PATK vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs MHO

For growth investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, M/I Homes, Inc.

(MHO) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, M/I Homes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PulteGroup, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus NVR, Inc. 's 1. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, PulteGroup, Inc.

(PHM) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to +14. 5% for NVR, Inc. (NVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MHO returned +609. 0% versus NVR's +262. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVR, Inc.

(NVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus M/I Homes, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning MHO is approximately 59% more volatile than NVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patrick Industries, Inc. grew EPS -5. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for M/I Homes, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHM leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NVR, Inc.

(NVR) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 0% net margin versus 3. 4% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHM leads at 17. 3% versus 7. 0% for PATK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHM leads at 26. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus NVR, Inc. 's 1. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Patrick Industries, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PATK: 30. 8% to $124. 50.

In this comparison, PATK (1.

7% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), PHM (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NVR, MHO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, D.

R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 1% yield, +429. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +429. 9%, MHO: +609. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PHM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NVR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MHO is a small-cap deep-value stock. PATK, DHI, PHM pay a dividend while NVR, MHO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.