Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.16B
5Y Perf.+175.2%
LCII
LCI Industries

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.89B
5Y Perf.+20.1%
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.

Paper, Lumber & Forest Products

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.79B
5Y Perf.+84.5%
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.-10.4%
WGO
Winnebago Industries, Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$896M
5Y Perf.-41.6%

PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PATK logoPATK
LCII logoLCII
UFPI logoUFPI
THO logoTHO
WGO logoWGO
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesAuto - Recreational VehiclesPaper, Lumber & Forest ProductsAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational Vehicles
Market Cap$3.16B$2.89B$4.79B$4.08B$896M
Revenue (TTM)$3.94B$4.17B$6.19B$9.93B$2.88B
Net Income (TTM)$136M$202M$264M$300M$36M
Gross Margin22.5%24.1%16.6%14.0%13.1%
Operating Margin7.0%7.0%5.4%4.5%2.5%
Forward P/E19.5x13.3x18.0x18.6x13.6x
Total Debt$1.64B$1.24B$230M$923M$595M
Cash & Equiv.$26M$223M$925M$587M$174M

PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PATK
LCII
UFPI
THO
WGO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Patrick Industries,… (PATK)100275.2+175.2%
LCI Industries (LCII)100120.1+20.1%
UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI)100184.5+84.5%
Thor Industries, In… (THO)10089.6-10.4%
Winnebago Industrie… (WGO)10058.4-41.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LCII leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. UFP Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. WGO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PATK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 394.3% 10Y total return vs UFPI's 232.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
LCII
LCI Industries
The Income Pick

LCII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 3.9%
  • Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.5%
  • PEG 3.47 vs THO's 4.99
  • 10.2% revenue growth vs WGO's -5.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

UFPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 7.4%, current ratio 4.59x
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.7%, current ratio 4.59x
  • Beta 0.94 vs THO's 1.25, lower leverage
  • 6.5% ROA vs WGO's 1.7%, ROIC 11.4% vs 2.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, THO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
WGO
Winnebago Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

WGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 4.3% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLCII logoLCII10.2% revenue growth vs WGO's -5.9%
ValueLCII logoLCIILower P/E (13.3x vs 13.6x)
Quality / MarginsLCII logoLCII4.8% margin vs WGO's 1.3%
Stability / SafetyUFPI logoUFPIBeta 0.94 vs THO's 1.25, lower leverage
DividendsWGO logoWGO4.3% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%
Momentum (1Y)LCII logoLCII+43.9% vs UFPI's -12.9%
Efficiency (ROA)UFPI logoUFPI6.5% ROA vs WGO's 1.7%, ROIC 11.4% vs 2.6%

PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PATKPatrick Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Manufactured Housing
31.3%$681M
Marine
27.9%$606M
Industrial
23.1%$503M
Powersports
17.7%$384M
LCIILCI Industries
FY 2025
OEM Segment
43.6%$3.2B
Travel Trailer And Fifth Wheels
23.4%$1.7B
OEMs Adjacent Industries
17.0%$1.2B
Aftermarket Segment
12.8%$932M
Motorhomes
3.2%$236M
UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Retail
40.3%$2.4B
Site Built
33.2%$2.0B
Industrial
26.5%$1.6B
THOThor Industries, Inc.
FY 2020
Recreation Vehicles
100.0%$8.0B
WGOWinnebago Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Marine Segment
100.0%$368M

PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPATKLAGGINGWGO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LCII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

