logoWERNWerner Enterprise…HTLD logoHTLDHeartland Express…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$65.10$36.10$12.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1363622
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+1.5%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1851
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.72$0.56$0.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.9%0.0%+2.5%+1.0%
Evenly matched — KNX and WERN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KNX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WERN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallKnight-Swift Transportation… (KNX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PAMT vs KNX vs WERN vs HTLD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

(KNX) is the stronger pick with 0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for Heartland Express, Inc. (HTLD). Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) offers the better valuation at 154. 7x trailing P/E (34. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD?

On forward P/E, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

is actually cheaper at 34. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD?

Over the past 5 years, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

(KNX) delivered a total return of +34. 4%, compared to -34. 7% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNX returned +156. 2% versus PAMT's -34. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Werner Enterprises, Inc.

(WERN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning KNX is approximately 13% more volatile than WERN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heartland Express, Inc. (HTLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 159% for Pamt Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

(KNX) is pulling ahead at 0. 8% versus -23. 1% for Heartland Express, Inc. (HTLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. grew EPS -43. 8% year-over-year, compared to -143. 6% for Werner Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNX leads at 0. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD?

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

(KNX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -8. 8% for Pamt Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNX leads at 3. 4% versus -13. 3% for PAMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNX leads at 28. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

(KNX) trades at 34. 3x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNX: 2. 6% to $65. 10.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD?

In this comparison, WERN (1.

5% yield), KNX (1. 1% yield), HTLD (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PAMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PAMT or KNX or WERN or HTLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Werner Enterprises, Inc.

(WERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WERN: +78. 1%, PAMT: -34. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PAMT and KNX and WERN and HTLD?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

KNX, WERN, HTLD pay a dividend while PAMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PAMT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KNX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WERN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HTLD

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PAMT and KNX and WERN and HTLD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PAMT: -15.1% · KNX: 1.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.