Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $7.05B | $10.28B | $7.85B | $7.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.74B | $3.36B | $2.90B | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $543M | $537M | $530M | $566M |
| Gross Margin | 71.9% | 57.1% | 59.3% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 19.8% | 23.3% | 34.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 13.0x | 12.1x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.15B | $4.45B | $34M | $3.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.75B | $1.43B | $1.73B | $803M |
PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prosperity Bancshar… (PB) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| Cadence Bank (CADE) | 100 | 189.4 | +89.4% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 28.2%, current ratio 0.43x
- Beta 0.80, yield 3.4%, current ratio 0.43x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs CADE's 122.6%
- +44.8% vs CBSH's -13.9%
CADE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -5.1%
- 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs PB's -0.2%
- Lower P/E (12.1x vs 13.0x), PEG 3.20 vs 4.38
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.15 vs BOKF's 4.38
- NIM 3.4% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- Beta 0.70 vs CADE's 1.41
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs PB's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 13.0x), PEG 3.20 vs 4.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs CADE's 1.41 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs CADE's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs CBSH's -13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% |
PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CADE leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • CBSH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 1.9x PB's $1.7B. PB is the more profitable business, keeping 31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $3.4B | $2.9B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $849M | $797M | $722M | $796M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $543M | $537M | $530M | $566M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $529M | $1.5B | $508M | $570M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.9% | +57.1% | +59.3% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +19.8% | +23.3% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +15.6% | +18.0% | +26.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +42.6% | +26.7% | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +1.8% | -6.9% | +1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CADE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, PB trades at a 26% valuation discount to BOKF's 16.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs PB's 88.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $10.3B | $7.8B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $13.3B | $6.1B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.14x | 16.39x | 15.20x | 12.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.42x | 13.05x | 12.12x | 13.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 88.43x | 5.51x | 4.01x | 1.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.77x | 17.23x | 7.00x | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 3.06x | 2.70x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 1.53x | 1.40x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.63x | 7.19x | 10.10x | 13.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CADE and CBSH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for PB. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PB scores 8/9 vs CBSH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +8.9% | +8.7% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +4.1% | +6.7% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +5.5% | +10.4% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.80x | 0.01x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $404M | $3.0B | -$1.7B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $803M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $4.5B | $34M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.42x | 0.55x | 0.66x | 1.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,711 for CBSH. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs CBSH's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 35.0% vs CBSH's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +13.0% | -1.8% | +1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | +44.8% | +44.1% | -13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +79.4% | +146.0% | +20.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.1% | +59.4% | +52.3% | -12.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.9% | +168.5% | +122.6% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | +21.5% | +35.0% | +6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOKF and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.03x | 1.41x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.20 | $139.73 | $46.74 | $66.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.07 | $91.35 | $29.62 | $46.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +95.5% | +90.1% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 58.9 | 46.7 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 317K | 80.6M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
PB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PB as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", CADE as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for CBSH (target: $59) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, PB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.37% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.00 | $131.57 | $39.75 | $58.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 21 | 20 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +1.7% | +2.3% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 26 | 11 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.34 | $2.24 | $0.98 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.9% | +0.5% | +2.7% |
PB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CADE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PB vs BOKF vs CADE vs CBSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB). Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH?
On trailing P/E, Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
(PB) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, Cadence Bank is actually cheaper at 12. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Commerce Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 's 88. 43x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -12. 9% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus PB's +79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 100% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.
4% versus -0. 2% for Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Cadence Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH?
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
(PB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PB leads at 39. 9% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 's 88. 43x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Cadence Bank (CADE) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBSH: 11. 5% to $58. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is PB or BOKF or CADE or CBSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 1% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +103. 4%, CADE: +122. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PB and BOKF and CADE and CBSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.