THO is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 3.5x WGO's $2.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (LCII) to 1.3% (WGO). On growth, WGO holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…LCII logoLCIILCI IndustriesUFPI logoUFPIUFP Industries, I…THO logoTHOThor Industries, …WGO logoWGOWinnebago Industr…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.9B$4.2B$6.2B$9.9B$2.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$445M$385M$498M$714M$132M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$136M$202M$264M$300M$36M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$194M$245M$298M$228M$136M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.5%+24.1%+16.6%+14.0%+13.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.0%+7.0%+5.4%+4.5%+2.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.5%+4.8%+4.3%+3.0%+1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.9%+5.9%+4.8%+2.3%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.6%+4.3%-8.4%+5.3%+12.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.9%+30.4%-31.5%+35.0%+2.1%
LCII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LCII and THO and WGO each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.7x trailing earnings, LCII trades at a 55% valuation discount to WGO's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UFPI offers better value at 3.70x vs THO's 4.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…LCII logoLCIILCI IndustriesUFPI logoUFPIUFP Industries, I…THO logoTHOThor Industries, …WGO logoWGOWinnebago Industr…
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$2.9B$4.8B$4.1B$896M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.8B$3.9B$4.1B$4.4B$1.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.40x15.70x16.88x15.95x34.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.47x13.32x18.05x18.61x13.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.09x3.70x4.28x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.71x9.72x7.76x6.41x13.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.80x0.70x0.76x0.43x0.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.78x2.17x1.61x0.96x0.73x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.83x10.37x17.34x8.97x10.01x
Evenly matched — LCII and THO and WGO each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LCII delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $3 for WGO. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LCII scores 8/9 vs UFPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…LCII logoLCIILCI IndustriesUFPI logoUFPIUFP Industries, I…THO logoTHOThor Industries, …WGO logoWGOWinnebago Industr…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.6%+14.7%+8.4%+7.0%+3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.4%+6.3%+6.5%+4.3%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.6%+9.1%+11.4%+6.7%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.2%+10.8%+10.2%+7.6%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.39x0.91x0.07x0.22x0.49x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.6B$1.0B-$695M$336M$421M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26M$223M$925M$587M$174M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.6B$1.2B$230M$923M$595M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.40x5.49x43.92x9.82x2.77x
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PATK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PATK five years ago would be worth $16,196 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,579 for WGO. Over the past 12 months, LCII leads with a +43.9% total return vs UFPI's -12.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.6% vs WGO's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…LCII logoLCIILCI IndustriesUFPI logoUFPIUFP Industries, I…THO logoTHOThor Industries, …WGO logoWGOWinnebago Industr…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.4%-3.5%-8.1%-25.8%-20.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+16.2%+43.9%-12.9%+3.9%-1.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+127.7%+13.3%+6.9%+0.6%-39.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.0%+7.6%+2.4%-38.7%-54.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+394.3%+114.9%+232.5%+44.1%+88.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.6%+4.2%+2.3%+0.2%-15.6%
PATK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LCII and UFPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

UFPI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THO's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LCII currently trades 74.4% from its 52-week high vs THO's 62.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…LCII logoLCIILCI IndustriesUFPI logoUFPIUFP Industries, I…THO logoTHOThor Industries, …WGO logoWGOWinnebago Industr…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.00x1.09x0.94x1.25x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$148.50$159.66$118.00$122.83$50.16
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$81.21$83.87$80.06$73.36$28.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.1%+74.4%+71.5%+62.9%+63.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.245.035.043.545.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded471K352K382K740K617K
Evenly matched — LCII and UFPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — UFPI and WGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PATK as "Buy", LCII as "Hold", UFPI as "Buy", THO as "Hold", WGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.0% upside for THO (target: $114) vs 22.1% for UFPI (target: $103). For income investors, WGO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs UFPI's 1.66%.

MetricPATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…LCII logoLCIILCI IndustriesUFPI logoUFPIUFP Industries, I…THO logoTHOThor Industries, …WGO logoWGOWinnebago Industr…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$124.50$148.60$103.00$114.25$41.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts171484122
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+3.9%+1.7%+2.6%+4.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1913107
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.60$4.59$1.40$1.99$1.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%+4.5%+9.0%+1.3%+6.0%
Evenly matched — UFPI and WGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LCII leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). UFPI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallPatrick Industries, Inc. (PATK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PATK vs LCII vs UFPI vs THO vs WGO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LCI Industries (LCII) is the stronger pick with 10.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). LCI Industries (LCII) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO?

On trailing P/E, LCI Industries (LCII) is the cheapest at 15.

7x versus Winnebago Industries, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, LCI Industries is actually cheaper at 13. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LCI Industries wins at 3. 47x versus Thor Industries, Inc. 's 4. 99x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO?

Over the past 5 years, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) delivered a total return of +62. 0%, compared to -54. 2% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PATK returned +394. 3% versus THO's +44. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UFP Industries, Inc.

(UFPI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Thor Industries, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning THO is approximately 33% more volatile than UFPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LCI Industries (LCII) is pulling ahead at 10.

2% versus -5. 9% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Winnebago Industries, Inc. grew EPS 106. 8% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for UFP Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PATK leads at -6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO?

UFP Industries, Inc.

(UFPI) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 7% net margin versus 0. 9% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PATK leads at 7. 0% versus 2. 0% for WGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCII leads at 23. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, LCI Industries (LCII) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 47x versus Thor Industries, Inc. 's 4. 99x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, LCI Industries (LCII) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Patrick Industries, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for THO: 48. 0% to $114. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 7% for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI).

09

Is PATK or LCII or UFPI or THO or WGO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +394. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PATK: +394. 3%, THO: +44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PATK and LCII and UFPI and THO and WGO?

These companies operate in different sectors (PATK (Consumer Cyclical) and LCII (Consumer Cyclical) and UFPI (Basic Materials) and THO (Consumer Cyclical) and WGO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LCII is a small-cap deep-value stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; THO is a small-cap deep-value stock; WGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PATK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LCII

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UFPI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

THO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WGO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PATK and LCII and UFPI and THO and WGO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PATK: -0.6% · LCII: 4.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(PATK: 3.5% · LCII: 4.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PATK: 24.4x · LCII: 15.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.