Trucking
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
Trucking
Trucking
PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Trucking | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $216M | $5.37B | $10.30B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $598M | $5.67B | $7.50B | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $98M | $34M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | -9.1% | 22.8% | 30.6% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | -12.8% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.9x | 34.6x | 39.8x |
| Total Debt | $334M | $560M | $2.89B | $752M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $202M | $303M | $60M |
PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pamt Corp. (PAMT) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Schneider National,… (SNDR) | 100 | 108.7 | +8.7% |
| Knight-Swift Transp… (KNX) | 100 | 123.0 | +23.0% |
| Werner Enterprises,… (WERN) | 100 | 98.7 | -1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SNDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 2.13x
- 7.3% revenue growth vs PAMT's -16.3%
- Lower P/E (33.9x vs 39.8x)
KNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 156.2% 10Y total return vs SNDR's 86.1%
- 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WERN's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +54.4% vs PAMT's -39.3%
WERN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 1.5%
- Beta 1.24, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 1.24 vs KNX's 1.40
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs PAMT's -16.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.9x vs 39.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs PAMT's -8.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs KNX's 1.40 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WERN's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.4% vs PAMT's -39.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs PAMT's -7.4%, ROIC 3.7% vs -11.4% |
PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KNX leads in 2 of 6 categories
SNDR leads 1 • WERN leads 1 • PAMT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 12.5x PAMT's $598M. SNDR is the more profitable business, keeping 1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAMT's -8.8%. On growth, KNX holds the edge at +1.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $598M | $5.7B | $7.5B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $608M | $1.0B | $343M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $98M | $34M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $493M | $1.3B | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +22.8% | +30.6% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | +2.8% | +2.9% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +1.7% | +0.5% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +8.7% | +17.8% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -0.2% | +1.4% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -20.0% | -104.3% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PAMT and WERN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 51.9x trailing earnings, SNDR trades at a 66% valuation discount to KNX's 154.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WERN's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAMT's 136.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $5.4B | $10.3B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $515M | $5.7B | $12.9B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.17x | 51.95x | 154.71x | -151.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.87x | 34.62x | 39.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 136.89x | 9.26x | 12.41x | 8.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 0.95x | 1.38x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.78x | 1.46x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.43x | 13.50x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SNDR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNDR delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-22 for PAMT. SNDR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAMT's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNDR scores 7/9 vs PAMT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | +3.2% | +0.5% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | +2.0% | +0.3% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.4% | +3.7% | +2.0% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.5% | +3.9% | +2.3% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.19x | 0.41x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $299M | $359M | $2.6B | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $202M | $303M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $334M | $560M | $2.9B | $752M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.48x | 3.92x | 1.36x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KNX five years ago would be worth $13,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,534 for PAMT. Over the past 12 months, KNX leads with a +54.4% total return vs PAMT's -39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNDR at 6.2% vs PAMT's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.3% | +14.0% | +21.8% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.3% | +38.5% | +54.4% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +19.9% | +14.1% | -16.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +23.2% | +34.4% | -19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | +86.1% | +156.2% | +78.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | +6.2% | +4.5% | -5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WERN is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNX's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WERN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs PAMT's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.26x | 1.36x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.29 | $33.34 | $67.75 | $38.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.15 | $20.11 | $38.63 | $23.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.7% | +91.9% | +93.6% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 62.5 | 56.4 | 65.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 963K | 3.0M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNX and WERN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAMT as "Hold", SNDR as "Hold", KNX as "Buy", WERN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.6% upside for KNX (target: $65) vs -3.2% for SNDR (target: $30). For income investors, WERN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs KNX's 1.14%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.67 | $65.10 | $36.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 25 | 36 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.38 | $0.72 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
KNX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SNDR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
PAMT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 3% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) offers the better valuation at 51. 9x trailing P/E (33. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN?
On trailing P/E, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is the cheapest at 51. 9x versus Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. at 154. 7x. On forward P/E, Schneider National, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN?
Over the past 5 years, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) delivered a total return of +34. 4%, compared to -34. 7% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNX returned +158. 6% versus PAMT's -34. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning KNX is approximately 11% more volatile than WERN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 159% for Pamt Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -16. 3% for Pamt Corp. (PAMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Schneider National, Inc. grew EPS -10. 6% year-over-year, compared to -143. 6% for Werner Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNX leads at 0. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN?
Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -8. 8% for Pamt Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNX leads at 3. 4% versus -13. 3% for PAMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNX leads at 28. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) trades at 33. 9x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNX: 2. 6% to $65. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN?
In this comparison, WERN (1.
5% yield), SNDR (1. 2% yield), KNX (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PAMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PAMT or SNDR or KNX or WERN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WERN: +78. 3%, PAMT: -34. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAMT and SNDR and KNX and WERN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SNDR, KNX, WERN pay a dividend while PAMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.